RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the way theta burst stimulation (TBS) applied to the motor cortex (M1) affects TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). There have been few direct comparisons of continuous TBS (cTBS) and intermittent TBS (iTBS), and there is a lack of consensus from existing literature on the induced effects. We performed an exploratory trial to assess the effect of M1-cTBS and M1-iTBS on TEP components. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-over design, 15 participants each completed three experimental sessions with ≥one week in between sessions. The effect of a single TBS train administered over M1 was investigated using TEPs recorded at the same location, 20 to 30 minutes before and in the first 10 minutes after the intervention. In each session, a different type of TBS (cTBS, iTBS, or active control cTBS) was administered in a single-blinded randomized order. For six different TEP components (N15, P30, N45, P60, N100, and P180), amplitude was compared before and after the intervention using cluster-based permutation (CBP) analysis. RESULTS: We were unable to identify a significant modulation of any of the six predefined M1 TEP components after a single train of TBS. When waiving statistical correction for multiple testing in view of the exploratory nature of the study, the CBP analysis supports a reduction of the P180 amplitude after iTBS (p = 0.015), whereas no effect was observed after cTBS or in the active control condition. The reduction occurred in ten of 15 subjects, showing intersubject variability. CONCLUSIONS: The observed decrease in the P180 amplitude after iTBS may suggest a neuromodulatory effect of iTBS. Despite methodologic issues related to our study and the potential sensory contamination within this latency range of the TEP, we believe that our finding deserves further investigation in hypothesis-driven trials of adequate power and proper design, focusing on disentanglement between TEPs and peripherally evoked potentials, in addition to indicating reproducibility across sessions and subjects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT05206162.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used to modulate neuronal activity, but the exact mechanism of action (MOA) is unclear. This study investigates tDCS-induced modulation of the corticospinal excitability and the underlying MOA. By anesthetizing the scalp before applying tDCS and by stimulating the cheeks, we investigated whether stimulation of peripheral and/or cranial nerves contributes to the effects of tDCS on corticospinal excitability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized cross-over study, four experimental conditions with anodal direct current stimulation were compared in 19 healthy volunteers: 1) tDCS over the motor cortex (tDCS-MI), 2) tDCS over the motor cortex with a locally applied topical anesthetic (TA) on the scalp (tDCS-MI + TA), 3) DCS over the cheek region (DCS-C), and 4) sham tDCS over the motor cortex(sham). tDCS was applied for 20 minutes at 1 mA. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured before tDCS and immediately, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after tDCS. A questionnaire was used to assess the tolerability of tDCS. RESULTS: A significant MEP amplitude increase compared with baseline was found 30 minutes after tDCS-MI, an effect still observed 60 minutes later; no time∗condition interaction effect was detected. In the other three conditions (tDCS-MI + TA, DCS-C, sham), no significant MEP modulation was found. The questionnaire indicated that side effects are significantly lower when the local anesthetic was applied before stimulation than in the other three conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The significant MEP amplitude increase observed from 30 minutes on after tDCS-MI supports the modulatory effect of tDCS on corticospinal neurotransmission. This effect lasted one hour after stimulation. The absence of a significant modulation when a local anesthetic was applied suggests that effects of tDCS are not solely established through direct cortical stimulation but that stimulation of peripheral and/or cranial nerves also might contribute to tDCS-induced modulation.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current treatments for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) poorly address chronic innate neuroinflammation nor do they offer effective remyelination. The vagus nerve has a strong regulatory role in inflammation and Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) has potential to affect both neuroinflammation and remyelination in MS. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effects of VNS on demyelination and innate neuroinflammation in a validated MS rodent model. METHODS: Lysolecithin (LPC) was injected in the corpus callosum (CC) of 46 Lewis rats, inducing a demyelinated lesion. 33/46 rats received continuously-cycled VNS (cVNS) or one-minute per day VNS (1minVNS) or sham VNS from 2 days before LPC-injection until perfusion at 3 days post-injection (dpi) (corresponding with a demyelinated lesion with peak inflammation). 13/46 rats received cVNS or sham from 2 days before LPC-injection until perfusion at 11 dpi (corresponding with a partial remyelinated lesion). Immunohistochemistry and proteomics analyses were performed to investigate the extend of demyelination and inflammation. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry showed that cVNS significantly reduced microglial and astrocytic activation in the lesion and lesion border, and significantly reduced the Olig2+ cell count at 3 dpi. Furthermore, cVNS significantly improved remyelination with 57.4 % versus sham at 11 dpi. Proteomic gene set enrichment analyses showed increased activation of (glutamatergic) synapse pathways in cVNS versus sham, most pronounced at 3 dpi. CONCLUSION: cVNS improved remyelination of an LPC-induced lesion. Possible mechanisms might include modulation of microglia and astrocyte activity, increased (glutamatergic) synapses and enhanced oligodendrocyte clearance after initial injury.
