EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: 2023 update.

INTRODUCTION: Hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) are increasingly common with a significant impact on individuals and society. Non-pharmacological treatments are considered essential to reduce pain and improve function and quality of life. EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee OA were published in 2013. Given the large number of subsequent studies, an update is needed. METHODS: The Standardised Operating Procedures for EULAR recommendations were followed. A multidisciplinary Task Force with 25 members representing 14 European countries was established. The Task Force agreed on an updated search strategy of 11 research questions. The systematic literature review encompassed dates from 1 January 2012 to 27 May 2022. Retrieved evidence was discussed, updated recommendations were formulated, and research and educational agendas were developed. RESULTS: The revised recommendations include two overarching principles and eight evidence-based recommendations including (1) an individualised, multicomponent management plan; (2) information, education and self-management; (3) exercise with adequate tailoring of dosage and progression; (4) mode of exercise delivery; (5) maintenance of healthy weight and weight loss; (6) footwear, walking aids and assistive devices; (7) work-related advice and (8) behaviour change techniques to improve lifestyle. The mean level of agreement on the recommendations ranged between 9.2 and 9.8 (0-10 scale, 10=total agreement). The research agenda highlighted areas related to these interventions including adherence, uptake and impact on work. CONCLUSIONS: The 2023 updated recommendations were formulated based on research evidence and expert opinion to guide the optimal management of hip and knee OA.

Impairment in work and activities of daily life in patients with psoriasis: results of the prospective BioCAPTURE registry.

Background: Little is known about the extent of impairments in work and activities of daily life (ADL) in patients with psoriasis, and the influence of contextual factors such as disease-related characteristics and treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to assess these impairments in patients with psoriasis who started using biologicals/small molecule inhibitors.Methods: Using data from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry, we collected patient, disease, and treatment parameters, as well as work/ADL impairments at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Changes in impairment parameters and correlations between impairment and patient/disease characteristics were assessed using generalized estimating equations.Results: We included 194 patients in our analysis. After biological initiation, disease activity decreased significantly (PASI 11.2 at baseline versus 3.9 at 12 months, p < 0.001). Work-for-pay in this cohort was lower than in the Dutch general population (53% versus 67%, p = 0.01). In patients who had work-for-pay, presenteeism improved over time (5% at baseline versus 0% at 12 months, p = 0.04). Up to half of the patients reported impairments in ADL, which did not change over time. Associations between impairments and contextual factors varied, but all impairments were associated with worse mental/physical general functioning.Conclusion: Patients with psoriasis using biologicals are less likely to have work-for-pay. Treatment improves the work productivity of employed patients, but we were unable to detect changes in ADL performance.

Long-term postoperative opioid use in orthopaedic patients.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of long-term opioid use after orthopaedic surgery varies from 1.4% to 24% and has mostly been studied with prescription data, making it difficult to estimate the size and impact of the problem. This study aims to assess the prevalence and predictors of long-term postoperative opioid use in a high volume and tertiary orthopaedic centre by using online patient reported measures. METHODS: This Dutch prospective cohort study was conducted among adult patients who underwent any type of orthopaedic surgery from June to August 2021. Six months after surgery patients were invited to complete an online survey on current opioid use and patients' willingness to taper opioids. The demographics, clinical factors and preoperative opioid use were extracted from the patient file. RESULTS: In total, 607 patients (mean age 61.2 years, 63.4% female) completed the survey. Seventy-six patients (12.5%) used opioids 6 months after surgery of which 20 (3.3%) did not use opioids before surgery. The median (Q1-Q3) postoperative daily dose after 6 months was 29.9 mg (10.0-76.1) morphine equivalents. Most of them (88.2%) wanted to taper opioids. Affected body region (OR's: 6.84-12.75) and pre-operative opioid use (OR = 35.33) were significant predictors of long-term opioid use. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of long-term postoperative opioid use was 12.5%; one in thirty patients became a new long-term opioid user. Pre-operative opioid use and affected body region were predictive for long-term opioid use. These findings, together with the observation that long-term opioid users want to taper opioids, emphasize the relevance of prevention, recognition and tapering support in the perioperative setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II. SIGNIFICANCE: Short-term opioid use can unintentionally progress to long-term opioid use. The prevalence of long-term opioid use after orthopaedic surgery varies widely and is mostly prescription-based, making it difficult to estimate the magnitude of the problem. This study assessed long-term postoperative opioid use in a full breadth orthopaedic population using patient reported measures, making conclusions much more robust. The prevalence of long-term postoperative opioid use in this study was 12.5%.

