Effects of Sprint Interval and Endurance Respiratory Muscle Training on Postcycling Inspiratory and Quadriceps Fatigue.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether a 4-wk period of respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET) or respiratory muscle sprint interval training (RMSIT) would lead to an attenuation of inspiratory muscle and quadriceps fatigue after a bout of high-intensity cycling compared with a placebo intervention (PLAT), as predicted by the respiratory metaboreflex model. METHODS: Thirty-three active, young healthy adults performed RMET, RMSIT, or PLAT. Changes in inspiratory muscle and quadriceps twitches in response to a cycling test at 90% of peak work capacity were assessed before and after training. EMG activity and deoxyhemoglobin (HHb, via near-infrared spectroscopy) of the quadriceps and inspiratory muscles were also monitored during the cycling test, along with cardiorespiratory and perceptual variables. RESULTS: At pretraining, cycling reduced the twitch force of the inspiratory muscles (86% ± 11% baseline) and quadriceps (66% ± 16% baseline). Training did not attenuate the drop in twitch force of the inspiratory muscles (PLAT, -3.5 ± 4.9 percent-points [p.p.]; RMET, 2.7 ± 11.3 p.p.; RMSIT, 4.1 ± 8.5 p.p.; group-training interaction, P = 0.394) or quadriceps (PLAT, 3.8 ± 18.6 p.p.; RMET, -2.6 ± 14.0 p.p.; RMSIT, 5.2 ± 9.8 p.p.; group-training interaction P = 0.432). EMG activity and HHb levels during cycling did not change after training for either group. Only RMSIT showed a within-group decrease in the perception of respiratory exertion with training. CONCLUSIONS: Four weeks of RMET or RMSIT did not attenuate the development of exercise-induced inspiratory or quadriceps fatigue. The ergogenic effects of respiratory muscle training during whole-body exercise might be related to an attenuation of perceptual responses.

Effects of Sprint-Interval and Endurance Respiratory Muscle Training Regimens.

INTRODUCTION: Recently a novel, time-saving respiratory muscle sprint-interval training (RMSIT) was developed. To test the extent to which RMSIT improves respiratory muscle performance compared with a conventional respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET), a novel incremental respiratory muscle test (IncRMT), loading inspiratory and expiratory muscles, was designed to assess performance changes associated with respiratory muscle training (RMT). METHODS: Healthy, moderately trained males and females (age: 26 ± 5 yr, V˙O2peak: 47 ± 12 mL·min·kg) were randomized and balanced to three groups (RMSIT 5m/5f; RMET 6m/6f; PLAT 5m/6f). Lung function, respiratory muscle strength, and IncRMT performance were tested before and after 1 month of RMT. During the IncRMT, muscle activity and muscle deoxygenation were assessed via surface EMG and near-infrared spectroscopy of sternocleidomastoid (STERNO), intercostal (INTER), and abdominal (ABDO) muscles. RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA revealed a main effect of training for increased maximal voluntary ventilation (P = 0.001) and maximal inspiratory pressure (P = 0.017). Both RMT groups increased work of breathing during training sessions to the same extent (RMSIT: +17.4 ± 8.9 kJ; RMET: +26.2 ± 16.1 kJ; P = 0.143) with a larger increase in average mouth pressure in RMSIT (RMSIT: +20.0 ± 15.0 cm H2O; RMET: +3.3 ± 1.5 cm H2O; P = 0.001). After training, IncRMT duration increased in both RMT groups compared with PLAT (RMSIT: +5.6 ± 2.1 min, P = 0.0006 vs PLAT; RMET: +3.8 ± 4.2 min, P = 0.020 vs PLAT). At similar work, only INTER activity during inspiration increased after RMET. Higher performance after RMSIT was associated with higher activity in STERNO and ABDO, but after RMET, STERNO, INTER, and ABDO showed higher activity. CONCLUSION: One month of RMSIT and RMET shows similar improvements in respiratory muscle performance despite different duration of training sessions. Also, muscular adaptations might differ.