Assuntos
Doenças Desmielinizantes , Lisofosfatidilcolinas , Ratos Endogâmicos Lew , Remielinização , Estimulação do Nervo Vago , Animais , Ratos , Remielinização/fisiologia , Remielinização/efeitos dos fármacos , Lisofosfatidilcolinas/toxicidade , Doenças Desmielinizantes/terapia , Doenças Desmielinizantes/induzido quimicamente , Estimulação do Nervo Vago/métodos , Masculino , Doenças Neuroinflamatórias/terapia , Doenças Neuroinflamatórias/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Neuroinflamatórias/etiologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Esclerose Múltipla/terapia , Esclerose Múltipla/induzido quimicamente , Corpo CalosoRESUMO
The intrahippocampal kainic acid (IHKA) mouse model is an extensively used in vivo model to investigate the pathophysiology of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) and to develop novel therapies for drug-resistant epilepsy. It is characterized by profound hippocampal sclerosis and spontaneously occurring seizures with a major role for the injected damaged hippocampus, but little is known about the excitability of specific subregions. The purpose of this study was to electrophysiologically characterize the excitability of hippocampal subregions in the chronic phase of the induced epilepsy in the IHKA mouse model. We recorded field postsynaptic potentials (fPSPs) after electrical stimulation in the CA1 region and in the dentate gyrus (DG) of hippocampal slices of IHKA and healthy mice using a multielectrode array (MEA). In the DG, a significantly steeper fPSP slope was found, reflecting higher synaptic strength. Population spikes were more prevalent with a larger spatial distribution in the IHKA group, reflecting a higher degree of granule cell output. Only minor differences were found in the CA1 region. These results point to increased neuronal excitability in the DG but not in the CA1 region of the hippocampus of IHKA mice. This method, in which the excitability of hippocampal slices from IHKA mice is investigated using a MEA, can now be further explored as a potential new model to screen for new interventions that can restore DG function and potentially lead to novel therapies for mTLE.
Assuntos
Epilepsia do Lobo Temporal , Animais , Camundongos , Epilepsia do Lobo Temporal/induzido quimicamente , Ácido Caínico , Convulsões , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Giro DenteadoRESUMO
Chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation (CSCS) is a form of neurostimulation consisting of continuous or cyclic, open-loop, subthreshold electrical stimulation of a well-defined epileptogenic zone (EZ). CSCS has seen limited clinical use but could be a safe and effective long-term treatment of focal drug resistant epilepsy, in particular when the EZ is located in the motor cortex. We present a case of a 49-year-old woman suffering from debilitating focal motor seizures. Treatment with CSCS resulted in significant clinical improvement, enabling her to walk unaided for the first time in years.
RESUMO
The experience with neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy is far less extensive than for adults. Nevertheless, the implementation of these techniques could be of great value, especially considering the detrimental effects of ongoing seizures on the developing brain. In this review, we discuss the available evidence for neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is the most studied neurostimulation modality in children. Based on mostly retrospective, open-label studies, we can conclude that VNS has a similar safety and efficacy profile in children compared to adults. Although there is little available evidence for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in children, both DBS and RNS show promise in reducing seizure frequency with few complications. The implementation of non-invasive techniques with a more appealing safety profile has gained interest. Small randomized control trials and open-label studies have investigated transcranial direct current simulation for childhood epilepsy, demonstrating promising but inconsistent findings.