Exploration of adverse consequences of total knee arthroplasty by patients and knee specialists: a qualitative study.

Objectives: A successful outcome according to the knee specialist is not a guarantee for treatment success as perceived by patients. In this study, we aimed to explore outcome expectations and experiences of patients with OA before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery and knee specialists that might contribute to the negative appraisal of its effect, and differences in views between patients and knee specialists. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were held in Belgium and the Netherlands. Twenty-five patients (2 without indications for TKA, 11 on the waiting list for TKA and 12 postoperative TKA) and 15 knee specialists (9 orthopaedic surgeons, 1 physician assistant, 1 nurse practitioner and 4 physiotherapists) were interviewed. Conversations were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis following the grounded theory approach. Separate analyses were conducted for patients and knee specialists. Results: Patients were focused on the arduous process of getting used to the prosthesis, lingering pain, awareness of the artificial knee and limitations they experience during valued and daily activities, whereas knee specialists put emphasis on surgical failure, unexplained pain, limited walking ability and impairments that limit the physical functioning of patients. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive overview of potential adverse consequences from the perspective of both patients and knee specialists. Improving patients' awareness and expectations of adaptation to the knee prosthesis needs to be considered.

Preferences of Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders Regarding the Timing and Channel of eHealth and Factors Influencing Its Use: Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of eHealth is progressing slowly. In-depth insight into patients' preferences and needs regarding eHealth might improve its use. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe when patients want to use eHealth, how patients want to communicate and receive information digitally, and what factors influence the use of eHealth in clinical practice. METHODS: A multimethod study was conducted. Two meetings of ~5.5 hours with plenary information sessions and focus groups were held with 22 patients from the rheumatology, orthopedics, and rehabilitation departments of a Dutch hospital specialized in musculoskeletal disorders. Assignments were performed during the focus groups in which qualitative (eg, semistructured interview questions) and quantitative (ie, voting and ranking factors) data were collected. RESULTS: The way patients want to use eHealth varies between patients and moments of a patient's care pathway. Patients' digital channel preferences depended on the need for interaction with a health care provider (HCP). The interaction need is in turn influenced by the degree to which information or communication is specific to an individual patient and leads to consequences for the patient. The 5 most important factors influencing the use of eHealth were access to medical information (eg, electronic health records), perceived control over disease management, correctness and completeness of information, data security, and access to information or an HCP at any time. The 5 least important factors influencing eHealth use were help with using digital devices, having internet or equipment, digital skills, attitude or emotions toward eHealth, and societal benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Patients identified opportunities for using eHealth during all moments of their care pathway. However, preferences for eHealth varied between patients and phases in the care pathway. As a consequence, eHealth should be tailored to fit individual patients' preferences but also the need for interaction regarding different topics by offering a variety of digital channels with a gradient of interaction possibilities. Furthermore, digital skills and access to the internet might become less important to focus on in the future. Improving eHealth use by patients may be achieved by providing patients access to correct and safe (medical) information and more control over their care.

Day-to-day fluctuations of fatigue severity in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: an ecological momentary assessment approach.

Objective: The variable course of fatigue adds to the disease burden of patients with OA yet it has been poorly understood. This study aimed to describe within-person fluctuations of fatigue severity and explore its associations with pain, positive affect, negative affect, sleep, and perceived exertion of physical activity. Methods: Individuals with chronic knee pain or a clinical diagnosis of knee OA ≥40 years of age completed daily assessments about fatigue, pain, positive affect, negative affect, sleep, perceived exertion of physical activity (numeric rating scale 0-10), and overwhelming fatigue (yes/no) on a smartphone over 14 days. Within-person fluctuations of fatigue severity were described by the probability of acute changes (PACs) and s.d.s. Associations with pain, positive affect, negative affect, sleep, and perceived exertion of physical activity were explored using multilevel models. Results: Forty-nine individuals were included (mean age 63.4 years; 82% female). PACs and s.d.s of within-person daily fatigue fluctuations ranged from 0.00 to 0.80 and 0.35 to 2.95, respectively. Within-person associations of fatigue severity were moderate for positive affect [ß = -0.57 (95% CI -0.67, -0.47)], weak for pain [ß = 0.41 (95% CI 0.29, 0.53)] and negative affect [ß = 0.40 (95% CI 0.21, 0.58)], and negligible for sleep [ß = -0.13 (95% CI -0.18, -0.08)] and perceived exertion of physical activity [ß = 0.18 (95% CI 0.09, 0.26)]. Conclusion: Some individuals showed almost stable day-to-day levels of fatigue severity, whereas others experienced a substantial number of clinically relevant fluctuations. To reduce the burden of daily fatigue fluctuations, our results suggest that pain, positive and negative affect rather than sleep and perceived exertion of physical activity should be considered as potential targets.

EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological management of systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based recommendations for the non-pharmacological management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: A task force comprising 7 rheumatologists, 15 other healthcare professionals and 3 patients was established. Following a systematic literature review performed to inform the recommendations, statements were formulated, discussed during online meetings and graded based on risk of bias assessment, level of evidence (LoE) and strength of recommendation (SoR; scale A-D, A comprising consistent LoE 1 studies, D comprising LoE 4 or inconsistent studies), following the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology standard operating procedure. Level of agreement (LoA; scale 0-10, 0 denoting complete disagreement, 10 denoting complete agreement) was determined for each statement through online voting. RESULTS: Four overarching principles and 12 recommendations were developed. These concerned common and disease-specific aspects of non-pharmacological management. SoR ranged from A to D. The mean LoA with the overarching principles and recommendations ranged from 8.4 to 9.7. Briefly, non-pharmacological management of SLE and SSc should be tailored, person-centred and participatory. It is not intended to preclude but rather complement pharmacotherapy. Patients should be offered education and support for physical exercise, smoking cessation and avoidance of cold exposure. Photoprotection and psychosocial interventions are important for SLE patients, while mouth and hand exercises are important in SSc. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations will guide healthcare professionals and patients towards a holistic and personalised management of SLE and SSc. Research and educational agendas were developed to address needs towards a higher evidence level, enhancement of clinician-patient communication and improved outcomes.

Beliefs of rheumatologists and general practitioners on urate lowering therapy: a cross-sectional study.

Objective: To describe beliefs of physicians and patients in primary and secondary care about urate-lowering therapy (ULT), to examine differences in physicians' medication beliefs and to examine the association of physicians' medication beliefs with the prescribed dosage of ULT, gout outcomes and patients' medication beliefs. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among rheumatologists and general practitioners (GPs) and their patients using ULT in The Netherlands. All participants filled out the Beliefs About Medication Questionnaire (BMQ). Demographics of physicians were collected through questionnaires. Patient and disease characteristics were collected through questionnaires and electronic medical records. Differences between rheumatologists and GPs in the BMQ subscales Necessity and Concern and the necessity-concern difference (NCD) score were analysed by two-sample t-tests. Multilevel analyses were performed to examine the association of physicians' BMQ scores with the prescribed dosage of ULT, gout outcomes (number of gout flares, serum urate) and patients' BMQ scores. Results: A total of 28 rheumatologists, 443 rheumatology patients, 45 GPs and 294 GP patients were included. The mean NCD scores were 7.1 (s.d. 3.6), 4.0 (s.d. 4.0), and 4.2 (s.d. 5.0) for rheumatologists, GPs and patients, respectively. Rheumatologists scored higher on necessity beliefs [mean difference 1.4 (95% CI 0.0, 2.8)] and lower on concern beliefs [mean difference -1.7 (95% CI -2.7, -0.7)] compared with GPs. No associations between physicians' beliefs and prescribed dosage of ULT, gout outcomes or patients' beliefs were found. Conclusion: Rheumatologists had higher necessity and lower ULT concern beliefs compared with GPs and patients. Physicians' beliefs were not related to prescribed ULT dosage and patient outcomes. The role of physicians' beliefs in gout management in patients using ULT seems limited. Future qualitative research can provide more insights into physicians' views of gout management.

Exploring the perspective of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and care providers on the use of immunomodulatory drugs in infections: an interview study.