Acute Effects of a Respiratory Sprint-Interval Session on Muscle Contractility.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory muscle training has been shown to improve physical performance in healthy individuals and patients. One training modality for both inspiratory and expiratory muscles is respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET), which consists of normocapnic hyperpnea at constant ventilation for 30 min. Here, a new training regimen, respiratory muscle sprint-interval training (RMSIT), is introduced and tested for its potential to fatigue respiratory muscles. In addition, effects of both modalities on airway properties are investigated. METHODS: In 12 healthy subjects (six men and six women; 24 ± 3 yr; forced expiratory volume in 1 s, 115% ± 10%), changes in inspiratory transdiaphragmatic twitch pressure (Pdi,tw) and expiratory gastric twitch pressure (Pga,tw) were assessed during cervical magnetic stimulation or thoracic magnetic stimulation before and after a single bout of RMET and RMSIT. At similar time points, mechanical airway properties were assessed by impulse oscillometry. RMET was performed for 30 min at 60% of maximal voluntary ventilation, with constant tidal volume and breathing frequency. RMSIT consisted of six 30-s respiratory sprints (with 2-min breaks in between) at constant tidal volume, with the greatest possible breathing frequency and added resistance. RESULTS: Pdi,tw and Pga,tw decreased significantly after RMET (-17.7% ± 9.0% and -22.4% ± 18.5%; P < 0.01) and RMSIT (-18.1% ± 12.8% and -21.2% ± 13.1%; P < 0.01), and changes did not differ between training modalities (P = 0.50 and P = 0.12), suggesting similar levels of fatigue. Work of breathing per minute was 2.4 ± 0.8-fold greater in RMSIT than in RMET, whereas total work of breathing was substantially smaller in RMSIT (3.4 ± 0.8 kJ) than in RMET (15.0 ± 0.42 kJ). No subject showed clinically relevant changes in mechanical airway properties. CONCLUSIONS: Despite different work history, RMSIT appears to place a metabolic load on respiratory muscles similarly to RMET and could therefore be considered a time-saving and safe training alternative.

Aspects of respiratory muscle fatigue in a mountain ultramarathon race.

PURPOSE: Ultramarathon running offers a unique possibility to investigate the mechanisms contributing to the limitation of endurance performance. Investigations of locomotor muscle fatigue show that central fatigue is a major contributor to the loss of strength in the lower limbs after an ultramarathon. In addition, respiratory muscle fatigue is known to limit exercise performance, but only limited data are available on changes in respiratory muscle function after ultramarathon running and it is not known whether the observed impairment is caused by peripheral and/or central fatigue. METHODS: In 22 experienced ultra-trail runners, we assessed respiratory muscle strength, i.e., maximal voluntary inspiratory and expiratory pressures, mouth twitch pressure (n = 16), and voluntary activation (n = 16) using cervical magnetic stimulation, lung function, and maximal voluntary ventilation before and after a 110-km mountain ultramarathon with 5862 m of positive elevation gain. RESULTS: Both maximal voluntary inspiratory (-16% ± 13%) and expiratory pressures (-21% ± 14%) were significantly reduced after the race. Fatigue of inspiratory muscles likely resulted from substantial peripheral fatigue (reduction in mouth twitch pressure, -19% ± 15%; P < 0.01), as voluntary activation (-3% ± 6%, P = 0.09) only tended to be decreased, suggesting negligible or only mild levels of central fatigue. Forced vital capacity remained unchanged, whereas forced expiratory volume in 1 s, peak inspiratory and expiratory flow rates, and maximal voluntary ventilation were significantly reduced (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ultraendurance running reduces respiratory muscle strength for inspiratory muscles shown to result from significant peripheral muscle fatigue with only little contribution of central fatigue. This is in contrast to findings in locomotor muscles. Whether this difference between muscle groups results from inherent neuromuscular differences, their specific pattern of loading or other reasons remain to be clarified.

