Executive function improvement in response to meta-cognitive training in chronic mTBI / PTSD.

Objective: We tested Goal Management Training (GMT), which has been recommended as an executive training protocol that may improve the deficits in the complex tasks inherent in life role participation experienced by those with chronic mild traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disease (mTBI/PTSD). We assessed, not only cognitive function, but also life role participation (quality of life). Methods: We enrolled and treated 14 individuals and administered 10 GMT sessions in-person and provided the use of the Veterans Task Manager (VTM), a Smartphone App, which was designed to serve as a "practice-buddy" device to ensure translation of in-person learning to independent home and community practice of complex tasks. Pre-/post-treatment primary measure was the NIH Examiner, Unstructured Task. Secondary measures were as follows: Tower of London time to complete (cTOL), Community Reintegration of Service Members (CRIS) three subdomains [Extent of Participation; Limitations; Satisfaction of Life Role Participation (Satisfaction)]. We analyzed pre-post-treatment, t-test models to explore change, and generated descriptive statistics to inspect given individual patterns of change across measures. Results: There was statistically significant improvement for the NIH EXAMINER Unstructured Task (p < .02; effect size = .67) and cTOL (p < .01; effect size = .52. There was a statistically significant improvement for two CRIS subdomains: Extent of Participation (p < .01; effect size = .75; Limitations (p < .05; effect size = .59). Individuals varied in their treatment response, across measures. Conclusions and Clinical Significance: In Veterans with mTBI/PTSD in response to GMT and the VTM learning support buddy, there was significant improvement in executive cognition processes, sufficiently robust to produce significant improvement in community life role participation. The individual variations support need for precision neurorehabilitation. The positive results occurred in response to treatment advantages afforded by the content of the combined GMT and the employment of the VTM learning support buddy, with advantages including the following: manualized content of the GMT; incremental complex task difficulty; GMT structure and flexibility to incorporate individualized functional goals; and the VTM capability of ensuring translation of in-person instruction to home and community practice, solidifying newly learned executive cognitive processes. Study results support future study, including a potential randomized controlled trial, the manualized GMT and availability of the VTM to ensure future clinical deployment of treatment, as warranted.

Smartphone Application for Measuring Community Participation in Veterans With Traumatic Brain Injury.

The goal in the rehabilitation of veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is to improve community participation. A tool that can objectively measure community participation is lacking. The aims of this study are to evaluate the feasibility of a smartphone application (app) called MOVES to objectively measure community participation; and compare MOVES with a self-report questionnaire, and differences between veterans with mTBI and civilians without TBI. It is a 6-week parallel observational study, which included seven veterans with blast-related mTBI and five civilians without TBI. The measures include MOVES, Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (self-report participation measure), Satisfaction Questionnaire, and Perceived Accuracy Daily Logs. Participants were mostly satisfied using the MOVES app with 75% retention rate. Perceived accuracy of the MOVES app was 90%, while the two groups showed similar discrepancies between the PART-O and the MOVES (52% vs. 53%). The MOVES app is a feasible option to objectively measure community participation. Self-report was discrepant from the MOVES app for both groups.

Measurement Properties of the MPAI-4 in Veterans With mTBI.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the measurement properties of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory Version 4 (MPAI-4) and its participation index (M2PI), which have been adopted as 2 outcome measures in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Polytrauma Rehabilitation Systems of Care, are adequate in veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Postdeployment veterans with blast-related mTBI (N=177). INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory Version 4 (MPAI-4) and Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ). RESULTS: The unidimensional factor structure of the MPAI-4 total and 3 index scores (abilities, adjustment, participation) were confirmed. Eight of the 30 items were removed for violating monotonicity (6 items) and exceeding Rasch infit (2 items). The rating scale was collapsed from 5 to 3 ratings because of structure issues. The remaining 22 MPAI-4 items demonstrated excellent item/person reliability (0.98/0.91) and separated person ability into 4 strata. Two of the MPAI-4 index scores (abilities and adjustment) had good measurement properties. The third index, M2PI, retained only 3 items that had adequate person reliability (0.75) but separated person ability into only 2 strata. A significant but fair association with the CIQ was demonstrated with the modified MPAI-4. CONCLUSIONS: The MPAI-4 has been validated in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury but required modification when used in active military personnel with mTBI. We also identified the need for modification of the MPAI-4 to support adequate psychometrics when measuring outcomes in veterans with mTBI. Additional validation of the M2PI is needed in veterans and active military personnel with mTBI, to determine whether the M2PI should continue to be used as an outcome measure in the VHA polytrauma rehabilitation systems.