Assuntos
Epilepsia , Estimulação do Nervo Vago , Criança , Humanos , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/efeitos adversos , Epilepsia/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Convulsões , Estimulação do Nervo Vago/efeitos adversos , Estimulação do Nervo Vago/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
The locus coeruleus (LC) is a small brainstem nucleus and is the sole source of noradrenaline in the neocortex, hippocampus and cerebellum. Noradrenaline is a powerful neuromodulator involved in the regulation of excitability and plasticity of large-scale brain networks. In this study, we performed a detailed assessment of the activity of locus coeruleus neurons and changes in noradrenergic transmission during acute hippocampal seizures evoked with perforant path stimulation, using state-of-the-art methodology. Action potentials of LC neurons, of which some were identified by means of optogenetics, were recorded in anesthetized rats using a multichannel high-density electrophysiology probe. The seizure-induced change in firing rate differed between LC neurons: 55% of neurons decreased in firing rate during seizures, while 28% increased their firing rate. Topographic analysis of multi-unit activity over the electrophysiology probe showed a topographic clustering of neurons that were inhibited or excited during seizures. Changes in hippocampal noradrenaline transmission during seizures were assessed using a fluorescent biosensor for noradrenaline, GRABNE2m, in combination with fiber photometry, in both anesthetized and awake rats. Although our neuronal recordings indicated both inhibition and excitation of LC neurons during seizures, a consistent release of noradrenaline was observed. Concentrations of noradrenaline increased at seizure onset and decreased during or shortly after the seizure. In conclusion, this study showed consistent but heterogeneous modulation of LC neurons and a consistent time-locked release of hippocampal noradrenaline during acute hippocampal seizures.
Assuntos
Locus Cerúleo , Norepinefrina , Ratos , Animais , Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Convulsões , Hipocampo , NeurôniosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in clinical practice is gaining increasing attention. This study aimed to provide a critical assessment of the current state-of-the-art and beliefs about the use of PRO in the management of people with epilepsy across some European countries. METHODS: Structured interviews were conducted with European experts to collect insights about (I) the personal experience with PRO; (II) the value and impact of PRO in the decision-making process at the national level; and (III) the interest for and use of PRO by national health authorities. RESULTS: Nine neurologists (Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, France, Greece, Italy, Poland, and United Kingdom), three health economists (Portugal, Romania, and Sweden), and one epidemiologist (Slovakia) participated. They all stated that PRO are collected at their own countries in the context of clinical trials and/or specific projects. During everyday clinical practice, PRO are collected routinely/almost routinely in Austria and Sweden and only at the discretion of the treating physicians in Czechia, Denmark, France, Greece, and Portugal. There was complete consensus about the favorable impact that the PRO can have in terms of clinical outcomes, healthcare resources utilization, and general patient satisfaction. Only participants from Portugal and Sweden answered that the PRO are perceived as very important by the National Health Authorities of their respective countries. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist in attitudes and perspectives about PRO in epilepsy across Europe. An active plan is warranted to harmonize the measurement of PRO and ensure they can be relevant to people with epilepsy and health services.
Assuntos
Epilepsia , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Humanos , Europa (Continente) , Itália , Polônia , Epilepsia/terapiaRESUMO
Management of drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) represents a challenge to the treating clinician. This manuscript addresses DRE and provides an overview of treatment options, medical, surgical, and dietary. It addresses treatment strategies in polytherapy, then focuses on the role cenobamate (CNB) may play in reducing the burden of DRE while providing practical advice for its introduction. CNB is a recently approved, third generation, anti-seizure medication (ASM), a tetrazole-derived carbamate, thought to have a dual mechanism of action, through its effect on sodium channels as well as on GABAA receptors at a non-benzodiazepine site. CNB, having a long half-life, is an effective add-on ASM in refractory focal epilepsy with a higher response rate and a higher seizure-freedom rate than is usually seen in regulatory clinical trials. Experience post-licensing, though still limited, supports the findings of clinical trials and is encouraging. Its spectrum of action in relation to generalized epilepsies and seizures remains to be established, and there are no data on its efficacy in monotherapy. At the time of writing, CNB has been prescribed for some 50 000 individuals with DRE and focal epilepsy. A larger number is needed to fully establish its safety profile. It should at all times be introduced slowly to minimize the risk of serious allergic drug reactions. It has clinically meaningful interactions which must be anticipated and managed to maximize tolerability and likelihood of successful treatment. Despite the above, it may well prove to be of major benefit in the treatment of many patients with drug resistant epilepsy.
Assuntos
Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos , Epilepsias Parciais , Humanos , Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsias Parciais/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsias Parciais/induzido quimicamente , Carbamatos/farmacologia , Carbamatos/uso terapêutico , Tetrazóis/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was the first device-based therapy for epilepsy, having launched in 1994 in Europe and 1997 in the United States. Since then, significant advances in the understanding of the mechanism of action of VNS and the central neurocircuitry that VNS modulates have impacted how the therapy is practically implemented. However, there has been little change to VNS stimulation parameters since the late 1990s. Short bursts of high frequency stimulation have been of increasing interest to other neuromodulation targets e.g., the spine, and these high frequency bursts elicit unique effects in the central nervous system, especially when applied to the vagus nerve. In the current study, we describe a protocol design that is aimed to assess the impact of high frequency bursts of stimulation, called "Microburst VNS", in subjects with refractory focal and generalized epilepsies treated with this novel stimulation pattern in addition to standard anti-seizure medications. This protocol also employed an investigational, fMRI-guided titration protocol that permits personalized dosing of Microburst VNS among the treated population depending on the thalamic blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal. The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03446664). The first subject was enrolled in 2018 and the final results are expected in 2023.
