[Health economic evaluation of rehabilitative short-term care : Analysis of the costs of geriatric patients with and without rehabilitative short-term care after inpatient hospital stay]. / Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation einer rehabilitativen Kurzzeitpflege : Ermittlung der Kosten von geriatrischen Patienten mit und ohne rehabilitative Kurzzeitpflege nach stationärem Krankenhausaufenthalt.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric patients requiring rehabilitation and admitted to short-term care after an acute inpatient hospital stay seldom receive rehabilitative services later. Rehabilitative short-term care (REKUP) supplements short-term care with rehabilitative measures, aiming to prevent functional restrictions and long-term care. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost and cost-effectiveness analyses of REKUP and provide data for a nationwide rollout. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A non-randomized controlled prospective study was carried out. The intervention group (IG) was paired 1:2 with a control group (KG), resulting in the formation of three collectives with follow-up periods of either 30, 90 or 180 days (each with IG and KG). Using administrative claims data from the AOK Baden-Württemberg, the mean total costs from the perspective of the health insurance were calculated. A potential impact of the intervention on costs was analyzed using the difference in differences approach. RESULTS: The analysis comprised 129 patients (IG 43; KG 86). During the follow-up periods, the IG presented higher rates of rehabilitation and lower rates of long-term care and mortality. Regarding costs, no statistically significant differences were found between the IG and KG in any of the three collectives. For nursing care and medication costs, costs were significantly higher in the follow-up period for the KG, whereas costs for rehabilitation were significantly higher for the IG (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Patients receiving REKUP utilize rehabilitation services more often and have a lower likelihood of requiring nursing care or dying with no statistically significant differences in costs. There are potential advantages of REKUP in the target population, which warrant further investigation due to methodological limitations.

Assessment of innovative living and care arrangements for persons with dementia: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Alternative forms of housing for persons with dementia have been developed in recent decades. These concepts offer small groups of residents familiar settings combined with efforts to provide normal daily life. The aim of this systematic review is to collate and analyze these more innovative forms of housing regarding residents' quality of life, behavioral aspects, as well as functional, cognitive and emotional aspects. METHODS: Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and PsycInfo in November 2020. Studies comparing traditional and more innovative living environments for persons with dementia were eligible. Concepts are described based on the results of additional searches. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed using checklists from the Joanna Briggs Institute. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies corresponding to 11 different concepts were included, namely Green Houses (USA), Group Living (Sweden), Cantou (France), Group Homes (Japan), Small-scale Group Living (Austria), Special Care Facilities (Canada), Shared-housing Arrangements (Germany), Residential Groups (Germany), Residential Care Centers / Woodside Places (USA/Canada), Small-scale Living (Netherlands/ Belgium), and Green Care Farms (Netherlands). The concepts are broadly similar in terms of care concepts, but partly differ in group sizes, staff qualifications and responsibilities. Several studies indicate that innovative forms of housing may encourage social behavior, preserve activity performance and/or positively influence emotional status compared to more traditional settings, while other studies fail to demonstrate these effects. Some studies also show increased behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in residents who live in more innovative housing concepts. The effect on cognition remains indistinct. DISCUSSION: The positive effects may be attributable to the inherent characteristics, including small group sizes, a stimulating design, and altered staff roles and responsibilities. Arguably, some of these characteristics might also be the reason for increased BPSD. Studies had variable methodological quality and results have to be considered with caution. Future research should examine these effects more closely and should investigate populations' preferences with regards to housing in the event of dementia.

[Medical care of patients with spasticity following stroke : Evaluation of the treatment situation in Germany with focus on the use of botulinum toxin]. / Versorgung von Patienten mit Spastik nach Schlaganfall : Evaluation der Versorgungssituation in Deutschland mit dem Fokus auf den Einsatz von Botulinumtoxin.

BACKGROUND: Upper limb spasticity is a common complication following stroke. Cohort studies found 19% of post-stroke patients had upper limb spasticity at 3 months and 38% of patients at 12 months. For focal spasticity, intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin are indicated. In Germany, it is assumed that patients with the described indication are undersupplied with botulinum toxin. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the medical care of patients with upper limb spasticity post-stroke with the focus on the use of botulinum toxin as one treatment option. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was developed and a postal survey of a representative national random sample of 800 neurologists to capture the actual medical care situation. RESULTS: The response rate amounted to 37% (n = 292). 59% of the neurologists surveyed had never used botulinum toxin. In total, 87% of neurologists noticed barriers regarding the use of botulinum toxin, where the amount of the doctor's remuneration in 40% and the lack of reimbursement of costs in off-label use in 60% were the most commonly used answers. The achievement of an advanced training in using botulinum toxin was also stated as a general obstacle for resident neurologists. DISCUSSION: Due to a response rate of 37% for the postal survey a selection bias cannot be excluded. Although botulinum toxin is recommended in the national treatment guidelines, many neurologists do not use botulinum toxin. The reasons can be seen from the barriers described.

