A simple, organized web-based system improved the transfer efficiency and patient outcomes for endovascular thrombectomy in regional stroke network.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a time-sensitive treatment for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. To optimize transfer efficiency, a web-based platform was introduced in the Tainan Stroke Network (TSN). We assessed its application and effectiveness in regional stroke care. METHOD: This new web-based platform containing a questionnaire-style interface was introduced on October 1, 2021. To assess the transfer efficiency and patient outcomes, acute stroke patients transferred from PSCs to CSC for EVT from April 01, 2020, to December 30, 2022, were enrolled. The patients were classified into the traditional transferal pathway (TTP) group and the new transferal pathway (NTP) group depending on mode of transfer. Patient characteristics, time segments after stroke onset and outcome were compared between groups. RESULT: A total of 104 patients were enrolled, with 77 in the TTP group and 27 in the NTP group. Compared to the TTP group, the NTP group had a significantly shorter onset-to-CSC door time (TTP vs. NTP: 267 vs. 198 min; p = 0.041) and a higher EVT rate (TTP vs. NTP: 18.2% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.002). Among EVT patients, those in the NTP group had a significantly shorter CSC door-to-puncture time (TTP vs. NTP: 131.5 vs. 110 min; p = 0.029). The NTP group had a higher rate of good functional outcomes at 3 months (TTP vs. NTP: 21% vs. 61.5%; p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: This new web-based EVT transfer system provides notable improvements in clinical outcomes, transfer efficiency, and EVT execution for potential EVT candidates without markedly changing the regional stroke care paradigm.

Hypotension, bedridden, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia and elevated serum creatinine predict mortality in geriatric patients with fever.

AIM: The geriatric population (aged ≥65 years) accounts for 12-24% of all emergency department (ED) visits. Of them, 10% have a fever, 70-90% will be admitted and 7-10% of will die within a month. Therefore, mortality prediction and appropriate disposition after ED treatment are of great concern for geriatric patients with fever. We tried to identify independent mortality predictors of geriatric patients with fever, and combine these predictors to predict their mortality. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive geriatric patients visiting the ED between 1 June and 21 July 2010 with the following criteria of fever: a tympanic temperature ≥37.2°C or a baseline temperature elevated ≥1.3°C. We used 30-day mortality as the primary end-point. RESULTS: A total of 330 patients were enrolled. Hypotension, bedridden, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia and serum creatinine >2 mg/dL, but not age, were independently associated with 30-day mortality. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) ranged from 18.2% to 90.9%, 34.7% to 100%, 9.0% to 100% and 94.5% to 98.2%, respectively, depending on how many predictors there were. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day mortality increased with the number of independent mortality predictors. With at least four predictors, 100% of the patients died within 30 days. With none of the predictors, just 1.8% died. These findings might help physicians make decisions about geriatric patients with fever.

Geriatric Fever Score: a new decision rule for geriatric care.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating geriatric patients with fever is time-consuming and challenging. We investigated independent mortality predictors of geriatric patients with fever and developed a prediction rule for emergency care, critical care, and geriatric care physicians to classify patients into mortality risk and disposition groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive geriatric patients (≥65 years old) visiting the emergency department (ED) of a university-affiliated medical center between June 1 and July 21, 2010, were enrolled when they met the criteria of fever: a tympanic temperature ≥37.2°C or a baseline temperature elevated ≥1.3°C. Thirty-day mortality was the primary endpoint. Internal validation with bootstrap re-sampling was done. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty geriatric patients were enrolled. We found three independent mortality predictors: Leukocytosis (WBC >12,000 cells/mm3), Severe coma (GCS ≤ 8), and Thrombocytopenia (platelets <150 10(3)/mm3) (LST). After assigning weights to each predictor, we developed a Geriatric Fever Score that stratifies patients into two mortality-risk and disposition groups: low (4.0%) (95% CI: 2.3-6.9%): a general ward or treatment in the ED then discharge and high (30.3%) (95% CI: 17.4-47.3%): consider the intensive care unit. The area under the curve for the rule was 0.73. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the Geriatric Fever Score is a simple and rapid rule for predicting 30-day mortality and classifying mortality risk and disposition in geriatric patients with fever, although external validation should be performed to confirm its usefulness in other clinical settings. It might help preserve medical resources for patients in greater need.

Comorbidities and complications influence the diagnosis and management of geriatric supraglottitis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the differences in the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of supraglottitis between geriatric and nongeriatric adults over a 30-month period. METHODS: All adult patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected supraglottitis and who underwent laryngoscopy for confirmation were included. We collected the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of these patients and compared geriatric (≥60 years old) and nongeriatric (12-59 years old) groups in terms of these data. RESULTS: Eighty-one geriatric patients and 205 nongeriatric patients were reviewed during the study period. The accuracies of the clinical suspicions of supraglottitis were lower in the geriatric group (geriatric vs nongeriatric, 29.4% vs 47.3%, P = .008). The geriatric group constituted 19.8% of all supraglottitis patients. Comorbidities were discovered in 74.1% of the geriatric group and 25.4% of the nongeriatric group (P = .000). The complication rate in the geriatric patients was almost twice that of the nongeriatric patients (20.8% vs 10.8%). Additionally, the geriatric patients exhibited tendencies toward longer periods of intubation, hospitalization, and stay in the intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical characteristics and management were similar between the geriatric and nongeriatric supraglottitis patients. Nevertheless, the comorbidities altered the clinical presentations of the geriatric patients and resulted in lower diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, the elevated complication rates of the geriatric patient might have negatively affected their outcomes.