Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to investigate the efficacy and safety of the acute use of sodium picosulphate in patients with chronic constipation.

There are few studies supporting the effective and safe use of laxatives for constipation. This study examined the short-term efficacy and safety of sodium picosulphate in patients with chronic constipation. Patients with a history of chronic constipation for at least 3 months were randomised to receive 7 mg sodium picosulphate or placebo for three consecutive nights. Patients recorded stool frequency and consistency, straining, bloating, and pain at baseline and during treatment. Vital signs, haematocrit, serum creatinine and electrolytes were monitored. Primary end-point for efficacy was the occurrence of a response to treatment, defined as improvement in stool frequency and occurrence of straining. All 57 randomised patients (sodium picosulphate n = 29, placebo n = 28; mean age 54.8 and 54.1 years) completed the study. Sodium picosulphate produced a treatment response (improved stool frequency and straining) in 82.8% compared with 50% in the placebo group (p = 0.010) and reduced bloating more often than placebo. There were no serious adverse events and one patient with diarrhoea and another with abdominal pain in each treatment group. There were no cardiovascular effects, changes in serum haematocrit, creatinine or electrolytes in either group. This study confirmed that sodium picosulphate is an effective, well-tolerated and safe laxative in the acute treatment of constipation.

Efficacy and safety of bisacodyl in the acute treatment of constipation: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Although laxatives are a first-line treatment for constipation, there are few randomized placebo-controlled trials assessing their efficacy. AIM: To determine the effect and safety of oral bisacodyl on stool frequency and consistency in patients with idiopathic constipation. METHODS: 55 patients (age 19-89 years) with idiopathic constipation were recruited from eight primary care practices and randomized to receive bisacodyl, 10 mg once daily, or placebo, on three successive days following a 3-day run-in period. Patients recorded stool frequency and consistency and adverse events. RESULTS; In each treatment group, 27 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The mean number of stools per day was significantly greater in the bisacodyl-treated group (1.8/day) compared with placebo (0.95/day) over the treatment phase (P=0.0061). Mean stool consistency score improved from 'hard' (run-in) to between 'soft' and 'well-formed' during bisacodyl treatment, remaining between 'moderately hard' and 'hard' for placebo treatment (P<0.0001). The investigator's global efficacy score was superior for the bisacodyl group compared with placebo. Both treatments were well tolerated. Serum electrolyte levels and incidence of adverse events were comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bisacodyl is effective and safe in improving stool frequency and consistency in acute treatment of idiopathic constipation.

Efficacy and safety of metamizol vs. acetylsalicylic acid in patients with moderate episodic tension-type headache: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, multicentre study.

We assessed the efficacy and safety of oral single doses of 0.5 and 1 g metamizol vs. 1 g acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in 417 patients with moderate episodic tension-type headache included in a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel, multicentre trial. Eligibility criteria included 18-65 years of age, history of at least two episodes of tension-type headache per month in the 3 months prior to enrollment, and successful previous pain relief with a non-opioid analgesic. Treatment arms were metamizol 0.5 g (n = 102), metamizol 1 g (n = 108), ASA 1 g (n = 102) and placebo (n = 105). The analgesic efficacy of 0.5 and 1 g metamizol vs. placebo was highly statistically significant (alpha: 0.025; one-sided) for sum of pain intensity differences, maximum pain intensity difference, number of patients with at least 50% pain reduction, time to 50% pain reduction, maximum pain relief and total pain relief. A trend towards an earlier onset of a more profound pain relief of 0.5 and 1 g metamizol over 1 g ASA was noticed. All medications including placebo were almost equally safe and well tolerated.

Efficacy of orally administered extract of red vine leaf AS 195 (folia vitis viniferae) in chronic venous insufficiency (stages I-II). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

