Canadian nurse initiated analgesia protocol to reduce delays in the emergency department: A quality improvement study.

BACKGROUND: Australian literature supports nurse-initiated opioid analgesia protocols may be effective, but this practice is not yet widely adopted in Canada. LOCAL PROBLEM: Previous quality audits of Emergency Departments (EDs) in Victoria (Canada) indicate long delays to administration of analgesia. METHODS: Two tertiary care hospitals in a Canadian city of approximately 400,000 people were chosen for a quality improvement initiative. A manual retrospective chart review was conducted on a total of 122 patients which was compared to data from 125 patients from a previous audit in 2019. INTERVENTIONS: ED nursing staff both hospitals were provided education and daily reminders to document pain score at triage, and to flag an acute analgesia opioid order set on the charts of patients with moderate or severe pain (greater than 4 out of 10 in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) or by triage nurse's clinical judgment). At Victoria General Hospital (VGH), nurses had the option of finding an emergency physician (EP) to sign the acute analgesia opioid order set, or independently administer IV opioids from a presigned order set without consulting an EP. At Royal Jubilee Hospital (RJH), nursing staff could only administer IV opioids from the order set after an EP was consulted. Median time to opioid analgesia after the intervention was compared to 2019 data for each hospital. RESULTS: Each hospital significantly reduced median time to administration of opioids: VGH achieved 45.6 % reduction (1 h 8 min improvement, p = 0.001) and RJH achieved a 62.5 % reduction (2 h 11 min improvement, p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes indicated patients may receive analgesia faster when the opioid protocol was nurse initiated (median 43 minutes) vs physician initiated (median 1 h 1 min) at VGH. Pain score documentation at triage improved from <10 % in 2019 to >50 % in 2020 at both sites. Approximately 95 % of EP and nursing staff thought nurse-initiated opioids are safe, effective, and should be supported by regulatory boards. CONCLUSION: Implementing a new triage protocol to expedite initiation of an analgesic protocol was associated with significantly reduced time to analgesia for patients with moderate to severe pain. Time reductions may be greater with nurse-initiated analgesia before physician assessment.

Factors associated with frequent buprenorphine / naloxone initiation in a national survey of Canadian emergency physicians.

OBJECTIVE: To identify individual and site-related factors associated with frequent emergency department (ED) buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) initiation. BUP initiation, an effective opioid use disorder (OUD) intervention, varies widely across Canadian EDs. METHODS: We surveyed emergency physicians in 6 Canadian provinces from 2018 to 2019 using bilingual paper and web-based questionnaires. Survey domains included BUP-related practice, demographics, attitudes toward BUP, and site characteristics. We defined frequent BUP initiation (the primary outcome) as at least once per month, high OUD prevalence as at least one OUD patient per shift, and high OUD resources as at least 3 out of the following 5 resources: BUP initiation pathways, BUP in ED, peer navigators, accessible addiction specialists, and accessible follow-up clinics. We excluded responses from sites with <50% participation (to minimize non-responder bias) and those missing the primary outcome. We used univariate analysis to identify associations between frequent BUP initiation and factors of interest, stratifying by OUD prevalence. RESULTS: We excluded 3 responses for missing BUP initiation frequency and 9 for low response rate at one ED. Of the remaining 649 respondents from 34 EDs, 374 (58%) practiced in metropolitan areas, 384 (59%) reported high OUD prevalence, 312 (48%) had high OUD resources, and 161 (25%) initiated BUP frequently. Age, gender, board certification and years in practice were not associated with frequent BUP initiation. Site-specific factors were associated with frequent BUP initiation (high OUD resources [OR 6.91], high OUD prevalence [OR 4.45], and metropolitan location [OR 2.39],) as were individual attitudinal factors (willingness, confidence, and responsibility to initiate BUP.) Similar associations persisted in the high OUD prevalence subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Individual attitudinal and site-specific factors were associated with frequent BUP initiation. Training to increase physician confidence and increasing OUD resources could increase BUP initiation and benefit ED patients with OUD.

A cross-sectional survey on buprenorphine-naloxone practice and attitudes in 22 Canadian emergency physician groups: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP) initiation in emergency departments improves follow-up and survival among patients with opioid use disorder. We aimed to assess self-reported BUP-related practices and attitudes among emergency physicians. METHODS: We designed a cross-sectional physician survey by adapting a validated questionnaire on opioid harm reduction practices, attitudes and barriers. We recruited physician leads from 6 Canadian provinces to administer surveys to the staff physicians in their emergency department groups between December 2018 and November 2019. We included academic and community non-locum emergency department staff physicians. We excluded responses from emergency department groups with response rates less than 50% to minimize nonresponse bias. Primary (BUP prescribing practices) and secondary (willingness and attitudes) outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: After excluding 1 group for low response (9/26 physicians), 652 of 798 (81.7%) physicians responded from 22 groups serving 34 emergency departments. Among respondents, 64.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.4%-67.8%, emergency department group range 7.1%-100.0%) had prescribed BUP at least once in their career, 38.4% had prescribed it for home initiation and 24.8% prescribed it at least once a month. Overall, 68.9% (95% CI 65.3%-72.4%, emergency department group range 24.1%-97.6%) were willing to administer BUP, 64.2% felt it was a major responsibility and 37.1% felt they understood people who use drugs. Respondents most frequently rated lack of adequate training (58.2%) and lack of time (55.2%) as very important barriers to BUP initiation. INTERPRETATION: Two-thirds of the emergency physicians surveyed prescribed BUP, although only one-quarter did so regularly and one-third prescribed it for home initiation; wide variation between emergency department groups existed. Strategies to increase BUP initiation must address physicians' lack of time and training for BUP initiation and improve their understanding of people who use drugs.