Evaluation of an integrated care program for schizophrenia: concept and study design.

Concept and design of an independent scientific evaluation of different pathways of care for schizophrenia patients in Germany with respect to effectiveness and efficiency are presented. In this prospective, observational study, schizophrenia patients receiving an integrated care treatment, the intervention group (IG), are compared with patients under routine care conditions treated by the same physician (first control group, CG 1). A second control group (CG 2) of patients treated by office-based psychiatrists not participating in the integrated care program will be recruited and their data compared with the two other groups. The total amount of psychiatric hospital days after 12 months is defined as primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcome parameters comprise the frequency of psychiatric inpatient readmissions, severity of schizophrenia symptoms, remission rates and quality of life. Patients undergo assessments at baseline, month 6 and 12 using standardized and experimental questionnaires. Routine data of a regional German social health insurance fund complement information on included patients. Additionally, a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis will be performed. Until now, 137 psychiatrists included 980 patients in the integrated care project in Lower Saxony, Germany, and 47 psychiatrists (IG and both CGs) are willing to participate in the independent evaluation. For the first time, a prospective observational controlled evaluation study of a countrywide integrated care project planning to recruit 500 schizophrenia patients has started using comprehensive assessments as well as routine data of a social health insurance fund.

[The health-care situation in outpatient psychiatry--results of a survey among members of the Germany Association of Psychotherapists (DPtV)]. / Zur Versorgungslage im Bereich der ambulanten Psychotherapie--Ergebnisse einer Erhebung unter den Mitgliedern der Deutschen Psychotherapeuten Vereinigung (DPtV).

BACKGROUND: Mental-health problems are of increasing importance in the German population. Nonetheless there is a lack of data concerning outpatient psychotherapeutic care, especially with a focus on psychotherapy sessions approved by social health insurances and performed by psychological psychotherapists and paediatric psychotherapists. METHODS: The study presents the results of a survey among all members of the German Association of Psychotherapists (DPtV) and is based on questionnaires filled in by 2,497 psychotherapists (return rate 33.3%). The assessment is based on the therapists' data without an external validation. Main topics of the survey were characteristics of the supply of psychotherapeutic care, therapeutic time contingents per patient and their utilisation and demographic and socio-economic features of patients. Evaluating the survey, the results were analysed overall and by groups of therapists varying in demographic features, professional qualifications and regional criteria, using bivariate as well as multivariate methods. RESULTS: The study provides evidence indicating an underprovision of outpatient psychotherapeutic care. Psychotherapists who use a waiting list reported average waiting times of more than 2.5 months. Additionally there are differences in psychotherapeutic care between various patient groups. In regions with lower population density we found less provision of psychotherapeutic care compared to regions with higher population density. Taking into account epidemiological data, the study indicates that the participation of men, persons of older age and patients with lower levels of education in psychotherapeutic care is below average. CONCLUSION: The results suggest a considerable degree of underprovision and inadequate provision of outpatient psychotherapeutic care. With regard to special population groups, further research is necessary to identify utilisation barriers towards psychotherapy.

[Remuneration distribution - should morbidity-dependent overall remuneration also be distributed after adjustments for morbidity?]. / Honorarverteilung - sollte die morbiditätsbedingte Gesamtvergütung auch morbiditätsadjustiert verteilt werden?

INTRODUCTION: In the 2009 reform of the German collective remuneration system for outpatient medical care, on the level of overall remuneration, the morbidity risk was transferred to the health funds fulfilling a long-term demand of physicians. Nevertheless not transferring morbidity adjustment to the levels of physician groups and singular practices can lead to budgets not related to patient needs and to incentives for risk selection for individual doctors. METHODS: The systematics of the distribution of overall remuneration in the German remuneration system for outpatient care are analysed focusing on the aspect of morbidity adjustment. Using diagnostic and pharmaceutical information of about half a million insured subjects, a risk adjustment model able to predict individual expenditures for outpatient care for different provider groups is presented. This model enables to additively split the individual care burden into several parts attributed to different physician groups. Conditions for the use of the model in the distribution of overall remuneration between physician groups are developed. A simulation of the use of diagnoses-based risk adjustment in standard service volumes then highlights the conditions for a successfull installation of standard service volumes representing a higher degree of risk adjustment. RESULTS: The presented estimation model is generally applicable for the distribution of overall remuneration to different physician groups. The simulation of standard service volumes using diagnosis-based risk adjustment does not provide a more accurate prediction of the expenditures on the level of physician practices than the age-related calculation currently used in the German remuneration system for outpatient medical care. CONCLUSION: Using elements of morbidity-based risk adjustment the current German collective system for outpatient medical care could be transformed towards a higher degree of distributional justice concerning medical care for patients and more appropriate incentives avoiding risk selection. Limitations of the applicability of risk-adjustment can be especially pointed out when a high share of lump-sum-payments is used for the remuneration of some physician groups.