RESUMO
Importance: For the large population of people with drug-refractory epilepsy, alternative treatment approaches are needed. Clinical trial outcomes of a novel stimulation device, which is newly available in Europe for the treatment of patients with a predominant seizure focus, are reported for the first time. Objective: To perform a pooled analysis of the results of 2 prospective, multicenter, single-arm trials, A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Neurostimulation With the EASEE System to Treat Medically Refractory Focal Epilepsy (EASEE II) and A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Patient-Controlled Neurostimulation With the EASEE System to Treat Medically Refractory Focal Epilepsy (PIMIDES I), assessing the safety and efficacy of epicranial focal cortex stimulation (FCS) with a novel implantable device (EASEE [Precisis]) as adjunctive treatment for adult patients with drug-refractory focal epilepsy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a pooled analysis of 2 nonrandomized uncontrolled trials, EASEE II and PIMIDES I, which began on January 15, 2019, and January 14, 2020, respectively, and ended on July 28, 2021. EASEE II and PIMIDES I were the first in-human, prospective, single-arm trials with an 8-month evaluation period. Patients were recruited at 7 European epilepsy centers. Consecutive participants with drug-refractory focal epilepsy were enrolled. Study data were analyzed from September 29, 2021, to February 2, 2022. Interventions: After a 1-month prospective baseline period, patients were implanted with the neurostimulation device. After a 1-month postimplantation recovery period, unblinded FCS was activated using both high-frequency and direct current (DC)-like components performed via electrode arrays placed epicranially above the individual epileptic focus region. Main Outcomes and Measures: Efficacy was prospectively assessed by the responder rate in the sixth month of stimulation compared with baseline; safety and additional end points were assessed after device implantation and during the stimulation period. Results: Of the 34 adult patients enrolled at 6 German and 1 Belgian investigational site, 33 (mean [SD] age, 34.6 [13.5] years; 18 male patients [54.5%]) received the neurostimulation device implant. A total of 32 patients underwent combined high-frequency direct current-like stimulation at least until the 8-month postimplant follow-up visit. After 6 months of stimulation, 17 of 32 patients (53.1%) were responders to treatment with at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with baseline, corresponding to a significant median seizure reduction by 52% (95% CI, 0.37%-0.76%; P < .001). No device- or procedure-related serious adverse events were reported (0; 95% CI, 0%-10.58%). There were no significant alterations in cognition, mood, or overall quality of life. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this pooled analysis of 2 nonrandomized uncontrolled trials suggest that FCS with a novel neurostimulation device was associated with an effective reduction in seizure frequency in patients with drug-refractory focal epilepsy and may offer a promising treatment option for patients with a predominant epileptic focus. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00015918 and DRKS00017833, respectively, and jointly under PROSPERO: CRD42021266440.
Assuntos
Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos , Epilepsias Parciais , Epilepsia , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Prospectivos , Projetos Piloto , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsias Parciais/terapia , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/terapia , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Epilepsy is a challenging multifactorial disorder with a complex genetic background. Our current understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of epilepsy has substantially increased due to animal model studies, including canine studies, but additional basic and clinical research is required. Drug-resistant epilepsy is an important problem in both dogs and humans, since seizure freedom is not achieved with the available antiseizure medications. The evaluation and exploration of pharmacological and particularly non-pharmacological therapeutic options need to remain a priority in epilepsy research. Combined efforts and sharing knowledge and expertise between human medical and veterinary neurologists are important for improving the treatment outcomes or even curing epilepsy in dogs. Such interactions could offer an exciting approach to translate the knowledge gained from people and rodents to dogs and vice versa. In this article, a panel of experts discusses the similarities and knowledge gaps in human and animal epileptology, with the aim of establishing a common framework and the basis for future translational epilepsy research.