Objectives: Immunomodulatory agents are safe and effective as treatment for various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), but are associated with a slightly increased infection risk. It is uncertain whether, in the event of an infection, continuation or temporary interruption of immunomodulatory agents leads to better outcomes. Owing to this uncertainty, it is of importance to explore the perspectives of health-care providers (HCPs) and patients on this topic. In this study, we set out to identify and provide an overview of reasons for both treatment strategies. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with HCPs involved in the pharmacological treatment of IMIDs and with IMID patients using one or more immunomodulatory agent. Purposive sampling was used to enrich data variation. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached and subsequently analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results: In total, 13 HCPs and 19 IMID patients were interviewed. A wide range of reasons for both treatment strategies were identified, categorized into 10 overarching themes, including IMID characteristics, infection characteristics and the patient-HCP relationship. Conclusion: In this interview study, we identified various reasons for continuation or temporary interruption of immunomodulatory agents during infections for both IMID patients and HCPs. We found overlapping themes, such as IMID characteristics; however, the content and interpretation of these themes might differ between HCPs and patients. Both HCPs and patients mentioned that the decision for a treatment strategy is often about weighing benefits against risks (e.g. infection severity vs disease flare).

Needs and wishes for the future lower limb exoskeleton: an interview study among people with spinal cord injury with community-based exoskeleton experience.

PURPOSE: Exoskeleton use by people with complete spinal cord injury (SCI) in daily life is challenging. To optimize daily exoskeleton use, a better understanding of the purpose of use and the accompanying improvements are needed. The perspective of experienced exoskeleton users could guide design improvements. METHODS: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were held with 13 people with SCI with exoskeleton experience. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Participants expressed three future purposes of exoskeleton use: for daily activities (e.g., stair climbing), exercise (e.g., staying healthy), and social interaction (e.g., standing at parties). Exoskeleton use during daily activities was the ultimate goal. Therefore, the future exoskeleton should be: easy to use, small and lightweight, tailor made, safe, comfortable, less distinctive, durable, and affordable. Improving the ease of use was relevant for all purposes, for all participants. The other suggestions for improvement varied depending on the purpose of use and the participant. CONCLUSION: Increasingly more advanced improvements are needed to transition from an exercise purpose to social interaction, and ultimately use during daily activities. In the current study, detailed suggestions for improvements have been made. Only when multiple of these suggestions are adjusted, can the exoskeleton be used to its full potential.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe use of an exoskeleton by people with a complete spinal cord injury in daily life is still in its infancy.To optimize daily exoskeleton use, a better understanding of the purpose of use and exoskeleton improvements is needed.More advanced improvements to future exoskeletons are needed to make a transition from use as an exercise device to use during social interaction and daily activities.Improving the ease of use of future exoskeletons is considered a priority by experienced users, followed by making the exoskeleton small, lightweight, and tailor made.

Gaming for Adherence to Medication using Ehealth in Rheumatoid arthritis (GAMER) study: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect on adherence to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of a serious game that targeted implicit attitudes toward medication. METHODS: A multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) was performed with adults with RA that used DMARDs and possessed a smartphone/tablet. Control and intervention groups received care as usual. The intervention group played the serious game at will during 3 months. Game play data and online questionnaires Compliance Questionnaire on Rheumatology (CQR), Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) were collected. Primary outcome was DMARD implementation adherence operationalised as the difference in proportion of non-adherent participants (<80% taking adherence) between intervention and control group after 3 months using a Chi-squared test. Two sample t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were performed to test for differences on secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 110 intervention participants that started the study, 87 participants (79%) installed the game and had a median playtime of 9.7 hours at 3 months. Overall, 186 participants completed the study. Adherence in intervention group (63%) and control group (54%) did not differ significantly (p=0.13) at 3 months. Neither were there differences oberved in CQR continuous score, beliefs about medication (BMQ) or clinical outcomes (HAQ and RADAI). CONCLUSION: A serious game aimed at reinterpreting attitudes toward medication failed to show an effect on adherence to DMARDs or clinical outcomes in patients with RA. The game was played frequently indicating that it can be an effective channel for reaching patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7217.

Determinants of work and social participation in patients with psoriatic arthritis in the Netherlands: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis can cause pain, disability, and permanent joint damage. This can lead to impairments in work and social participation. Little is known about the extent of these impairments in routine practice. With this study, we aim to examine the extent of work and activity impairment in (subgroups of) Dutch patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and to examine determinants associated with this impairment. METHODS: This is an observational study using data collected from the electronic health records of PsA patients treated at the Sint Maartenskliniek, the Netherlands. Data about work and activity impairment were collected via the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. To compare our PsA-cohort with the Dutch general population, we used age- and sex-matched data derived from the Central Bureau of Statistics. Regression analyses were performed to examine determinants of work and activity impairment. RESULTS: In total, 246 patients were included, of which 126 (51.2%) were female. Mean age (S.D.) was 55.7 (13.2) years. Compared with the Dutch general population, work for pay (WFP) was significantly lower in PsA (52.9% versus 62.6%, P < 0.001). In PsA, younger age and better physical function were associated with WFP status (P < 0.05). Higher disease activity, worse physical function, and worse mental health-related quality of life were associated with both more work and activity impairment (P < 0.05). Furthermore, reaching low disease activity status (LDA) according to Psoriatic ArthritiS Disease Activity Score (PASDAS; ≤ 3.2) was associated with less work and activity impairment than reaching LDA according to DAS28-CRP (≤ 2.9) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In PsA patients, worse physical function was associated with a lower likelihood of having WFP, and higher work and activity impairment. PASDAS LDA as a goal for treat to target, compared to DAS28-CRP, appears to favour the reduction of work and activity impairment.

