Optimal Medical Management of Atherosclerotic Intracranial Stenosis.

Reducing the high risk of recurrent stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) has proven to be challenging, but aggressive medical management, with intensive risk factor control and antithrombotic therapy, has been shown to be beneficial. High-intensity statins are recommended for patients with atherosclerotic stroke, including sICAS. Ezetimibe and PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitors are beneficial for those who fail to reach low-density lipoprotein targets or those with statin intolerance. The treatment target for sICAS is low-density lipoprotein <70 mg/dL. In neurologically stable patients, blood pressure should be treated to goal <140/90 mm Hg with the use of thiazide diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin II receptor blockers preferentially. For those with diabetes, treat to goal hemoglobin A1C ≤7% for most patients through combination of diet, insulin, and hypoglycemic drugs. Some degree of physical activity (eg, walking, stationary biking with arms or legs, etc) should be encouraged in all patients with sICAS who are not severely disabled. A minimum of 10 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity 4 times a week is recommended for patients who are capable of exercise. For all patients with severe sICAS (70%-99% stenosis), dual antiplatelet therapy for up to 90 days followed by single antiplatelet agent is recommended.

Program to Avoid Cerebrovascular Events through Systematic Electronic Tracking and Tailoring of an Eminent Risk factor: Protocol of a RCT.

BACKGROUND: Geographical and racial disparities in stroke outcomes are especially prominent in the Southeastern United States, which represents a region more heavily burdened with stroke compared to the rest of the country. While stroke is eminently preventable, particularly via blood pressure control, fewer than one third of patients with a stroke have their blood pressure controlled ≥ 75% of the time, and low consistency of blood pressure control is linked to higher stroke risk. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that a mHealth technology-centered, integrated approach can effectively improve sustained blood pressure control among stroke patients (half of whom will be Black). DESIGN: The Program to Avoid Cerebrovascular Events through Systematic Electronic Tracking and Tailoring of an Eminent Risk-factor is a prospective randomized controlled trial, which will include a cohort of 200 patients with a stroke, encountered at two major safety net health care systems in South Carolina. The intervention comprises utilization of a Vaica electronic pill tray & blue-toothed UA-767Plus BT blood pressure device and a dedicated app installed on patients' smart phones for automatic relay of data to a central server. Providers will follow care protocols based on expert consensus practice guidelines to address optimal blood pressure management. STUDY OUTCOMES: Primary outcome is systolic blood pressure at 12-months, which is the major modifiable step to stroke event rate reduction. Secondary endpoints include control of other stroke risk factors, medication adherence, functional status, and quality of life. DISCUSSION: We anticipate that a successful intervention will serve as a scalable model of effective chronic blood pressure management after stroke, to bridge racial and geographic disparities in stroke outcomes in the United States. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT03401489.

Secondary Stroke Prevention and Management for the Neuro-Ophthalmologist.

BACKGROUND: This article will serve as a comprehensive review of secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and central and branch retinal artery ischemia, which are closely linked pathologically and can be managed similarly to prevent further reoccurrence. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a search in PubMed with a focus on reports involving secondary stroke prevention. RESULTS: This review discusses the etiologies of stroke and addresses the evidence for optimal therapies for secondary stroke prevention. We review recent clinical trials that will serve as an aid to the neuro-ophthalmologist in practice to determine the best next step in management and when to consider further referral to a stroke specialist. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal treatment to prevent stroke recurrence is determined by the etiology of stroke. After stroke workup, patients will typically be placed on proper medical therapy for the appropriate duration in addition to counseling on lifestyle modifications to reduce the risk of recurrent strokes. For complex patients, it is reasonable for providers to consider patient referral to stroke specialists for further aid in selection of appropriate medical therapy.

Hemodynamic Markers in the Anterior Circulation as Predictors of Recurrent Stroke in Patients With Intracranial Stenosis.

