Real-world Data of Palliative First-line Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy is now approved in PD-L1-positive patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Since real-world data are pending, our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy in an unselected cohort of patients with SCCHN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 78 patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN from three Austrian cancer centers that received CPI therapy alone or with chemotherapy as palliative first-line systemic treatment for this retrospective study. Patient characteristics, details on treatment, and survival were analyzed by a chart-based review. RESULTS: Of the 78 patients analyzed, 55 patients were treated with CPI alone (45 with Pembrolizumab, 10 with Nivolumab) and 23 patients received chemotherapy with a platinum and 5-FU in addition to CPI. With a median follow-up of twelve months, the median PFS of all patients was 4 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=2.2-5.8] and the median OS was 11 months (95% CI=7.1-14.9). The overall response and disease control rates were 20.5% and 46.1%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcome between patient groups with a different combined positive score (CPS). The rate of reported immune related adverse events was comparable to existing data. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm the results of the KEYNOTE-048 trial that CPI therapy alone or together with chemotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic CPS-positive SCCHN.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin is superior to radioimmunotherapy with cetuximab and radiotherapy alone : Analysis of the Austrian head and neck cancer registry of the AGMT.

BACKGROUND: The addition of cisplatin or cetuximab to radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has significantly improved the outcome. While the superiority of cisplatin over cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy has been shown in a definitive setting, we set out to compare postoperative chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin to radioimmunotherapy with cetuximab and radiotherapy alone within the Austrian head and neck cancer registry of the Working Group on Pharmaceutical Tumor Treatment (AGMT) study group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the AGMT head and neck cancer registry, data of 557 patients with SCCHN from five Austrian cancer centers were prospectively collected between 2012 and 2017. Of these patients 120 received postoperative chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin, 26 patients received postoperative radioimmunotherapy with cetuximab and 56 patients were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy only. Patient characteristics, stage of disease, details on treatment as well as survival were analyzed by a chart-based review. RESULTS: In patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy the addition of cisplatin significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to cetuximab (PFS 84.2 months vs. 17.0 months, p = 0.04, OS not reached vs. 46.0 months, p = 0.02) and PFS compared to radiotherapy alone (PFS 84.2 months vs. 28.5 months, p < 0.01). Patients treated with cetuximab were significantly older and had a worse performance score than patients receiving cisplatin or radiotherapy alone. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the importance of multimodal treatment concepts in patients with locally advanced SCCHN. Postoperative cetuximab might be an option in patients not eligible for high-dose cisplatin but cisplatin should remain the standard of care.

Treatment with brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine in unselected patients with CD30-positive aggressive lymphomas.

OBJECTIVES: A treatment regimen consisting of bendamustine and brentuximab vedotin (BV) has been described as a highly potent salvage therapy and as an effective induction therapy leading to high response rates before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). In this retrospective analysis, we aimed to assess this therapy's efficacy in unselected patients with cHL and CD30+ peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 28 patients with cHL and five patients with PTCL treated with a combination of bendamustine and BV at three Austrian tertiary cancer centers were analyzed. RESULTS: In patients with cHL, the ORR was 100% (78.6% CR, 21.4% PR). After 17 months median follow-up, median survival times were not reached; 1-year PFS was 81.9%, and 1-year OS was 95.7%. Thirteen eligible patients (46.4%) successfully underwent planned ASCT after salvage therapy with bendamustine and BV and subsequent high-dose chemotherapy. Three of the five PTCL patients achieved CR, while two did not respond and died during or shortly after therapy. CONCLUSION: A combination of bendamustine and BV is an effective salvage and induction therapy before ASCT in patients with relapsed/refractory cHL. Further research is warranted to evaluate the use in patients with PTCL.