Risk Factors for Reoperation Following Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty as Utilized in a Representative Sample of United States Clinical Practice: A Retrospective PearlDiver Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVES: Most data regarding cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) outcomes are from highly controlled clinical trials with strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. This study aimed to identify risk factors for CDA reoperation, in "real world" clinical practice using a national insurance claims database. METHODS: The PearlDiver database was queried for patients (2010-2020) who underwent a subsequent cervical procedure following a single-level CDA. Patients with less than 2 years follow-up were excluded. Primary outcome was to evaluate risk factors for reoperation. Secondary outcome was to evaluate the types of reoperations. Risk factors were compared using descriptive statistics. Multivariate regression analyses were used to ascertain the association among risk factors and reoperation. RESULTS: Of 14,202 patients who met inclusion criteria, 916 (6.5%) underwent reoperation. Patients undergoing reoperation were slightly older with higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores, however both were not risk factors for reoperation. Patients with diagnoses such as smoking, myelopathy, inflammatory disorders, spinal deformity, trauma, or a history of prior cervical surgery were at greater risk for reoperation. No association was found between the year of index surgery and reoperation risk. The most common reoperation procedure was cervical fusion. CONCLUSIONS: As billed for in the United States since 2010, CDA was associated with a 6.5% reoperation rate over a mean follow-up time of 5.3 years. Smoking, myelopathy, inflammatory disorders, spinal deformity, and a history of prior cervical surgery or trauma are risk factors for reoperation following CDA. Though patients who underwent a reoperation were older, age was not found to be an independent risk factor for a subsequent procedure.

Reliability of a Novel Classification System for Thoracic Disc Herniations.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the reliability of a proposed novel classification system for thoracic disc herniations (TDHs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: TDHs are complex entities varying substantially in many factors, including size, location, and calcification. To date, no comprehensive system exists to categorize these lesions. METHODS: Our proposed system classifies 5 types of TDHs using anatomic and clinical characteristics, with subtypes for calcification. Type 0 herniations are small (≤40% of spinal canal) TDHs without significant spinal cord or nerve root effacement; type 1 are small and paracentral; type 2 are small and central; type 3 are giant (>40% of spinal canal) and paracentral; and type 4 are giant and central. Patients with types 1 to 4 TDHs have correlative clinical and radiographic evidence of spinal cord compression. Twenty-one US spine surgeons with substantial TDH experience rated 10 illustrative cases to determine the system's reliability. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were determined using the Fleiss kappa coefficient. Surgeons were also surveyed to obtain consensus on surgical approaches for the various TDH types. RESULTS: High agreement was found for the classification system, with 80% (range 62% to 95%) overall agreement and high interrater and intrarater reliability (kappa 0.604 [moderate to substantial agreement] and kappa 0.630 [substantial agreement], respectively). All surgeons reported nonoperative management of type 0 TDHs. For type 1 TDHs, most respondents (71%) preferred posterior approaches. For type 2 TDHs, responses were roughly equivalent for anterolateral and posterior options. For types 3 and 4 TDHs, most respondents (72% and 68%, respectively) preferred anterolateral approaches. CONCLUSIONS: This novel classification system can be used to reliably categorize TDHs, standardize description, and potentially guide the selection of surgical approach. Validation of this system with regard to treatment and clinical outcomes represents a line of future study.

Is single-level cervical disc arthroplasty associated with a lower reoperation rate than anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