Assuntos
Doenças do Cão , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos , Epilepsia , Neurologia , Humanos , Animais , Cães , Doenças do Cão/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia/veterinária , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/veterinária , Resultado do Tratamento , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
AIMS: The blue light-sensitive chloride-conducting opsin, stGtACR2, provides potent optogenetic silencing of neurons. The present study investigated whether activation of stGtACR2 in granule cells of the dentate gyrus (DG) inhibits epileptic afterdischarges in a rat model. METHODS: Rats were bilaterally injected with 0.9 µl of AAV2/7-CaMKIIα-stGtACR2-fusionred in the DG. Three weeks later, afterdischarges were recorded from the DG by placing an optrode at the injection site and a stimulation electrode in the perforant path (PP). Afterdischarges were evoked every 10 min by unilateral electrical stimulation of the PP (20 Hz, 10 s). During every other afterdischarge, the DG was illuminated for 5 or 30 s, first ipsilaterally and then bilaterally to the PP stimulation. The line length metric of the afterdischarges was compared between illumination conditions. RESULTS: Ipsilateral stGtACR2 activation during afterdischarges decreased the local field potential line length only during illumination and specifically at the illuminated site but did not reduce afterdischarge duration. Bilateral illumination did not terminate the afterdischarges. CONCLUSION: Optogenetic inhibition of excitatory neurons using the blue-light sensitive chloride channel stGtACR2 reduced the amplitude of electrically induced afterdischarges in the DG at the site of illumination, but this local inhibitory effect was insufficient to reduce the duration of the afterdischarge.
Assuntos
Canais de Cloreto , Epilepsia , Ratos , Animais , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Canais de Cloreto/farmacologia , Hipocampo , Neurônios , Estimulação ElétricaRESUMO
Introduction: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may have anti-epileptic effects, especially in patients with neocortical lesions. Initial clinical trials demonstrated that the duration of the seizure reducing effect is relatively short-lived. In the context of a chronic condition like epilepsy, theta burst stimulation (TBS) may represent a potential solution in optimizing treatment practicality and durability as it was demonstrated to be associated with longer-lasting after-effects. TBS has been studied extensively in diverse neuropsychiatric conditions, but a therapeutic TBS protocol has not previously been applied in epilepsy patients. Materials and methods: We performed a prospective open-label pilot study of 4-day accelerated continuous TBS (cTBS) treatment in patients with neocortical drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). A treatment session consisted of 5 cTBS trains, each comprising 600 pulses presented in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 ms, delivered at 10-min intertrain-intervals, targeted over the epileptic focus (EF) using a neuronavigation-guided figure-of-8 coil. Safety and feasibility, and seizure frequency were assessed as primary and secondary endpoints, respectively, over a 4-week baseline period, a 1-week treatment period and a 7-week follow-up period, using adverse event logging, electro-encephalography, cognitive, and psychological questionnaires and a seizure diary kept by the patients and/or caregivers. Results: Seven subjects (4M:3F; median age 48, interquartile ranges 25) underwent the treatment protocol. Adverse events were reported in all subjects but were mild and transient. No clinical or electrographic seizures were evoked during or immediately following stimulation. No deterioration was found in cognition nor in psycho-emotional well-being following treatment. Treatment burden was acceptable, but seems to depend on clinical effect, duration of ongoing effect and stimulation site. Median weekly seizure frequency and ratio of seizure-free weeks did not change significantly in this small patient cohort. Conclusion: We report the results of the first ever trial of cTBS as a treatment for neocortical DRE. A 4-day accelerated cTBS protocol over the EF appears safe and feasible. Although the design and sample size of this open-label pilot study is unfit to reliably identify a therapeutic effect, results encourage further exploration of cTBS as an anti-epileptic treatment and potential optimization compared to conventional rTMS in a dedicated randomized controlled trial. (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02635633).
RESUMO
Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, races across academia and industry have been initiated to identify and develop disease modifying or preventative therapeutic strategies has been initiated. The primary focus has been on pharmacological treatment of the immune and respiratory system and the development of a vaccine. The hyperinflammatory state ("cytokine storm") observed in many cases of COVID-19 indicates a prognostically negative disease progression that may lead to respiratory distress, multiple organ failure, shock, and death. Many critically ill patients continue to be at risk for significant, long-lasting morbidity or mortality. The human immune and respiratory systems are heavily regulated by the central nervous system, and intervention in the signaling of these neural pathways may permit targeted therapeutic control of excessive inflammation and pulmonary bronchoconstriction. Several technologies, both invasive and non-invasive, are available and approved for clinical use, but have not been extensively studied in treatment of the cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients. This manuscript provides an overview of the role of the nervous system in inflammation and respiration, the current understanding of neuromodulatory techniques from preclinical and clinical studies and provides a rationale for testing non-invasive neuromodulation to modulate acute systemic inflammation and respiratory dysfunction caused by SARS-CoV-2 and potentially other pathogens. The authors of this manuscript have co-founded the International Consortium on Neuromodulation for COVID-19 to advocate for and support studies of these technologies in the current coronavirus pandemic.