UNLABELLED: Red vine leaf extract (RVLE) is a herbal medicine containing several flavonoids, with quercetin-3-O-beta-glucuronide and isoquercitrin (quercetin-3-O-beta-glycoside) as the main components. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily doses of 360 and 720 mg RVLE (pharmaceutical extract code AS 195; Antistax Venenkapseln) compared to placebo in patients with stage I and incipient stage II chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). DESIGN: A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study. PATIENTS: Male and female outpatients aged 25 to 75 years with stage I to stage II CVI (i.e. without extensive trophic changes), not having any other significant medical conditions and not treated with compression stockings, diuretics or other drugs affecting fluid balance. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to a double-blind treatment with placebo, 360 mg AS 195 or 720 mg AS 195 once daily for 12 weeks, preceded and followed by a single-blind 2-week placebo treatment for baseline run-in and end-of-trial washout, respectively. Study criteria were evaluated at baseline, after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment and 2 weeks after discontinuation of treatment. RESULTS: Of the 260 patients enrolled and randomized, 219 completed the study in accordance with the protocol. In the intention-to-treat analysis (N = 257), the mean (+/- SD) lower leg volume (measured by water displacement plethysmography) of the patients treated with placebo (N = 87) increased by 15.2 +/- 90.1 g (displaced water mass) and by 33.7 +/- 96.1 g after 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline. In contrast, for patients treated with AS 195, lower leg volume decreased, and after 12 weeks of treatment, the difference in mean lower leg volume between the active treatment groups and the placebo group was -75.9 g (95% CI: -106.1 to -45.8 g) and -99.9 g (95% CI: -130.3 to -69.6 g) for the group treated with 360-mg AS 195 (N = 86) and 720-mg AS 195 (N = 84), respectively. The changes in calf circumference showed a similar pattern: in patients treated with AS 195, both the higher dose (720 mg) and, albeit to a lesser extent, the lower dose (360 mg) resulted in a clear reduction in circumference over time, whereas, circumference remained largely unchanged in patients treated with the placebo (95% CI of the estimated treatment effects vs. placebo after 12 weeks: -1.40 to -0.56 cm and -1.73 to -0.88 cm for 360 and 720 mg AS 195, respectively). These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The reductions in ankle circumference were qualitatively similar but quantitatively less marked. Subjectively, there was an improvement in key CVI symptoms (VAS) at 6 weeks with all treatments, but a further improvement at week 12 was seen only in the active treatment groups; at 12 weeks, the changes compared to baseline were significantly greater (p < 0.001) in both active treatment groups than in the placebo group. The treatments were well tolerated; Adverse events were rare and usually mild. Two adverse events (AEs) during treatment with the placebo led to hospitalization and were hence labeled as 'serious'. Three further patients were withdrawn because of AEs which occurred during treatment with the placebo. CONCLUSION: Once-daily doses of 360 and 720 mg AS 195 were confirmed to be safe and effective in the treatment of mild CVI, reducing significantly lower leg edema and circumference whilst improving key CVI-related symptoms to a clinically relevant extent. The edema reduction is at least equivalent to that reported for compression stockings and/or other edema-reducing agents. The higher dose was as well tolerated as the lower dose but resulted in a slightly greater and more sustained improvement.

Controlled exposure to mite allergen for a dose-finding of dimethindene maleate (DMM).

The aim of the study was to develop a laboratory system to challenge mite allergic patients with physiological concentrations of Der p I in order to evaluate the efficacy of antiallergic drugs in mite allergic patients. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study was designed with three consecutive sessions. Twelve patients with proven sensitivity to dust mite were treated with a single dose of dimethindene maleate in a FOAD formulation (4 and 8 mg vs. placebo) 12 h before a long-term challenge with mite allergen Der p I in the Vienna challenge chamber. Challenge was performed with a constant concentration of 40 ng Der p I per cubic meter of air for 4 h. Nasal parameters were recorded at 15 min intervals during long-term challenge. In comparison to placebo, dimethindene leads to a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.05) of the nasal response at both concentrations tested. The house-dust mite model in the Vienna challenge chamber thus proved to be a useful tool for drug investigations in mite allergies.

Dose-related control of allergic rhinitis symptoms by a H1-receptor antagonist. Finding the proper doses [correction of dosis] of dimethindene maleate in patients with allergic rhinitis.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and duration of two doses of dimethindene, in a sustained release pellet formulation, with a standardized grass pollen provocation model (Vienna Challenge Chamber, VCC). The study of 12 grass pollen-allergic volunteers (verified by case history, skin prick test and RAST) was carried out in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over design. 12 h before a 4-hour continuous challenge with permanent 1,000 Dactylis grass pollen/m3 of air in the VCC, 4 or 8 mg of dimethindene (Fenistil pellets) or an identically appearing placebo was administered in three sessions. Nasal flow and resistance, nasal secretion and subjective symptoms were recorded at 15-min intervals during this long-term challenge under reproducible conditions. In comparison to placebo, dimethindene leads to a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.05) in nasal response and clinical symptoms for at least 16 h after treatment. The efficacy of 8 mg dimethindene was superior to that of 4 mg dimethindene; however, the differences between both active treatments were not statistically significant. Therefore 4 mg dimethindene once a day is adequate for usual pollinotic disease conditions.

Pharmacodynamic dose finding of dimetindene in a sustained release formulation.

A sustained release form of dimetindene (dimethindene maleate, Fenistil, CAS 3614-69-5) was developed based on a micropellet technique. Aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and duration of two doses of dimetindene in a sustained release pellet formulation with a standardised grass pollen provacation model (Vienna Challenge Chamber; VCC). The study with 12 grass pollen allergic volunteers--verified by case history, skin prick test (SPT), and radio allergo sorbent test (RAST)--was carried out in a placebo controlled, double blind, cross-over design. 12 h before a 4-h-lasting continuous challenge with permanent 1000 dactylis grass pollen in the VCC, administration of dimetindene (Fenistil R Pellets) in doses of 4 mg, 8 mg or identically appearing placebo was scheduled in three sessions. Nasal flow and resistance, nasal secretion and subjective symptoms were recorded at 15-min intervals during this long-term challenge under reproducible conditions. In comparison to placebo, dimetindene leads to a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.05) of nasal response and clinical symptoms for at least 16 h after treatment. The efficacy of 8 mg dimetindene was pronounced over 4 mg, however, the differences between both active treatments were not statistically significant. Therefore 4 mg dimetindene once a day is the adequate treatment for usual pollinotic disease conditions.