OBJECTIVE: Long-term meta-analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) trials report lower rates of subsequent cervical spine surgical procedures with CDA compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The objective of this study was to compare the rate of subsequent cervical spine surgery in single-level CDA-treated patients to that of a matched cohort of single-level ACDF-treated patients by using records from 2010 to 2021 included in a large national administrative claims database (PearlDiver). METHODS: This retrospective matched-cohort study used a large national insurance claims database; 525,510 patients who had undergone a single-level ACDF or CDA between 2010 and 2021 were identified. Patients with other same-day spine procedures, as well as those for trauma, infection, or tumor, were excluded, yielding 148,531 patients. ACDF patients were matched 2:1 to CDA patients on the basis of clinical and demographic characteristics. The primary outcome was the overall incidence of all-cause cervical reoperation after index surgery. Secondary outcomes included readmission, any adverse event within 90 days, and overall reintervention after index surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were adjusted for covariates and were employed to estimate the effect of the index ACDF or CDA procedure on patient outcomes. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimation, and differences between ACDF- and CDA-treated patients were compared using log-rank tests. RESULTS: After the patients were matched, 28,795 ACDF patients to 14,504 CDA patients were included. ACDF patients had higher rates of 90-day adverse events (18.4% vs 14.6%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.82, p < 0.001) and readmission (11.5% vs 9.7%, aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.93, p < 0.001). Over a mean 4.3 years of follow-up, 5.0% of ACDF patients and 5.4% of CDA patients underwent reoperation (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.19, p = 0.059). The rate of aggregate reintervention was higher in CDA patients than in ACDF patients (11.7% vs 10.7%, aOR 1.10, p = 0.002). The Kaplan-Meier 10-year reoperation-free survival rate was worse for CDA than ACDF (91.0% vs 92.0%, p = 0.05), as was the rate of reintervention-free survival (81.2% vs 82.0%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Single-level CDA was associated with a similar rate of reoperation and higher rate of subsequent injections when compared with a matched cohort that underwent single-level ACDF. CDA was associated with lower rates of 90-day adverse events and readmissions.

Cluster Analysis reveals Socioeconomic Disparities among Elective Spine Surgery Patients.

This work demonstrates the use of cluster analysis in detecting fair and unbiased novel discoveries. Given a sample population of elective spinal fusion patients, we identify two overarching subgroups driven by insurance type. The Medicare group, associated with lower socioeconomic status, exhibited an over-representation of negative risk factors. The findings provide a compelling depiction of the interwoven socioeconomic and racial disparities present within the healthcare system, highlighting their consequential effects on health inequalities. The results are intended to guide design of fair and precise machine learning models based on intentional integration of population stratification.

New technique and case report: Robot-assisted intralaminar screw fixation of spondylolysis in an adolescent.

Introduction: Management of spondylolysis in adolescents is generally successful with conservative management. Uncommonly, surgical fixation is necessary for refractory cases. Direct repair with intralaminar screws is one commonly utilized technique. Recently, less invasive spinal procedures are becoming viable with the enabling of technologies, including robotics. Case description: A 14-year-old baseball player and surfer presented with low back pain, diagnosed by MRI as bony edema and stress fractures of the posterior spinal elements. After 18 months, the pain was unresponsive to rest, physical therapy, and bracing. There was no radicular pain or neurologic symptoms. Computed tomography (CT) revealed bilateral, chronic nonhealing pars defects at L5. He underwent outpatient, robot-assisted percutaneous intralaminar fixation with hydroxyapatite-coated screws through a 2 cm skin incision. Outcome: On postoperative day 1, the patient reported relief of his preoperative pain and he was ambulating without difficulty. At 2 weeks follow-up, the patient was completely pain free and surfing. At 2 months follow-up, low-dose CT demonstrated partial incorporation of the hydroxyapatite-coated screws, and the patient returned to sports. At 6 months follow-up, the patient had no pain and was swinging his baseball bat with full force. Low-dose CT revealed complete healing of the defects with full incorporation of the hydroxyapatite-coated screws. Conclusions: A novel minimally invasive robotic percutaneous approach for direct spondylolysis repair using hydroxyapatite-coated screws is a potential surgical treatment option for non-healing pars defects in adolescent patients.