RESUMO
We report the design, synthesis, and validation of the novel compound photocaged N6-cyclopentyladenosine (cCPA) to achieve precisely localized and timed release of the parent adenosine A1 receptor agonist CPA using 405 nm light. Gi protein-coupled A1 receptors (A1Rs) modulate neurotransmission via pre- and post-synaptic routes. The dynamics of the CPA-mediated effect on neurotransmission, characterized by fast activation and slow recovery, make it possible to implement a closed-loop control paradigm. The strength of neurotransmission is monitored as the amplitude of stimulus-evoked local field potentials. It is used for feedback control of light to release CPA. This system makes it possible to regulate neurotransmission to a pre-defined level in acute hippocampal brain slices incubated with 3 µM cCPA. This novel approach of closed-loop photopharmacology holds therapeutic potential for fine-tuned control of neurotransmission in diseases associated with neuronal hyperexcitability.
Assuntos
Agonistas do Receptor A1 de Adenosina , Receptor A1 de Adenosina , Agonistas do Receptor A1 de Adenosina/farmacologia , Retroalimentação , Hipocampo/metabolismo , Receptor A1 de Adenosina/metabolismo , Transmissão Sináptica , Xantinas/farmacologiaRESUMO
Epilepsy affects about 1% of the population. Approximately one third of patients with epilepsy are drug-resistant (DRE). Resective surgery is an effective treatment for DRE, yet invasive, and not all DRE patients are suitable resective surgery candidates. Focused ultrasound, a novel non-invasive neurointerventional method is currently under investigation as a treatment alternative for DRE. By emitting one or more ultrasound waves, FUS can target structures in the brain at millimeter resolution. High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) leads to ablation of tissue and could therefore serve as a non-invasive alternative for resective surgery. It is currently under investigation in clinical trials following the approval of HIFU for essential tremor and Parkinson's disease. Low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) can modulate neuronal activity and could be used to lower cortical neuronal hyper-excitability in epilepsy patients in a non-invasive manner. The seizure-suppressive effect of LIFU has been studied in several preclinical trials, showing promising results. Further investigations are required to demonstrate translation of preclinical results to human subjects.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Whiplash injuries typically occur from a motor vehicle collision and lead to chronic whiplash-associated disorders (CWAD) in 20% to 50% of cases. Changes in neurotransmission, metabolism, and networks seem to play a role in the pathogenic mechanism of CWAD. OBJECTIVES: To further elucidate the functional brain alterations, a neurophysiological study was performed to investigate the somatosensory processing of CWAD patients by comparing the event-related potentials (ERPs) resulting from electrical nociceptive stimulation between patients suffering from CWAD and healthy controls (HC). STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: University Hospital in Ghent. METHODS: In this case-control study (CWAD patients/HC: 50/50), ankle and wrist electrical pain thresholds (EPT), and amplitude and latency of the event-related potentials (ERPs) resulting from 20 electrical stimuli were investigated. Correlations between the ERP characteristics, EPT, self-reported pain, disability, pain catastrophizing, and self-reported symptoms of central sensitization were investigated. RESULTS: Only the latency of the P3 component after left wrist stimulation (t = -2.283; P = 0.023) differed between both groups. In CWAD patients, the ankle EPT correlated with the amplitude of the corresponding P1 (rho s = 0.293; P = 0.044) and P3 (rho s = 0.306; P = 0.033), as well as with the amplitude of the P3 to left wrist stimulation (rho s = 0.343; P = 0.017). Self-reported symptoms of CS correlated with right wrist P3 amplitude (rho s = 0.308; P = 0.030) and latency (rho s = -0.341; P = 0.015), and the worst pain reported during the past week was correlated with left wrist P1 latency (rho s = 0.319; P = 0.029). LIMITATIONS: Although the inclusion criteria stated that CWAD patients had to report a moderate-to-severe pain-related disability, 8 of the included CWAD patients (that scored above this threshold in the inclusion questionnaire), scored below the required cutoff at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The CWAD patients did not show signs of hypersensitivity, but their ERP characteristics were related to the intensity of the applied stimulus, self-reported symptoms of CS, and the worst pain reported during the past week.