Helicopter Transport From the Scene of Injury: Are There Improved Outcomes for Pediatric Trauma Patients?

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting data to support the routine use of helicopter transport (HT) for the transfer of trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes for trauma patients transported via helicopter from the scene of injury to a regional pediatric trauma center. METHODS: The institutional trauma registry was queried for trauma patients presenting from January 2000 through March 2012. Of 9119 patients, 1709 patients who presented from the scene were selected for further evaluation. This cohort was stratified into HT and ground transport (GT) for analysis. Associations between mode of transport and outcomes were estimated using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals from multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty-five patients (42.4%) presented via HT, whereas 984 (57.6%) presented via GT. Patients arriving by HT had a higher Injury Severity Score, lower Glasgow Coma Scale, were less likely to undergo surgery within 3 hours, more likely to present after motorized trauma, and had longer intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariate analysis controlling for Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale, mechanism of injury, scene distance, and time to arrive to the hospital revealed that patients arriving by HT were more likely to have longer hospital LOS compared with those arriving by GT (odds ratios = 2.3, 95% confidence interval = 1.00-5.28, P = 0.049). However, no statistically significant association was observed for prehospital intubation, surgery within 3 hours, ICU admissions, or ICU LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients arriving by helicopter are more severely injured and arrive from greater distances, when controlling for injuries, scene distance, and time to hospital arrival, only hospital LOS was significantly affected by HT.

Impact of outpatient management following appendectomy for acute appendicitis: An ACS NSQIP-P analysis.

BACKGROUND: In 2012, a same-day discharge protocol following appendectomy for acute appendicitis was initiated. Our objective was to determine the success of the protocol by reviewing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-P) outcomes following protocol development. METHODS: The 2015 NSQIP-P Participant Use Data File was queried to identify patients with acute appendicitis who underwent appendectomy. Outcomes were compared to institutional outcomes. RESULTS: There were 154 institutional patients and 4973 from NSQIP-P centers. Institutional rate of outpatient management was higher compared to NSQIP-P (84% vs 48%, p<0.0001). Surgical length of stay was shorter compared to national rates (0.3±0.7 vs 1.1±1.9days, p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of superficial (1.9% vs 1.0%, p=0.2), deep (0.6% vs 0.1%, p=0.17) or organ/space surgical site infections (1.3% vs 0.7%, p=0.31). The incidences of other complications (1.3% vs 0.6%, p=0.26) and 30-day readmissions (3.2% vs 2.6%, p=0.61) were similar. CONCLUSION: Outpatient management following appendectomy in children is possible with low morbidity and readmission rates. Comparison with other NSQIP-Pediatric centers suggests an opportunity to generalize this practice with considerable savings to the health care system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis study, level II.

Enhancing recovery after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum.

PURPOSE: There are variations in the perioperative management of patients who undergo minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). The purpose is to analyze the change in resource utilization after implementation of a standardized practice plan and describe an enhanced recovery pathway. METHODS: A standardized practice plan was implemented in 2013. A retrospective review of patients who underwent MIRPE from 2012 to 2015 was performed to evaluate the trends in resource utilization. A pain management protocol was implemented and a retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent repair before (2010-2012) and after (2014-2015) implementation. RESULTS: There were 71 patients included in the review of resource utilization. After implementation, there was a decrease in intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), and laboratory and radiologic studies ordered. There were 64 patients included in the pain protocol analysis. After implementation, postoperative morphine equivalents (3.3 ± 1.4 vs 1.2 ± 0.5 mg/kg, p < 0.01), urinary retention requiring catheterization (33 vs 14%, p = 0.07), and LOS (4 ± 1 vs 2.8 ± 0.8 days, p < 0.01) decreased. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway is a feasible and effective way to reduce resource utilization and improve outcomes in pediatric patients who undergo minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided vs. intraoperative rectus sheath block for pediatric umbilical hernia repair: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia is commonly used in children. Our hypothesis was that percutaneous ultrasound-guided (PERC) rectus sheath blocks would result in lower postoperative pain scores compared to intraoperative (IO) rectus sheath blocks following umbilical hernia repair. METHODS: A single-institution randomized blinded trial was conducted in pediatric patients undergoing elective umbilical hernia repair. The primary outcome was mean postoperative Wong-Baker pain score. Secondary outcomes included narcotic requirements and length of postoperative stay. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included: 28 PERC and 30 IO. Operating room time was significantly longer in the PERC group (41 vs. 35min, p<0.01). Mean postoperative pain scores (PERC-2.6 vs. IO-3.3, p=0.11), morphine equivalents intraoperatively (PERC-0 vs. IO-0.04mg/kg, p=0.29) and postoperatively (PERC-0.04 vs. IO-0.09mg/kg, p=0.17), time to first postoperative narcotic dose (PERC-30 vs. IO-22min, p=0.33, log-rank test), and postoperative length of stay (PERC-76 vs. IO-80min, p=0.44) were similar. CONCLUSION: Following umbilical hernia repair in children, percutaneous ultrasound-guided and intraoperative rectus sheath blocks resulted in similar mean postoperative pain scores. There were no differences in secondary outcomes such as time to first narcotic, narcotic requirements, and length of stay. The additional resources required to complete a percutaneous ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block may not be warranted. TYPE OF STUDY: Randomized controlled trial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.