Complications Have Not Improved With Newer Generation Robots.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to see whether upgrades in newer generation robots improve safety and clinical outcomes following spine surgery. METHODS: All patients undergoing robotic-assisted spine surgery with the Mazor X Stealth EditionTM (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) from 2019 to 2022 at a combined orthopedic and neurosurgical spine service were retrospectively reviewed. Robot related complications were recorded. RESULTS: 264 consecutive patients (54.1% female; age at time of surgery 63.5 ± 15.3 years) operated on by 14 surgeons were analyzed. The average number of instrumented levels with robotics was 4.2 ± 2.7, while the average number of instrumented screws with robotics was 8.3 ± 5.3. There was a nearly 50/50 split between an open and minimally invasive approach. Six patients (2.2%) had robot related complications. Three patients had temporary nerve root injuries from misplaced screws that required reoperation, one patient had a permanent motor deficit from the tap damaging the L1 and L2 nerve roots, one patient had a durotomy from a misplaced screw that required laminectomy and intra-operative repair, and one patient had a temporary sensory L5 nerve root injury from a drill. Half of these complications (3/6) were due to a reference frame error. In total, four patients (1.5%) required reoperation to fix 10 misplaced screws. CONCLUSION: Despite newer generation robots, robot related complications are not decreasing. As half the robot related complications result from reference frame errors, this is an opportunity for improvement.

Pseudarthrosis after four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without posterior fixation.

OBJECTIVE: Fusion rates and long-term outcomes are well established for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) of 3 levels or fewer, but there is a paucity of similar data on 4-level fusions. The authors evaluated long-term fusion rates and clinical outcomes after 4-level ACDF without supplemental posterior instrumentation. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent 4-level ACDF at a single institution with at least 1-year of radiological follow-up. Fusion was determined by measuring change in interspinous distance at each segment on dynamic radiographs or by the presence of bridging bone on CT scans at minimum 1-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Neck Disability Index and Short Form-36. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients (252 levels) met the inclusion criteria for the study, with a mean follow-up of 2.6 years. Complete radiographic fusion at all 4 levels was observed in 26 patients (41.3%). Of the 37 patients (58.7%) with radiographic pseudarthrosis, there was a mean of 1.35 nonfused levels. The fusion rate per level, however, was 80.2% (202/252 levels). The most common level demonstrating nonunion was the distal segment (C6-7), showing pseudarthrosis in 29 patients (46.8%), followed by the most proximal segment (C3-4) demonstrating nonunion in 9 patients (14.5%). The mean improvement in Neck Disability Index and Short Form-36 was 15.7 (p < 0.01) and 5.8 (p = 0.14), respectively, with improvement in both scores surpassing the minimum clinically important difference. One patient (1.6%) required revision surgery for symptomatic pseudarthrosis, and 5 patients (7.9%) underwent revision for symptomatic adjacent-segment disease. Patient-reported outcomes results are limited by the low rate of 1-year follow-up (50.8%), whereas reoperation data were available for all 63 patients. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of patients undergoing 4-level ACDF without posterior fixation demonstrated pseudarthrosis of at least 1 level-most commonly the distal C6-7 level. One patient required revision for symptomatic pseudarthrosis. Patient-reported outcomes showed significant improvements at 1-year follow-up, but clinical follow-up was limited. This is the largest series to date to evaluate fusion outcomes in 4-level ACDF.

A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.

OBJECTIVE: Interbody fusion is the primary method for achieving arthrodesis across the lumbosacral junction in the setting of degenerative pathologies, such as spondylosis and spondylolisthesis. Two common techniques are anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). In recent years, interbody design and technology have advanced, and most earlier studies comparing ALIF and TLIF did not specifically assess the lumbosacral junction. This study compared changes in radiographic and clinical parameters between patients undergoing modern-era single-level ALIF and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) TLIF at L5-S1. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent single-segment L5-S1 ALIF or MIS TLIF performed by the senior authors over a 6-year interval (January 1, 2016-November 30, 2021) were retrospectively reviewed. Upright radiographs were used to determine pre- and postoperative lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc angle, and neuroforaminal height. Improvements in patient-reported outcome scores (Oswestry Disability Index and SF-36) were also compared. RESULTS: Overall, 108 patients (58 [54%] men, 50 [46%] women; mean [SD] age 57.6 [13.5] years) were included in the study. ALIF was performed in 49 patients, and TLIF was performed in 59 patients. The most common treatment indications were spondylolisthesis (50%, 54/108) and spondylosis (46%, 50/108). The cohorts did not differ in terms of intraoperative (p > 0.99) or postoperative (p = 0.73) complication rates. The mean (SD) hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for patients undergoing TLIF than ALIF (1.3 [0.6] days vs 2.0 [1.4] days, p < 0.001). Both techniques significantly improved L5-S1 segmental lordosis, disc angle, and neuroforaminal height (p ≤ 0.008). ALIF versus TLIF significantly increased mean [SD] segmental lordosis (12.5° [7.3°] vs 2.0° [5.7°], p < 0.001), disc angle (14.8° [5.5°] vs 3.0° [6.1°], p < 0.001), and neuroforaminal height (4.5 [4.6] mm vs 2.4 [3.0] mm, p = 0.008). Improvements in patient-reported outcome parameters and reoperation rates were similar between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: When treating patients at a single segment across the lumbosacral junction, ALIF resulted in significantly greater increases in segmental lordosis, L5-S1 disc angle, and neuroforaminal height compared with MIS TLIF. Improvements in clinical parameters and reoperation rates were similar between the 2 techniques.

