Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: is one superior?

BACKGROUND: As endovascular treatment of asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) increasingly competes with surgical repair, it is necessary to optimize the surgical technique. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the superiority of either retroperitoneal (RP) or transperitoneal (TP) approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Intra- and peri-operative data from 80 patients with infrarenal AAA and tube graft repair were analysed retrospectively. The RP-approach was used in 37 patients and in 43 the transperitoneal. RESULTS: There was no relevant difference in demographic data and anaesthetic regime; exceptions were differences between the two groups in terms of age (median RP 72.31 vs. TP 68.58 years, p = 0.0174), hypertension (RP 26/37 vs. TP 40/43, p = 0.0019), smoking (RP 25/37 vs. TP 38/43, p = 0.0462), pulmonary diseases (RP 15/37 vs. TP 7/43, p = 0.0232), and previous abdominal surgery (RP 3/37 vs. TP 12/43, p = 0.042). No patient died during the first 30 post-operative days. The RP-group had a longer cross-clamping time (median RP 50 vs. TP 45 min, p = 0.0115) but no difference was found in operating time. Intra-operative blood loss was higher in the RP-group (median RP 800 vs. TP 500 ml, p = 0.033) with an increased need for blood substitutes (median RP 1 vs. TP 0 packed red cells, p = 0.0068). Time spent in ICU was shorter (median RP 24 vs. TP 46 hours, p = 0.0104), but duration of hospitalisation was longer for the RP-group (median RP 13 vs. TP 10.5 days, p = 0.0156). No differences were found in the need for analgesics, the frequency of procedure related complications, and post-operative recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair of AAA in selected patients by tube graft placement is a safe procedure independent of the approach. In particular, our findings do not support previously reported superiority of the RP-approach.

[Impaired cerebral autoregulation in asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis: comparison of acetazolamide-SPECT and transcranial CO(2)-dopplersonography]. / Störung der zerebralen Perfusionsreserve.

PURPOSE: The indication for operation in patients with asymptomatic high-grade carotid artery stenosis is still under debate. Since impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation is associated with an increased risk for ischaemic events, assessment of cerebral vascular reactivity might be a valuable selection criterion for surgery. The aim of our study was therefore to evaluate the incidence of impaired autoregulation in asymptomatic patients with acetazolamide-single photon emission computed tomography (ACZ-SPECT) and transcranial CO (2)-dopplersonography (CO (2)-TCD). Furthermore, both methods were compared in regard to results and clinical practicability. METHODS: In 42 patients with high-grade (> 70 %) asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, cerebral perfusion and vascular reactivity were assessed with resting and ACZ-enhanced SPECT scans. In 31 of these patients the CO (2) reactivity of cerebral perfusion was determined by TCD and expressed as normalized autoregulation reserve (NAR). RESULTS: Cerebral perfusion was decreased in 14.3 %. In ACZ-SPECT 26 % and in CO (2)-TCD 28 % revealed an impaired vascular reactivity. Conformity of both methods was high (kappa = 0.93). TCD was superior in practicability, but only applicable in 81 % due to a missing temporal bone window for insonation. CONCLUSION: In accordance ACZ-SPECT and CO (2)-TCD could detect impaired vascular reactivity in a quarter of asymptomatic patients. Both TCD and SPECT could be of value for preoperative selection in this group of patients, whereby sonography is recommended for daily diagnostic work-up.

Early carotid endarterectomy in patients with a nondisabling ischemic stroke: results of a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are several recent recommendations not to delay carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for at least 4 weeks in patients experiencing a nondisabling ischemic stroke. Therefore, we re-examined if these patients could be safely operated on earlier: The aim of our study was to review the perioperative stroke and death rates of CEA performed within 30 days of stroke onset. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 4 year period until December 2001, in 66 neurologically stable patients suffering a nondisabling stroke ipsilateral to a carotid artery stenosis > 50% CEA was performed after a median interval of 10 (1-28) days. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) was applied to characterize the severity of impairment of daily living activities pre- and postoperatively: Any postoperative deterioration > 24 hours on the mRS was considered as a new stroke. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 0%, and postoperative neurologic worsening > 24 hours occurred in 8/66 patients (12.1%). In 5/8 patients neurologic deterioration resolved within 5 days after surgery, only one stroke was permanent (1.5%). There was no correlation between timing of surgery or the presence of acute ipsilateral cranial CT defects with the occurrence of postoperative stroke. Stroke severity grading on admission according to the mRS, however, emerged to be a significant determinant of postoperative outcome: While 6/23 patients (26%) with an initial deficit > or = 3 on the mRS developed neurologic worsening, this was the case in only 2/43 patients (4.6%) with a deficit < or = 2 (Odds Ratio 7.2; 95% CI 1.32-39.49; two-sided p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that selected patients with a minor stroke (mRS < or = 2 on admission) can safely undergo early CEA.