An Investigation of Exposure Control Methods With Variable-Length CAT Using the Partial Credit Model.

The purpose of this simulation study was to investigate the effect of several different item exposure control procedures in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) with variable-length stopping rules using the partial credit model. Previous simulation studies on CAT exposure control methods with polytomous items rarely considered variable-length tests. The four exposure control techniques examined were the randomesque with a group of three items, randomesque with a group of six items, progressive-restricted standard error (PR-SE), and no exposure control. The two variable-length stopping rules included were the SE and predicted standard error reduction (PSER), along with three item pools of varied sizes (43, 86, and 172 items). Descriptive statistics on number of nonconvergent cases, measurement precision, testing burden, item overlap, item exposure, and pool utilization were calculated. Results revealed that the PSER stopping rule administered fewer items on average while maintaining measurement precision similar to the SE stopping rule across the different item pool sizes and exposure controls. The PR-SE exposure control procedure surpassed the randomesque methods by further reducing test overlap, maintaining maximum exposure rates at the target rate or lower, and utilizing all items from the pool with a minimal increase in number of items administered and nonconvergent cases.

Factor Structure of the Community Reintegration of Service-Members (CRIS) in Veterans with Blast-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Veterans with blast-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) report difficulty engaging in life roles, also referred to as participation. Current measures are either global or lack comprehensive coverage of life roles and have not been validated in Veterans with mTBI. The Community Reintegration of Service-members instrument (CRIS) is a promising measure that was specifically developed for Veterans using a well-formulated conceptual framework and Rasch analysis. However, the CRIS has not been validated in Veterans with mTBI. Two data sets were combined for 191 Veterans with blast-related mTBI to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis of the CRIS. High residual and low loading items (33) were removed to improve the model fit. The remaining items demonstrated high correlation (0.87-0.89) between subscales and high test re-test (0.85 to 0.95). Mean scores were better for Veterans without Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) or depression compared to Veterans with PTSD or depression. The refined CRIS offers a valid comprehensive measure of participation for Veterans with blast-related mTBI. Future directions include examining aspects of participation that may not be covered by the CRIS for Veterans with mTBI..

Psychometric Properties of 2 Participation Measures in Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the psychometric properties of 2 commonly used participation measures: the Community Reintegration of Service Members (CRIS) and the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O) in veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). DESIGN: Data were collected from 2 cross-sectional observation studies conducted in 2 Veterans Affairs medical centers. SETTING: Questionnaires were completed in-person or by mail. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans with mTBI (N=201) were recruited from the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston (n=94) and the Malcom Randall North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System (n=107). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CRIS and PART-O. RESULTS: We conducted Rasch analysis on the PART-O and on 3 subscales of the CRIS (extent of participation, perceived limitation, and satisfaction). For PART-O, results showed PART-O has questionable unidimensionality. For both instruments, some rating categories were underused, and rating scales did not advance accordingly. Compared with PART-O, the CRIS was able to distinguish more categories of person's ability (>5 vs 2 for PART-O) and had better internal consistency as indicated by higher Cronbach α (.96-.98 vs .65 for PART-O). CONCLUSIONS: To capture participation unique to veterans with mTBI, CRIS has greater potential to detect a change in participation and is therefore recommended over PART-O. Rating scales of both instruments, however, need further refinement. We suggest future studies examine collapsed rating categories and use qualitative methods to redefine categories.

Response to goal management training in veterans with blast-related mild traumatic brain injury.

