Movement disorders in Indochina: Resource challenges and future solutions.

Movement disorders are a major cause of disability worldwide and their increasing prevalence predicts a substantial future burden of care. Impactful patient care requires availability of, and accessibility to, effective medications, knowledge, and disease awareness among both medical professionals and patients, driven by skilled personnel to harness and manage resources. The highest burden of movement disorders is in low-to-middle income countries where resources are often limited and infrastructure is insufficient to meet growing demands. This article focuses on the specific challenges faced in the management and delivery of care for movement disorders in Indochina, the mainland region of Southeast Asia comprising the neighboring countries of Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam. The first Indochina Movement Disorders Conference was held in August 2022 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, to provide a platform to better understand the situation in the region. Future management of movement disorders in Indochina will require progressive adaptation of existing practices to reflect modern approaches to care delivery. Digital technologies offer an opportunity to strengthen these processes and address the challenges identified in the region. Ultimately, a long-term collaborative approach by regional healthcare providers is key.

Management of epilepsy in Laos: Perceptions of healthcare professionals from Vientiane Capital province and traditional healers in Southern Laos.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Traditional practices are deeply rooted in Lao people's perceptions and beliefs about health and illness.The objective of the study was to understand the perceptions of healthcare professionals and traditional healers regarding the management of epilepsy in Laos, and their reciprocal views. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE: An observational study was carried out in two areas of Laos from February to May 2017. Semi directive questionnaires were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data. Semiotic square was carried out to highlight relationships between attitudes of traditional healers and healthcare professionals. For quantitative approach, the proportions were reported, and the test used was Fisher's test for nominal variables. The mean and standard deviation expressed the continuous variables and the Student's t-test was used. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Epilepsy was cited by 90.9% of traditional healers as a convulsive disease with saliva or urine, and herbal medicines were predominantly used (86.4%) to treat it. Few healthcare professionals (26.5%) pointed out that they knew remedies to treat epilepsy other than antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and 76.5% of healthcare professionals mentioned that epilepsy was a disease which only AEDs could treat. On the other hand, 54.5% of traditional healers confirmed a traditional remedy could cure completely epilepsy through long-term use. Ninety percent of traditional healers said the collaboration with healthcare professionals was a good idea and 44.1% of the healthcare professionals group said was complicated.The combination of these medicines for the management of epilepsy needs to be adapted to Lao's medical context.

Availability, affordability, and quality of essential antiepileptic drugs in Lao PDR.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is a chronic condition treatable by cost-effective antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), but limited access to treatment was documented. The availability and affordability of good quality of AEDs play a significant role in access to good health care. This study aimed to assess the availability, affordability, and quality of long-term AEDs in Lao PDR. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was performed in both public and private drug supply chains in urban and rural areas in Lao PDR. Data on AEDs availability and price were obtained through drug suppliers. Affordability was estimated as the number of day wages the lowest-paid government employee must work to purchase a monthly treatment. Samples of AEDs were collected, and the quality of AEDs was assessed through Medicine Quality Assessment Reporting Guidelines. RESULTS: Out of 237 outlets visited, only 50 outlets (21.1% [95% CI 16.1-26.8]) had at least one AED available. The availability was significantly different between urban (24.9%) and rural areas (10.0%), P = .017. Phenobarbital 100 mg was the most available (14.3%); followed by sodium valproate 200 mg (9.7%), phenytoin 100 mg (9.7%), and carbamazepine 200 mg (8.9%). In provincial/district hospitals and health centers, AEDs were provided free of charge. In other healthcare facilities, phenytoin 100 mg and phenobarbital 100 mg showed the best affordability (1.0 and 1.2 day wages, respectively) compared to carbamazepine 200 mg (2.3 days) and other AEDs. No sample was identified as counterfeit, but 15.0% [95% CI 7.1-26.6] of samples were classified as of poor quality. SIGNIFICANCE: We quantified and qualified the various factors contributing to the high treatment gap in Lao PDR, adding to diagnostic issues (not assessed here). Availability remains very low and phenobarbital which is the most available and affordable AED was the worst in terms of quality. A drug policy addressing epilepsy treatment gap would reduce these barriers.

Addressing knowledge gaps in Parkinson's disease: a report on the Movement Disorder Society's Centre-to-Centre initiative to improve Parkinson's disease services in Lao People's Democratic Republic.