Background and Purpose- Although aggressive medical therapy was superior to stenting in the SAMMPRIS trial (Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis), the stroke rate in the medical arm was still high. The aim of this study was to determine the association between hemodynamic markers (borderzone infarct pattern and impaired collateral flow on baseline imaging) and rates of recurrent stroke in patients treated medically in SAMMPRIS. Methods- This was a post hoc analysis of patients whose qualifying event for SAMMPRIS was an infarct in the territory of a stenotic middle cerebral artery or intracranial carotid artery. Infarcts were adjudicated as involving primarily internal or cortical borderzone territories, the core middle cerebral artery territory, or perforator territories, and collateral flow was assessed according to a standard scale (American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology). Log-rank tests and χ2 tests were performed to assess associations of infarct patterns and collateral flow with rates of recurrent stroke. Results- Of 101 patients who qualified, 14 of 53 (26.4%) with borderzone infarcts, 2 of 24 (8.3%) with core middle cerebral artery infarcts, and 3 of 24 (12.5%) with perforator infarcts had a recurrent stroke in the territory (P=0.14 for comparing the 3 groups, P=0.052 for borderzone versus nonborderzone). Of 82 patients with collateral flow assessment, 30 of 43 (70%) with borderzone infarcts, 7 of 19 (37%) with core middle cerebral artery infarcts, and 11 of 20 (55%) with perforator infarcts had impaired collateral flow distal to the stenosis (P=0.049). Patients with borderzone infarcts and impaired collateral flow had the highest risk of recurrent stroke (37%). Conclusions- Borderzone infarcts and impaired collateral flow identify a subgroup of patients with intracranial stenosis who are at particularly high risk of recurrent stroke on medical treatment. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00576693.

Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Surgery, Stenting, or Medical Therapy?

OPINION STATEMENT: Symptomatic carotid artery disease is a significant cause of ischemic stroke, and these patients are at high risk for recurrent vascular events. Patients with symptoms of stroke or transient ischemic attack attributable to a significantly stenotic vessel (70-99% luminal narrowing) should be treated with intensive medical therapy. Intensive medical therapy is a combination of pharmacologic and lifestyle interventions consistent with best-known practices as follows: initiation of antiplatelet agent or anticoagulation if medically indicated, high potency statin medication, blood pressure control with goal blood pressure of greater than 140/90, Mediterranean-style diet, exercise, and smoking cessation. Further, patients who have extracranial culprit lesions should be considered for revascularization with either carotid endarterectomy or carotid angioplasty and stenting depending on several factors including the patient's anatomy, age, gender, and procedural risk. Based on current evidence, patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis should be managed with intensive medical therapy, including the use of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for the first 90 days following the ischemic event. While the literature has shown a stronger benefit of revascularization of extracranial symptomatic disease among certain subgroups of patients with greater than 70% stenosis, there is less benefit from revascularization with endarterectomy in patients with moderate stenosis of 50-69% if the surgeon's risk of perioperative stroke or death rate is greater than 6%.

Angioplasty and Stenting.

The high rate of recurrent strokes in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAS) despite medical therapy prompted intracranial angioplasty and/or stenting an adjunctive treatment option. The minute calibers of cerebral arteries, the relative paucity of supporting medial and adventitia layers, the presence of end-anastomosing perforator branches, and the vascular tortuosity from groin to head all demand specialized operative skills and dedicated tools. Since the stroke mechanism of ICAS is diverse, patient selection for endovascular treatment requires a sound understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. Patients with territorial cerebral hypo-perfusion associated with a high-grade steno-occlusive lesion may benefit most from endovascular revascularization. On the other hand, patients with atheromatous branch disease may stand a higher risk of perforator stroke from 'snow plowing' effect if angioplasty or stenting is inadvertently performed. A joint evaluation on the indication, procedural risks and benefits, and an individualized peri-operative care plan by a stroke neurologist and a neuro-interventionist is crucial prior to a procedure. Currently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Wingspan for patients who have developed two or more strokes despite aggressive medical management. The treatment indication will likely evolve in parallel with the advancement of endovascular techniques and our understanding of ICAS.