Parents' experiences with a home-based upper limb training program using a video coaching approach for infants and toddlers with unilateral cerebral palsy: a qualitative interview study.

BACKGROUND: Although early home-based upper limb training programs are promising, in-depth understanding of parents' experiences with these programs is still limited. We developed an early home-based upper limb training program for infants and toddlers (8-36 months) with or at risk of unilateral cerebral palsy using video coaching for parents. The aim of this qualitative study was to evaluate parents' experiences with the home-based training program using a video coaching approach in order to optimize implementation strategies. METHODS: We held semi-structured interviews with parents of 13 children with unilateral cerebral palsy, who participated in our program in the period from 2014 - 2017. On average, parents had delivered two training periods of the program at the time of the interviews. Interviews were analyzed using inductive thematic content analysis. RESULTS: We identified three overarching interacting themes that shaped the experiences of parents with the program: 1) Parental learning comprising the subthemes parents' training competencies and the facilitative and reinforcing role of video coaching, 2) Parental load comprising the subthemes flexibility of the program, supportive network, competing demands, and child's mood and functional capacities, and 3) Parental perseverance comprising the subthemes beliefs and expectancies and seeing child's functional improvements. CONCLUSIONS: For successful implementation of an early home-based upper limb training program using video coaching, support in delivering home-training from a therapist or from others within parents' social network, is needed to relieve parental load. Seeing functional improvements of their child on the videos increased parents' motivation to continue with the training. Positively phrased feedback from an occupational therapist stimulated parents' perseverance and training competency.

Pain descriptors and determinants of pain sensitivity in knee osteoarthritis: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Objectives: The aim was to explore pain characteristics in individuals with knee OA (KOA), to compare pain sensitivity across individuals with KOA, individuals with chronic back pain (CBP) and pain-free individuals (NP) and to examine the relationship between clinical characteristics and pain sensitivity and between pain characteristics and pain sensitivity in KOA. Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional, community-based online survey. Two data sets were combined, consisting of Dutch individuals ≥40 years of age, who were experiencing chronic knee pain (KOA, n = 445), chronic back pain (CBP, n = 504) or no pain (NP, n = 256). Demographic and clinical characteristics, global health, physical activity/exercise and pain characteristics, including intensity, spreading, duration, quality (short-form McGill pain questionnaire) and sensitivity (pain sensitivity questionnaire), were assessed. Differences between (sub)groups were examined using analyses of variance or χ2 tests. Regression analyses were performed to examine determinants of pain sensitivity in the KOA group. Results: The quality of pain was most commonly described as aching, tender and tiring-exhausting. Overall, the KOA group had higher levels of pain sensitivity compared with the NP group, but lower levels than the CBP group. Univariately, pain intensity, its variability and spreading, global health, exercise and having co-morbidities were weakly related to pain sensitivity (standardized ß: 0.12-0.27). Symptom duration was not related to pain sensitivity. Older age, higher levels of continuous pain, lower levels of global health, and exercise contributed uniquely, albeit modestly, to pain sensitivity (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Continuous pain, such as aching and tenderness, in combination with decreased physical activity might be indicative for a subgroup of individuals at risk for pain sensitivity and, ultimately, poor treatment outcomes.

A Serious Puzzle Game to Enhance Adherence to Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Systematic Development Using Intervention Mapping.