BACKGROUND: Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) has only nine neurologists for seven million people; none have formal training in Parkinson's disease (PD). Medical specialists require sufficient PD knowledge to provide high-quality care. METHODS: This study outlines a Centre-to-Centre programme for developing PD expertise in underserved regions through a tailored two-year educational enterprise between an established movement disorder mentor centre at Chulalongkorn University in Thailand and mentee centres in Lao PDR. Background knowledge of 80 Laotian physicians was assessed using a validated PD knowledge questionnaire containing 26 questions divided into 3 sections (diagnosis, therapeutic options, disease course) before and immediately after one-day kick-start training. Responses were compared across physicians' demographic groups. RESULTS: Of 80 respondents, 50 (62.5%) were board-certified physicians, of which 27 (54%) specialised in internal medicine. Apparent knowledge gaps were shown by a 51.2% correct response rate for total score, 52.8% for diagnosis, 50.6% for therapeutic options, and 48.2% for disease course. No significant differences in total score or any domain sub-scores between neurologists and other specialties were found. Many did not know which non-motor symptoms could occur as prodromal symptoms or late in course of PD. Incorrect responses mainly reflected a lack of knowledge of the impact of medication on disease. Total and domain sub-scores significantly improved after the course (p < 0.05, each). The size of difference of the means was significant for the total score (d = 0.82), therapeutic option (d = 0.56), and disease course (d = 0.68) sub-scores. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement of PD knowledge amongst Laotian physicians is demonstrated after a training course, focusing on practical management of PD. Our findings highlight the importance of continued medical education, especially PD-specific training.

Delivering patient-centered care in Parkinson's disease: Challenges and consensus from an international panel.

An international panel of movement disorders specialists explored the views and perceptions of people with Parkinson's disease (PD) about their condition and its treatment, including the potential mismatch between the clinician's view of the patient's condition and their own view of what aspects of the disease most affect their daily lives. The initiative was focused on Asian countries, so participants comprised experts in the management of PD from key centers in Asia, with additional insight provided by European and the North American movement disorders experts. Analysis of peer-reviewed publications on patient perceptions of PD and the factors that they consider important to their wellbeing identified several contributing factors to the mismatch of views, including gaps in knowledge of PD and its treatment, an understanding of the clinical heterogeneity of PD, and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care. The faculty proposed options to bridge these gaps to ensure that PD patients receive the personalized treatment they need to achieve the best possible outcomes. It was considered essential to improve patient knowledge about PD and its treatment, as well as increasing the awareness of clinicians of PD heterogeneity in presentation and treatment response. A multidisciplinary and shared-care approach to PD was needed alongside the use of patient-centered outcome measures in clinical trials and clinical practice to better capture the patient experience and improve the delivery of individualized therapy.

Community-based management of epilepsy in Southeast Asia: Two intervention strategies in Lao PDR and Cambodia.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy affects more than 50 million people worldwide, 80% of whom live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In Southeast Asia, the prevalence is moderate (6‰), and the main public health challenge is reducing the treatment gap, which reaches more than 90% in rural areas. METHODS: This 12-month comparative study (intervention vs. control areas) assessed the community effectiveness of two different strategies for the identification and home follow-up of people with epilepsy by Domestic Health Visitors for epilepsy (DHVes). In Lao PDR, DHVes were health center staff covering several villages via monthly visits; in Cambodia, DHVes were health volunteers living in the villages. FINDINGS: At baseline, the treatment gap was >95% in Lao PDR and 100% in Cambodia. After 12 months, the treatment gap in Lao PDR decreased by 5·5% (range: 4·0-12·2) in the intervention area and 0·5% (range: 0·4-0·8) in the control area (p<0·0001). In Cambodia, the treatment gap decreased by 34·9% (range: 29·0-44·1) in the intervention area and 8·1% (range: 6·7-10·2) in the control area (p<0·0001). Among the PWEs followed at home by the DHVes, the proportion adhering to drug treatment was 85·2% in Lao PDR and 78·1% in Cambodia. The cost associated with strategy implemented in Cambodia, compared with the control area, was lower than the cost associated with strategy implemented in Lao PDR." INTERPRETATION: The treatment gap was significantly reduced with both intervention strategies, but the effect was larger in Cambodia. The results of this cost analysis pave the way for scaling-up in rural areas of Lao PDR and Cambodia, and experimental adaptation in other LMICs. FUNDING: The study was funded by the Global Health Department of Sanofi and Grand Challenges Canada (grant number 0325-04).

Differences in knowledge about epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs among pharmacy-dispensing workers in Cambodia and in Lao PDR.

