Efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy in the posterior cerebral circulation-a single center study.

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the current standard treatment for strokes in the anterior cerebral circulation (AMT) and has recently been proven to be beneficial in the posterior circulation strokes (PMT). Our study aims to evaluate parameters for favorable outcomes in PMT-patients and to compare the clinical characteristics of individuals who received AMT and PMT. For this purpose, we confronted AMT and PMT-receipients and performed a multivariate regression analysis to assess the influence of factors on favorable outcomes in the study group and in the AMT and PMT subgroups. When analysing 623 MT-patients, those who received PMT had significantly lower admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (9 vs. 13; p < 0.001) and 24 h post-MT (7 vs. 12; p = 0.006). Key parameters influencing the favorable outcomes of PMT at discharge and at 90th day include: NIHSS scores (OR: 0.865, 95% CI: 0.813-0.893, and OR: 0.900, 95% CI: 0.861-0.925), MT time (OR: 0.993, 95% CI: 0.987-0.998 and OR: 0.993, 95% CI: 0.990-0.997), and leukocytosis (OR: 0.961, 95% CI: 0.928-0.988 and OR: 0.974, 95% CI: 0.957-0.998). Different clinical profiles exist between AMT and PMT-recipients, with the neurological status post-MT being decisive for the prognosis. Several factors play an important role in predicting outcome, especially in the PMT group.

Long-term cenobamate retention, efficacy, and safety: outcomes from Expanded Access Programme.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the long-term retention rate, efficacy, and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate (CNB) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy within the Polish Expanded Access Programme (EAP). CLINICAL RATIONALE FOR THE STUDY: Long-term retention rate is a useful measure of effectiveness including efficacy, safety, and tolerability of antiseizure medications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with focal epilepsy treated with CNB in the EAP between January 2020 and May 2023. All patients who completed the open-label extension phases of the YKP3089C013 and YKP3089C017 trials were offered the opportunity to continue CNB treatment within the EAP. We analysed cenobamate retention, seizure outcomes, and adverse events. RESULTS: 38 patients (18 females; 47.3%) continued CNB treatment within the Expanded Access Programme for 41 months. The mean baseline age of patients was 39.3 years (range: 18-57). All patients were on polytherapy, with the most commonly used antiseizure medications being valproate, levetiracetam, and carbamazepine. Adjunctive CNB treatment resulted in a reduced mean seizure frequency from 8.1 seizures (range: 4-20) per month to 3 seizures (range: 0-8) per month. At the final follow-up, the median CNB dose was 200 mg/day (range: 50-350). Among the patients, 24 (63.1%) achieved ≥ 50% seizure reduction, and eight (21%) remained seizure-free for at least 12 months. One in three patients experienced adverse events, which resolved in half of the subjects. The most frequent adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, and headache. The retention rate after completing the open-label extension phase was 100%. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Long-term effectiveness, including ≥ 50% seizure reduction and a 100% retention rate, was sustained over 41 months of CNB treatment within the Expanded Access Programme. No new safety issues were identified. These results provide support for the potential long-term clinical benefits of cenobamate.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Selected Neurological Diseases-One Centre's Experience Based on the Therapy of 141 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are the first-choice drugs for the treatment of certain neuroimmune diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVIg in patients with selected nervous system diseases. METHODS: The study enrolled patients who received IVIg in programmes financed by the National Health Fund in Poland. The status of patients upon inclusion and during treatment was assessed using scales dedicated to specific neurological diseases. RESULTS: The study enrolled 141 patients aged 56.28 ± 14.72 (51.77% female): 21 patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), 65 with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), 30 with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), 12 with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and 13 patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Neurological improvement was found in 14 (66.66%) MG patients (with a reduction of at least three points on the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMGS) within 14 days from the completion of the cycle), and in 34 (52.3%) GBS patients (with a reduction of at least one point on the Medical Research Council Scale within 14 days from the completion of the cycle). The parameters with the strongest effect on clinical improvement in MG patients were age [OR 1.033, CI 95% [0.09-1.09], p = 0.049] and baseline QMGS [OR 0.505; CI 95% [0.24-0.87], p = 0.038]. In the majority of CIDP patients (27, 97%) and NMOSD patients (6, 50%), neurological stabilisation was observed (without clinical improvement, defined for CIDP patients as an increase of at least two points on the Lovett Scale after three courses of IVIg were administered, and for NMOSD patients as an increase of at least one point on the Medical Research Council Scale and/or a shift of at least 0.3 logMAR after three courses of treatment). Deep-vein thrombosis was only one serious adverse event in the total group of patients treated with IVIg. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IVIg in patients with MG and GBS mostly results in neurological improvement, while in patients with NMOSD and CIDP, it mostly results in disease stabilisation. This could indicate the predominant anti-idiotypic antibody activity of IVIg in acute neuroimmune diseases or during exacerbations in chronic autoimmune diseases. The therapy of AE in comorbid neoplastic disease is burdened with an elevated risk of failure for IVIg. The results of our study confirm the improved safety of IVIg for selected neurological diseases.