Blood pressure variability within a single visit and all-cause mortality.

BACKGROUND: Within-visit variability of repeated sequential readings of blood pressure (BP) is an important phenomenon that may affect precision of BP measurement and thus decision making concerning BP-related risk and hypertension management. However, limited data exist concerning predictive ability of within-visit BP variability for clinical outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between the variability of three repeated office BP measurements and the risk of all-cause mortality, independent of BP levels. METHODS: Data collected through the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analysed. NHANES is a program of studies designed to assess health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States. A complete set of three sequential BP measurements, together with survival status, were available for 24969 individuals (age 46.8±;19.3 years, 49% males). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the prognostic ability of the examined demographic, clinical, and haemodynamic indices. RESULTS: Among various examined indices of variability of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure measurements, the standard deviation of DBP (DBPSD) was the stronger independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio 1.064, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.011-1.12) after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, SBP, heart rate, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia, and cardiovascular events. CONCLUSION: Within-visit variability of three sequential office DBP readings may allow for the identification of high-risk patients better than mean SBP and DBP levels. The predictive value of within-visit BP variability and methods to improve its clinical application are worthy of further research.

Biomarkers as a guide of medical treatment in cardiovascular diseases.

There is increasing interest in utilizing novel markers of cardiovascular disease risk and consequently, there is a need to assess the value of their use. In this paper, we will review the role of biomarkers in acute coronary syndromes, heart failure and risk stratification for cardiovascular events as guide for treatment scribing. In particular, high sensitivity assays for troponin evaluation detect with greater precision patients with elevated troponin. Therefore, direct and appropriate management is succeeded in these patients with reduction of complications due to earlier treatment, as well. Regarding heart failure, randomized trials that have evaluated biomarker guided treatment approach have not succeeded in establishing specific results for natriuretic peptides (BNP, NT-proBNP) use in terms of therapy guidance. Apart from them, a variety of novel or already used biomarkers, have been tested by small trials for heart failure management, without however, managing to dominate in every day care. Finally, as far as risk stratification for cardiovascular events is concerned, hsCRP has proved to be a strong but doubted biomarker. Therefore, lifestyle and behavioral modification remain the cornerstone of primary prevention.