Veterans with blast-related mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) experience cognitive deficits that interfere with functional activities. Goal Management Training (GMT), which is a metacognitive intervention, offers an executive function rehabilitation approach that draws upon theories concerning goal processing and sustained attention. GMT has received empirical support in studies of patients with TBI but has not been tested in Veterans with blast-related mild TBI. GMT was modified from 7 weekly to 10 biweekly sessions. Participants included six combat Veterans that reported multiple blast exposures resulting in symptoms consistent with mild TBI. Group analysis showed a significant improvement in measures of executive function derived from performance on the computerized Tower of London. There were no significant changes on self/informant questionnaires of executive function, indicating a lack of generalization of improvement from the clinic to everyday activities. Overall, while the data indicate efficacy of GMT in the rehabilitation of combat Veterans with executive function deficits because of blast-related mild TBI, enhancement of generalization is needed.

The item level psychometrics of the behaviour rating inventory of executive function-adult (BRIEF-A) in a TBI sample.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the psychometrics of the BRIEF-A are adequate for individuals diagnosed with TBI. RESEARCH DESIGN: A prospective observational study in which the BRIEF-A was collected as part of a larger study. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Informant ratings of the 75-item BRIEF-A on 89 individuals diagnosed with TBI were examined to determine items level psychometrics for each of the two BRIEF-A indexes: Behaviour Rating Index (BRI) and Metacognitive Index (MI). Patients were either outpatients or at least 1 year post-injury. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Each index measured a latent trait, separating individuals into five-to-six ability levels and demonstrated good reliability (0.94 and 0.96). Four items were identified that did not meet the infit criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide support for the use of the BRIEF-A as a supplemental assessment of executive function in TBI populations. However, further validation is needed with other measures of executive function. Recommendations include use of the index scores over the Global Executive Composite score and use of the difficulty hierarchy for setting therapy goals.

Conceptualizing functional cognition in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To conceptualize functional cognitive constructs across the continuum of traumatic brain injury (TBI) recovery, to form the foundation for the Computer Adaptive Measure of Functional Cognition for TBI (CAMFC-TBI). BACKGROUND: TBI often has a profound impact on a survivor's ability to return to previous level of functioning and significantly reduces the overall quality of life for survivors and caregivers. Few assessments are designed to evaluate TBI's impact on cognitive functioning in everyday life. Neuropsychological tests are time consuming and may have questionable ecological validity for predicting functional outcomes. Global functional assessments contain few cognitive items and may lack psychometric rigour. Presently there is a lack of efficient, precise, ecologically valid functional cognitive measures. MAIN OUTCOME AND RESULTS: Studies that used neuropsychological and global functional assessments were reviewed to direct conceptualization of functional cognitive constructs across TBI recovery stages. An advisory panel reviewed study methodology and functional cognitive constructs development. They validated the need for the CAMFC-TBI and the six functional cognitive constructs: attention, memory, processing speed, executive functioning, social communication and emotional management. CONCLUSION: Conceptualizing functional cognitive constructs is the first step in CAMFC-TBI development. Future project stages include item pool development, qualitative testing, field-testing, psychometric analysis and computerized adaptive test programming.

Traumatic brain injury and driving assessment: an evidence-based literature review.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a literature review of assessment tools predicting driving performance for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHOD: Data sources were Web of Science, EBSCOhost, PubMed, and recently published literature from experts and team members not yet catalogued in the databases. We used the American Academy of Neurology's classification criteria to extract data from 13 studies, and we assigned a class (I-IV, with I being the highest level of evidence) to each study. We grouped primary studies into categories of driving assessment (neuropsychological; simulator; off-road; self-report, other report, and postinjury disability status; and comprehensive driving evaluation) and synthesized the predictability of these tools as it relates to driving performance for people with TBI. CONCLUSIONS: To assist clinicians and researchers in making decisions regarding testing the driving performance of people with TBI, we provide recommendations for neuropsychological tests; off-road tests; self-report, other report, and postinjury disability status; and comprehensive driving evaluation.