Clinical use of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

The aim of endocrine therapy is to reduce the estrogenic stimulus for tumour growth. After failure of tamoxifen--the standard "first-line" hormonotherapy for advanced breast cancer (ABC)--the most frequently prescribed endocrine therapies are progestins and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) ("second-line" hormonotherapy). Estrogen deprivation through AIs provides effective treatment of hormone-dependent ABC in postmenopausal (PMP) women. Over the past few years, the goals of our research programme were to develop more potent, more selective and better tolerated AIs than our first AI, aminoglutethimide (AG). Lentaron (4-hydroxyandrostenedione, formestane), a highly selective steroidal compound was the first of the new AIs to be used in clinical trials. It is a substrate analogue, administered as an i.m. injection every 2 weeks. It is effective in the treatment of ABC with an objective response rate (ORR) similar to tamoxifen and megestrol acetate (MA) and is generally well tolerated; rare instances of injection site reactions have been reported. Afema (fadrozole HCl), a non-steroidal AI is active orally, and effectively suppresses estrogen levels in PMP women, but it is not completely selective for aromatase when administered at higher than therapeutic doses. At the therapeutic dose of 1 mg twice a day it has an anti-tumour efficacy similar to MA, a good tolerability and no clinically relevant effects on other hormones of the endocrine system. Letrozole is the fourth of our AIs in clinical development. It is a non-steroidal, achiral, orally active, potent and highly selective competitive AI. Clinical endocrine studies have shown that the dose of 0.5 mg a day is the lowest dose achieving maximum estrogen suppression. Over a wide dose range, a lack of clinically relevant effects on other hormones of the endocrine system has confirmed its high selectivity. In four phase Ib/IIa studies in PMP patients with ABC who failed previous therapy, letrozole produced ORRs of 9, 31, 33 and 36%. One phase IIb/III study has been completed and two others are ongoing, comparing two doses of letrozole with MA or AG to confirm the anti-tumour efficacy of letrozole in the treatment of ABC in PMP women after treatment with anti-estrogens. Preliminary results from the completed trial show that letrozole 2.5 mg is superior to 0.5 mg in terms of ORR, time to progression and time to treatment failure, and is superior to the standard dose of MA in terms of ORR and tolerability. Therefore letrozole 2.5 mg can be recommended as a first choice for the treatment of PMP patients with hormone receptor-positive or unknown ABC after anti-estrogen therapy.

Absolute bioavailability of letrozole in healthy postmenopausal women.

Letrozole is a new non-steroidal inhibitor of the aromatase enzyme system. It is currently under development for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Absolute bioavailability of letrozole when given orally as one 2.5 mg film-coated tablet in comparison to the same dose given intravenously as a bolus injection was studied in 12 healthy postmenopausal women. Letrozole absolute systemic bioavailability after p.o. administration was 99.9 +/- 16.3%. Elimination of letrozole was slow. Total-body clearance of letrozole from plasma after i.v. administration was low (2.21 L h-1). The calculated distribution volume at steady state (1.87 L kg-1) suggests a rather high tissue distribution. Biotransformation of letrozole is the main elimination mechanism with the glucuronide conjugate of the secondary alcohol metabolite being the predominant species found in urine. The two study treatments were tolerated equally well.

Dose-ranging antiemetic evaluation of the serotonin antagonist RG 12915 in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: RG 12915 is a potent, selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with a biologic half-life of 11-20 hours. RG 12915 prevents cisplatin-induced emesis in ferrets at doses of 0.03 mg/kg. Animal toxicology studies permitted safe testing in humans at doses of up to 2.0 mg/kg. This dose-ranging trial of intravenous RG 12915 was performed to determine the optimal dosage and adverse effects and to observe for antiemetic effects in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy. METHODS: Twenty-six patients receiving chemotherapy likely to cause vomiting received a single intravenous dose of RG 12915 at a rate of 3 ml/minute beginning 60 minutes before chemotherapy. Four dose levels were explored: 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. All adverse effects were mild and transient and included discomfort at the infusion site, hyperglycemia, headache, serum aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) elevations, and sedation. Antiemetic efficacy was seen in patients receiving cisplatin at doses of greater than or equal to 100 mg/m2. CONCLUSION: RG 12915 can be administered safely at the dose levels explored. Single intravenous doses of RG 12915 prevented or lessened emesis caused by chemotherapy, including cisplatin given at doses of greater than or equal to 100 mg/m2. RG 12915 warrants further testing. Of the doses tested, the 2.0 mg/kg dose is the most appropriate for further exploration.

Phase I trial of Taxotere: five-day schedule.