Epilepsy is the most common neurological disorder encountered in primary care in Southeast Asia. People with epilepsy require long-term therapy management. Nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been identified as a major factor in suboptimal control of epilepsy. Pharmacies offer patients a first-line point of contact with the healthcare system. Many pharmacies operate with limited or nonqualified human resources that can lead to insufficient knowledge, inappropriate supply of medicines, and insufficient counseling. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the qualification and knowledge concerning epilepsy and AEDs among pharmacy-dispensing workers who sell drugs to people with epilepsy. METHOD: A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted in public and private pharmacies, in both urban and rural areas of Cambodia and Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR). The knowledge was collected through a questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 180 respondents from 123 outlets in the two countries were included in this study. A proportion of 40.8% (31) of respondents in Cambodia and 38.5% (40) in Lao PDR were pharmacists, followed by sellers who did not received any healthcare training with a proportion of 18.4% (14) in Cambodia compared to 20.2% (21) in Lao PDR. Head trauma was cited as the main cause of epilepsy by 72.4% (55) in Cambodia and 27.2% (28) in Lao PDR (p < 0.001). Epilepsy was considered as a contagious disease by 6.6% (5) of respondents in Cambodia compared to 18.4% (19) in Lao PDR (p = 0.03). Eighty-seven percent (66) of respondents in Cambodia knew at least one long-term AED versus 67.3% (70) in Lao PDR (p = 0.003). Phenobarbital was mentioned in more than 90.0% of cases in both countries. In overall, 15.4% (21) thought that if seizures are controlled for some months, people with epilepsy could stop taking their AEDs. Only one respondent from Lao PDR was aware of drug-drug interaction between AEDs and oral contraception. CONCLUSION: An educational intervention should be implemented to improve the knowledge of epilepsy and AEDs for pharmacy-dispensing workers. This could include advice for all pharmacy-dispensing workers in order to improve AED management and follow-up of therapeutic adherence.

Underutilization of epilepsy surgery in ASEAN countries.

PURPOSE: This survey was performed to determine the availability of epilepsy surgery, and understand the limiting factors to epilepsy surgery in ASEAN countries with total of 640 million population. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was completed by national representatives in all ASEAN countries (Brunei, Cambodia, East Timor, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam). RESULTS: Overall facilities for initial epilepsy pre-surgical evaluation are available in most countries, but further non-invasive and invasive investigations are limited. Three countries (Brunei, Cambodia, and East Timor) have no epilepsy center, and 2 countries (Laos, Myanmar) have level 2 centers doing tumor surgery only. Level-3 epilepsy centers are available in 6 countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippine, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam); only 5 countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippine, Singapore, Thailand) has at least one level-4 epilepsy care facility. Indonesia with 261 million population only has one level 3 and another level 4 center. The costs of presurgical evaluation and brain surgery vary within and among the countries. The main barriers towards epilepsy surgery in ASEAN include lack of expertise, funding and facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Epilepsy surgery is underutilized in ASEAN with low number of level 3 centers, and limited availability of advanced presurgical evaluation. Lack of expertise, facilities and funding may be the key factors contributing to the underutilization.

Explanatory factors of adherence to community-based management of epilepsy in Lao PDR.

RELEVANCE: A low level of knowledge about epilepsy among health workers, a context of stigmatizing sociocultural beliefs, and a low availability of antiepileptic drugs in Lao People's Democratic Republic (PDR) are major gaps in the medical management of people with epilepsy in this country. OBJECTIVES: The principal objective of the study was to identify the associated factors of adherence to community healthcare structures in Lao PDR. Specific objectives were to evaluate patients' adherence status, practices and knowledge about epilepsy and its care, and factors influencing decision-making on therapeutic interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was an observational cross-sectional survey about knowledge, attitudes, and practices, handled from February to May 2016. Eighty-seven people with epilepsy were identified in two areas in the periphery of Vientiane Capital through an active screening in villages and homes. Semidirective questionnaires were conducted to collect quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative analysis included a comparison of adherent vs. nonadherent people with epilepsy, using Chi-square or Fisher's test. Advanced qualitative lexical analysis was carried out on the open-ended questions. RESULTS: Sixty-two people with epilepsy were included and the adherence rate to community care was 67.7%. The only sociodemographic variable that differed significantly between adherent and nonadherent members was the income level (p = 0.015): the wealthiest class of people with epilepsy did not adhere to community healthcare. Eleven percent of people with epilepsy thought that epilepsy was contagious, 80.6% that medication may reduce epilepsy seizure rates, and 33.9% that it was possible to cure epilepsy permanently. Physicians informed about the disease in 69.0% of adherent people with epilepsy and in 40.0% of nonadherent ones (p = 0.029), whereas villagers were involved in 29.0% and 50.0% of cases, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups for the prescribed antiepileptic drugs (p = 0.012): phenobarbital covered 73.8% of adherent people with epilepsy but only 40% of nonadherent ones. Half of nonadherent people with epilepsy went regularly to a central hospital in the Vientiane Capital, 15.0% went to Thailand, and 10.0% practiced self-medication in occasional mobilities. CONCLUSION: A wider range of antiepileptic drugs at a reduced cost and the promotion of adherence to community healthcare would allow a better management of people with epilepsy in Lao PDR.