Locomotor and diaphragm muscle fatigue in endurance athletes performing time-trials of different durations.

PURPOSE: Fatigue in leg muscles might differ between running and cycling due to inherent differences in muscle activation patterns. Moreover, postural demand placed upon the diaphragm during running could augment the development of diaphragm fatigue. METHODS: We investigated quadriceps and diaphragm fatigue in 11 runners and 11 cyclists (age: 29 ± 5 years; [Formula: see text]O2,peak: 66.9 ± 5.5 ml min(-1) kg(-1)) by assessing quadriceps twitch force (Q tw) and transdiaphragmatic twitch pressure (P di,tw) before and after 15- and 30-min time-trials (15TT, 30TT). Inspiratory muscle fatigue was also obtained after volitional normocapnic hyperpnoea (NH) where postural demand is negligible. We hypothesized that running and cycling would induce different patterns of fatigue and that runners would develop less respiratory muscle fatigue when performing NH. RESULTS: The reduction in Q tw was greater in cyclists (32 ± 6 %) compared to runners (13 ± 8 %, p < 0.01), but not different for 15TTs (23 ± 13 %) and 30TTs (21 ± 11 %, p = 0.34). Overall P di,tw was more reduced after 15TTs (24 ± 8 %) than after 30TTs (20 ± 9 %, p = 0.04) while being similar for runners and cyclists (p = 0.78). Meanwhile, breathing duration in NH and the magnitude of inspiratory muscle fatigue were also not different (both p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Different levels of leg muscle fatigue in runners and cyclists could in part be related to the specific muscle activation patterns including concentric contractions in both modalities but eccentric contractions in runners only. Diaphragm fatigue likely resulted from the large ventilatory load which is characteristic for both exercise modalities and which was higher in 15TTs than in 30TTs (+27 %, p < 0.01) while postural demand appears to be of less importance.

Effect of inspiratory muscle fatigue on exercise performance taking into account the fatigue-induced excess respiratory drive.

Inspiratory muscle fatigue (IMF) is suggested to compromise exercise performance, possibly via a respiratory muscle metaboreflex that impairs blood flow to working muscles, thereby accelerating the development of fatigue in these muscles. Cycling with IMF has also been associated with an excess ventilatory response, which could per se impair performance. Therefore, the present study investigated whether prior-induced IMF would affect subsequent cycling performance via increased quadriceps muscle fatigue alone and whether fatigue-induced excess ventilation would contribute to this impairment. Fourteen healthy male subjects (peak oxygen uptake, 57.0 ± 5.5 ml min(-1) kg(-1)) cycled to exhaustion at 85% of their maximal work output with prior-induced IMF (PF-EX) and without prior-induced IMF (C-EX). Subjects then cycled twice for the duration of PF-EX but without prior IMF, once with spontaneous breathing (C-ISO) and once with breathing coached to match PF-EX ventilation (MATCH-ISO). Inspiratory muscle (P(tw)) and quadriceps muscle contractility (Q(tw)) was assessed via magnetic nerve stimulation before and after exercise. The time to exhaustion in the PF-EX conditions was significantly reduced by 14% compared with C-EX. The reduction in P(tw) and Q(tw) was greater after PF-EX (P(tw), 17.3 ± 9.7%; Q(tw), 32.0 ± 10.8%) than after MATCH-ISO (P(tw), 10.8 ± 10.3%; Q(tw), 23.3 ± 15.2%; P < 0.05), which may explain the increased perception of exertion and earlier task failure with prior-induced IMF. The augmented ventilatory drive had no effect on reductions in P(tw) and Q(tw) after MATCH-ISO compared with C-ISO. Thus, prior-induced IMF reduces exercise performance, probably as a result of the increased quadriceps muscle fatigue and thus greater perception of exertion independent of the excess respiratory drive when cycling with fatigued inspiratory muscles.