RESUMO
Background: The field of hereditary cancer syndromes and genetic testing for patients and families is a rapidly evolving discipline, with an emphasis on cancer prevention. Methods: We review the literature regarding the most common genetic syndromes associated with gynecologic malignancies and discuss the management of these conditions. We also examine the logistic process surrounding cancer genetic testing and identify some perceived barriers. Results: Five genetic syndromes are known to be associated with gynecologic malignancies: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch, Cowden, Peutz-Jeghers, and Li-Fraumeni. Each is associated with varying risks of breast, ovarian, and uterine malignancies. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines regarding the management of these syndromes are focused primarily on reducing the risk of developing gynecologic malignancies. However, great complexity is involved with genetic testing for patients and their families, and barriers exist for the widespread use and implementation of such testing. Conclusion: Genetic testing is fundamental to primary cancer prevention and to oncologic care. Physicians, payers, and institutions must work collaboratively to maximize genetic testing with the goals of primary cancer prevention and treatment.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Age imposes a disparity in the treatment of and outcomes with gynecologic cancer. Older patients are underrepresented in primary treatment trials, but little is known about their ability to withstand trial-based treatment for recurrent or refractory disease. This study sought to examine treatment-related toxicities and outcomes of older versus younger patients participating in phase 1 clinical trials. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in phase 1 clinical trials for gynecologic malignancies from 2010 to 2016 was performed. Demographic and clinic-pathologic data was abstracted. Toxicities were defined as either grade III or IV by CTCAE criteria. Best response was calculated using RECIST criteria. Associations between categorical variables were determined using Fisher's exact test and continuous variables using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: 237 patients were included with 22% (n=51) comprising the older cohort (≥70years). The vast majority (98%) were treated for recurrent disease. Older patients incurred similar grade III/IV hematologic (21% vs 16%, p=0.38) and non-hematologic toxicities (26% vs 29%, p=0.64). Older patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity only 8% of the time. Median survival was 13.0 and 10.3months in the <70 and ≥70 groups, respectively (p=0.35). 63% of patients ≥70 achieved clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Although historically older patients have not been routinely considered for enrollment in phase 1 trials, our data demonstrates similar toxicity profiles to that of younger patients and 63% clinical benefit rate. Thus, with careful selection, patients ≥70 should be considered when facing recurrent or refractory gynecologic cancer.