BACKGROUND: Patients' implicit attitudes toward medication need and concerns may influence their adherence. Targeting these implicit attitudes by combining game-entertainment with medication-related triggers might improve medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the systematic development of a serious game to enhance adherence to antirheumatic drugs by using intervention mapping. METHODS: A serious game was developed using the intervention mapping framework guided by a multidisciplinary expert group, which proceeded along 6 steps: (1) exploring the problem by assessing the relationship between medication adherence and implicit attitudes, (2) defining change objectives, (3) selecting evidence-based behavior change techniques that focused on adjusting implicit attitudes, (4) designing the intervention, (5) guaranteeing implementation by focusing on intrinsic motivation, and (6) planning a scientific evaluation. RESULTS: Based on the problem assessment and guided by the Dual-Attitude Model, implicit negative and illness-related attitudes of patients with RA were defined as the main target for the intervention. Consequently, the change objective was "after the intervention, participants have a more positive attitude toward antirheumatic drugs." Attention bias modification, evaluative conditioning, and goal priming were the techniques chosen to implicitly target medication needs. These techniques were redesigned into medication-related triggers and built in the serious puzzle game. Thirty-seven patients with RA tested the game at several stages. Intrinsic motivation was led by the self-determination theory and addressed the 3 needs, that is, competence, autonomy, and relatedness. The intervention will be evaluated in a randomized clinical trial that assesses the effect of playing the serious game on antirheumatic drug adherence. CONCLUSIONS: We systematically developed a serious game app to enhance adherence to antirheumatic drugs among patients with RA by using the intervention mapping framework. This paper could serve as a guideline for other health care providers when developing similar interventions.

Defining the minimal important change (MIC) and meaningful change value (MCV) for the Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) in a routine practice cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the Minimal Important Change (MIC) values and Meaningful Change (MCV) values for the Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and the Standard Error of Measurement (s.e.m.) of the PASDAS. METHODS: The routine practice data for 544 patients with PsA was available for analysis. An anchor-based method using linear regression analyses was used to determine the MICs and MCVs for the PASDAS. With this anchor-based method, we compared changes in the PASDAS score with an external reference (anchor). The anchor question inquired whether the patient's well-being had changed since their previous visit. It consisted of a 7-point Likert scale (range: very much improved to very much deteriorated). Interperiod correlation matrix analysis was performed to determine the s.e.m. RESULTS: The overall MIC and MCV for the PASDAS were 0.67 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.79) and 1.34 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.46), respectively. Results for improvement and deterioration were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.83) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.93) for the MIC, respectively, and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.48) and 1.42 (95% CI: 1.19, 1.64) for the MCV, respectively. The s.e.m. was determined at 0.81. CONCLUSION: The MIC for the PASDAS is a tool for physicians treating patients with PsA enabling them to give context to the patient's perspective of disease activity, while the MCV might aid the use of the PASDAS in PsA clinical trials.

Being overweight is associated with not reaching low disease activity in women but not men with psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess sex differences in disease activity parameters and health-related quality of life in PsA, and to assess whether determinants associated with not reaching treatment target differed between men and women. METHODS: Routine practice data of 855 PsA patients, who were all tightly monitored and treated, was used. Sex differences including, but not limited to, PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), skin/nail disease, SF-12 PCS/MCS, and inflammatory back pain (IBP) were assessed. Multivariate analyses were used to examine determinants associated with not reaching treatment target (PASDAS ≤ 3.2) in men and women. RESULTS: Women had worse scores for-among others-swollen and tender joints, CRP, enthesitis and function (all P < 0.001). Higher PASDAS scores were found for women [3.5 (1.5)] than men [2.7 (1.5), P < 0.001]. Likewise, women were more often not at PASDAS treatment target (OR = 2.03, P < 0.001). No difference in current medication use was found. Nail disease, IBP, number of DMARDs used (past and current), and BMI were associated with not reaching treatment target in the overall sample. For women, but not men, BMI was associated with not reaching PASDAS low disease activity (LDA) (OR between 2.41 and 3.43, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women with PsA in a tightly monitored and treated setting have more severe disease than men. This is demonstrated by worse scores for women in both subjective and objective disease activity measures, in addition to women less often reaching the treatment target. Notably, being overweight is associated with higher disease activity in women, but not men.

Comparing methotrexate monotherapy with methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy in psoriatic arthritis (COMPLETE-PsA): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, trial.

