Bioluminescence Imaging In Vivo Confirms the Viability of Pancreatic Islets Transplanted into the Greater Omentum.

PURPOSE: The liver is the most widely used site for pancreatic islet transplantation. However, several site-specific limitations impair functional success, with instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction being the most important. The aim of this study was to develop a preclinical model for placement of the islet graft into a highly vascularized omental flap using a fibrin gel. For this purpose, we tested islet viability by bioluminescence imaging (BLI). PROCEDURES: Pancreatic islets were isolated from luciferase-positive and luciferase-negative rats, mixed at a 1:1 ratio, placed into a plasma-thrombin bioscaffold, and transplanted in standard (10 pancreatic islets/g wt; n = 10) and marginal (4 pancreatic islets/g wt; n = 7) numbers into the omentums of syngeneic diabetic animals. For the control, 4 pancreatic islets/g were transplanted into the liver using the standard procedure (n = 7). Graft viability was tested by bioluminescence at days 14, 30, 60, and 90 post transplant. Glucose levels, intravenous glucose tolerance, and serum C-peptide were assessed regularly. RESULTS: Nonfasting glucose levels < 10 mmol/l were restored in all animals. While islet viability in the omentum was clearly detected by stable luminescence signals throughout the whole study period, no signals were detected from islets transplanted into the liver. The bioluminescence signals were highly correlated with stimulated C-peptide levels detected at 80 days post transplant. Glucose tolerance did not differ among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully tested a preclinical model of islet transplantation into the greater omentum using a biocompatible scaffold made from autologous plasma and human thrombin. Both standard and marginal pancreatic islet numbers in a gel-form bioscaffold placed in the omentum restored glucose homeostasis in recipients with diabetes. Bioluminescence was shown promising as a direct proof of islet viability.

Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation-Myth or reality?

Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy due to sudden glucose normalization is a feared complication of pancreas transplantation; however, its rate or severity has not been studied prospectively. We followed up 43 pancreas and kidney recipients for a composite endpoint comprising new need for laser therapy, newly diagnosed proliferation, macular edema, visual acuity worsening, and blindness over 12 months. Although 37% of patients met this primary endpoint, its severity was rather low. Mean central retinal thickness and proportion of patients with subclinical macular edema increased significantly, with spontaneous resolution in half of them. Visual acuity did not change. There was no significant difference in the absolute glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) drop, age, and diabetes duration between the patients who met and those who did not meet the primary endpoint, but a higher proportion of patients with worsening had a recent history of laser treatment. Retinopathy remained stable in 62.8% of patients. In 26%, the visual acuity significantly improved. Although retinopathy worsening was documented in more than one-third of patients, its evolution was not related to the magnitude of metabolic change; rather, it corresponded to the expected natural course of retinopathy. Nonetheless, comprehensive ophthalmologic care should be a substantial component of the recipient management.

Benefits of Islet Transplantation as an Alternative to Pancreas Transplantation: Retrospective Study of More Than 10 Ten Years of Experience in a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas transplantation (PTx) represents the method of choice in type 1 diabetic patients with conservatively intractable hypoglycemia unawareness syndrome. In 2005, the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM) launched a program to investigate the safety potential of islet transplantation (ITx) in comparison to PTx. AIM: This study aims to compare the results of PTx and ITx regarding severe hypoglycemia elimination, metabolic control, and complication rate. METHODS: We analyzed the results of 30 patients undergoing ITx and 49 patients treated with PTx. All patients were C-peptide-negative and suffered from hypoglycemia unawareness syndrome. Patients in the ITx group received a mean number of 12,349 (6,387-15,331) IEQ/kg/person administered percutaneously into the portal vein under local anesthesia and radiological control. The islet number was reached by 1-3 applications, as needed. In both groups, we evaluated glycated hemoglobin, insulin dose, fasting and stimulated C-peptide, frequency of severe hypoglycemia, and complications. We used the Mann Whitney test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and paired t-test for analysis. We also individually assessed the ITx outcomes for each patient according to recently suggested criteria established at the EPITA meeting in Igls. RESULTS: Most of the recipients showed a significant improvement in metabolic control one and two years after ITx, with a significant decrease in HbA1c, significant elevation of fasting and stimulated C-peptide, and a markedly significant reduction in insulin dose and the frequency of severe hypoglycemia. Seventeen percent of ITx recipients were temporarily insulin-independent. The results in the PTx group were comparable to those in the ITx group, with 73% graft survival and insulin independence in year 1, 68% 2 years and 55% 5 years after transplantation. There was a higher rate of complications related to the procedure in the PTx group. Severe hypoglycemia was eliminated in the majority of both ITx and PTx recipients. CONCLUSION: This report proves the successful initiation of pancreatic islet transplantation in a center with a well-established PTx program. ITx has been shown to be the method of choice for hypoglycemia unawareness syndrome, and may be considered for application in clinical practice if conservative options are exhausted.