BACKGROUND: Taxotere, a semisynthetic compound structurally related to taxol, has a broad spectrum of activity in murine transplantable tumors; in the B16 melanoma model, it caused a total log cell kill 2.5 times greater than that caused by taxol at equitoxic doses. PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I study of Taxotere (a) to determine its qualitative and quantitative toxic effects and a starting dose for phase II trials, (b) to investigate its clinical pharmacology, and (c) to document its antitumor activity. METHODS: Taxotere was given as a 1-hour infusion at a starting dose of 1 mg/m2 per day for 5 consecutive days. The 5-day course of therapy was repeated every 21 days. Thirty-nine cancer patients with advanced disease were entered in the study; at least three patients were entered at each dose level. Initial dose escalations were planned at 100% increments until biologic activity was observed; subsequent escalations were planned at 50% increments until grade 2 toxicity (the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria) occurred and then at 25% increments until the maximum tolerated dose was established. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were entered in the study. Successive dose levels used were 1, 4, 8, 16, 12, and 14 mg/m2 per day. The dose-limiting toxic effects were granulocytopenia and concurrent mucositis. Grade 4 granulocytopenia associated with grade 3 mucositis developed in six of 12 patients treated at a dose of 16 mg/m2 per day, two of 10 treated at 12 mg/m2 per day, and two of eight treated at 14 mg/m2 per day. Because these toxic effects occurred concurrently, all patients so affected developed neutropenic fevers and required hospitalization. Neither cardiac nor neurologic toxic effects were noted. Anti-tumor activity was observed in six patients with ovarian cancer and in one with breast carcinoma. Although pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent between day 1 and day 5 for individual patients, considerable variation existed among those treated at the same dose level. A relationship was observed between the area under the curve for plasma concentration of drug x time (AUC) on day 1 and the percentage decrease in absolute granulocyte counts. CONCLUSION: Granulocytopenia associated with oral mucositis is the dose-limiting toxicity of this schedule. We recommended a starting dose of 14 mg/m2 per day for phase II studies of this 5-day schedule. Dose modifications on days 2-5 based on the day-1 AUC may allow individualized dosing.

Clinical experience with sorbinil--an aldose reductase inhibitor.

A considerable volume of animal pharmacologic data support the view that increased flux through the polyol pathway provides a unifying hypothesis for the major complications of diabetes. An extensive clinical program has been established to verify the extrapolation of the animal pharmacologic findings to man. Clinical data accumulated to date confirm the biochemical and electrophysiologic effects, and encouraging evidence of a drug effect in diabetic neuropathy and retinopathy has already been observed. In the large, controlled safety data base already available, the long-term clinical use of sorbinil is devoid of significant adverse effects in terms of both subjective side effects and laboratory parameters. The only clinically important adverse reaction reported to date has been a hypersensitivity reaction in the early weeks of therapy, which is similar to that seen with other hydantoins.

Aldose reductase inhibitors in clinical practice. Preliminary studies on diabetic neuropathy and retinopathy.

Extensive animal data now exist to indicate potential benefit of sorbinil in the treatment of the major complications of diabetes mellitus. A clinical programme has been constructed to explore this therapeutic potential and encouraging evidence of drug effect has already been observed in patients with neuropathy and retinopathy. Two small preliminary studies in patients with painful neuropathy have shown that clinically significant reduction of pain was more frequently achieved with sorbinil than with placebo. A 6-month study of patients with retinopathy, using vitreous fluorophotometry as the criterion of retinal damage, showed significant (p = 0.03) benefit for the sorbinil group compared with the placebo group. Drug evaluation in these areas is complex and difficult but it is anticipated that the accumulation of additional data will further substantiate the efficacy suggested by these early findings. The only clinically important adverse effect of sorbinil is the hypersensitivity reaction. This usually occurs during the initial weeks of therapy and is similar to that seen with phenytoin. The long term use of sorbinil is without significant adverse effects.

Antiemetic efficacy of levonantradol compared to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

The antiemetic efficacy of im levonantradol, a synthetic cannabinoid, given at a dose of 1 mg every 4 hours, was compared to oral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) given at a dose of 15 mg every 4 hours in a double-blind crossover study. Twenty-six patients receiving emetogenic cancer chemotherapy were evaluated. For each drug, 28% of treated patients had no nausea. The median number of emetic episodes with levonantradol was 2.0 versus 3.0 for THC (P = 0.06). Side effects occurred in 91.7% and 97.3% of levonantradol and THC patients, respectively, with drowsiness and dizziness most commonly seen. Side effects were generally well-tolerated, with only 13.9% of levonantradol and 21.6% of THC patients discontinuing treatment because of side effects. Levonantradol appears to be at least as effective an antiemetic as THC and is the only cannabinoid available for parenteral use.

Dose ranging evaluation of the antiemetic efficacy and toxicity of intramuscular levonantradol in cancer subjects with chemotherapy-induced emesis.

A phase II double-blind placebo-controlled, randomized dose-ranging trial was undertaken to determine the antiemetic efficacy and toxicity of the synthetic cannabinoid levonantradol at doses of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg. Intramuscular levonantradol was prophylactically administered in random dosing to 20 subjects with a documented history of refractory emesis due to chemotherapy in advanced cancer. The selected dose was administered prior to the chemotherapy and was serially repeated over 12 hours, and efficacy and toxicity data were evaluated for 24 hours. Significant (P less than 0.01) antiemetic activity over placebo was observed with all doses of levonantradol administered, and a dose-effect response was not observed. Doses up to 2.0 mg were well tolerated, and observed toxicity increased with increased doses and with repeated dosing. Psychomimetic effects were mild and tolerable, and the limiting side effects were somnolence and hypotension.