BACKGROUND: Conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the preferred first-line treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis, although there is a paucity of evidence for the efficacy of conventional synthetic DMARDs and especially their combination. We aimed to investigate whether a combination of methotrexate plus leflunomide is superior to methotrexate monotherapy at improving disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis. METHODS: This single centre, investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at Sint Maartenskliniek in the Netherlands (locations included Boxmeer, Geldrop, Woerden, and Nijmegen). Patients aged 16 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis and active disease (defined as two or more swollen joints; dactylitis counting as one swollen joint) were included. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) and stratified by high disease activity (psoriatic arthritis disease activity score [PASDAS] ≥5·4) to either methotrexate plus leflunomide (combination therapy) or methotrexate plus placebo (monotherapy), using computer-generated stratified variable block randomisation. In both groups, patients received oral methotrexate 15 mg per week for the first 4 weeks and 25 mg per week thereafter combined with two leflunomide 10 mg tablets once per day or two placebo tablets. During the study period, the patients, nurses, researchers, and treating physicians were all masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the difference in mean PASDAS at week 16, adjusted for baseline PASDAS, between the combination and monotherapy groups, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NL7404) on Dec 3, 2018. FINDINGS: Between Feb 19, 2019, and March 11, 2021, 82 patients were screened for eligibility. Four patients were ineligible and 78 were enrolled and randomly assigned to either methotrexate plus leflunomide (n=39) or methotrexate plus placebo (n=39). 50 (64%) of 78 patients were male, 28 (36%) were female, and the median age of patients was 55·0 years (IQR 42·0-64·0). Methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy was superior to methotrexate monotherapy at week 16 (PASDAS 3·1 [SD 1·4] vs 3·7 [SD 1·3]; treatment difference -0·6, 90% CI -1·0 to -0·1; p=0·025). There were no study deaths. The most frequently occurring adverse events were nausea or vomiting (17 [44%] of 39 patients in the methotrexate plus leflunomide group vs 11 [28%] of 39 in the methotrexate plus placebo group), tiredness (9 [23%] vs 13 [33%]) and elevated alanine aminotransferase (12 [31%] vs 7 [18%]. Generally, the incidence of mostly mild adverse events was higher in the methotrexate plus leflunomide group than in the methotrexate plus placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy results in greater improvement in disease activity according to PASDAS in patients with psoriatic arthritis. However, methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy is less well tolerated than methotrexate monotherapy. FUNDING: Regional Junior Researcher Grant from the Sint Maartenskliniek.

Targeting self-efficacy more important than dysfunctional behavioral cognitions in patients with longstanding chronic low back pain; a longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary pain management programs based on cognitive behavioral training (CBT) principles have been shown moderately effective in improving daily functioning in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). To optimize health-related outcomes as daily functioning, a clear understanding of the working mechanisms of these programs is warranted. Being confident to achieve a desired outcome, i.e. self-efficacy, is suggested to be a more potent determinant for beneficial treatment outcomes than restructuring the patient's dysfunctional behavioral cognitions (pain catastrophizing and fear of movement [FoM]), but the evidence is scarce. The objective of this study was twofold: 1) to determine whether a two-week pain management program resulted in post-treatment improvements in self-efficacy and decreased dysfunctional behavioral cognitions in patients with CLBP, and 2) to examine the unique contribution of self-efficacy to improvement in post-treatment disability. METHODS: A secondary analysis of an historical cohort study was performed, including 524 patients (59% females). PRIMARY OUTCOME: functional status (Oswestry Disability Index v2.1a). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), FoM (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia), and self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire). ASSESSMENTS: pre-, post-treatment, 1, and 12-months follow-up. Paired Student's t-tests were applied and clinical relevancy of improvements was described using minimal clinical important changes. Adjusted multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to explore the unique contribution of self-efficacy. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 46 (SD = 9.5) years and they had longstanding CLBP (mean 12.5 [SD = 10.8] years). Mean functional status, self-efficacy, and dysfunctional behavioral cognitions improved significantly at post-treatment, with improvements maintained at 12 months follow-up. Post-treatment relevant improvements in self-efficacy and dysfunctional behavioral cognitions ranged from 62.4% (FoM) to 68.7% (self-efficacy). Post-treatment self-efficacy improved the model explaining post-treatment functional disability (basic model R2 = 0.49, F(6,517) = 83.67, p < 0.001; final model R2 = 0.57, F(8,515) = 85.20, p < 0.001). This was further substantiated by the relative contribution (standardized betas) of self-efficacy: 5.67 times more than catastrophizing and 9.75 times more than FoM. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting self-efficacy contributes to fast improvement in functional status for selected and motivated patients with persistent CLBP. In pain management programs and (online) self-management programs for CLBP, targeting patients' self-efficacy should have a prominent place.