Perioperative Complications Following Spine Surgery in Adult Patients with Achondroplasia.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To describe the common types of complications and their risk factors during spine surgery in patients with achondroplasia. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of medical records of adult achondroplasia patients who underwent spine surgery at our institution between 2007 and 2021. Inclusion criteria were achondroplasia and age >16 years. Surgical encounters were evaluated for durotomy, postoperative neurologic deficit, wound compromise, medical complications, and return to the operating room. Statistical analysis included evaluation of relationships across complications and fisher exact test applied to bivariate/categorical variables and t-test/ANOVA for continuous variables. Multivariable analysis using logistic regression was performed to account for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with achondroplasia underwent 95 surgeries. Forty-nine percent of the surgeries involved a complication. These included durotomy (33.7%), neurologic deficit (11.6%), wound compromise (6.3%), and other medical complications (6.3%). Thirteen percent of surgeries required return to the operating room. The greatest number of complications occurred in thoracolumbar region (60.0%) compared to cervicothoracic (18.2%) and craniocervical junction (33.3%). Chronologically later surgical encounters had decreased complications and durotomies only occurred in thoracolumbar surgeries (45.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with achondroplasia undergoing surgery chronologically later in this set of consecutive patients were at a decreased risk for complications. Thoracolumbar surgeries were at the greatest risk for durotomies. Male sex was a risk factor for durotomy, while age was a risk factor for neurologic deficit. The potential for adverse surgical events should be considered when evaluating patients with achondroplasia for spine surgery. .

Surgical treatment of young adults with idiopathic scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the authors report on their experience with the surgical treatment of young adults with idiopathic scoliosis (YAdISs) who did not have surgical treatment in adolescence but did require intervention after skeletal maturity. METHODS: The medical records of YAdISs between 18 and 40 years of age who had been surgically treated at two institutions between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Pre- and postoperative clinical and radiographic information was gathered and compared at 2 years after treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (9 male, 19 female) with a median age of 25 years (range 18-40 years) met the study inclusion criteria. Five patients (18%) had postoperative complications, including 2 deep venous thromboses, 1 ileus, and 2 reoperations, one for implant failure and the other for pseudarthrosis. The mean maximum coronal curve angle improved from 43° ± 12° to 17° ± 8° (p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, or thoracic kyphosis (p > 0.05). There was no relationship between the amount of correction obtained and patient age (p = 0.46). Significant improvements in the Oswestry Disability Index (31 vs 24, p = 0.02), visual analog scale score for both back pain (6.0 vs 4.0, p = 0.01) and leg pain (2.6 vs 1.1, p = 0.02), and self-image score (Δ1.1, p < 0.001) were seen. CONCLUSIONS: YAdISs can present with pain, deformity progression, and/or appearance dissatisfaction because of their scoliosis despite successful nonoperative management during adolescence. Once the scoliosis becomes symptomatic, surgical correction can result in significant clinical and radiographic improvements at the 2-year follow-up with a relatively low complication rate compared to that for other types of adult spinal deformity.

Minimally Invasive Retropleural Thoracic Diskectomy: Step-by-Step Operative Planning, Execution, and Results.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic disk herniation is rare and difficult to treat. The minimally invasive lateral retropleural approach to the thoracic spine enables the surgeon to decompress the neural elements and minimize thecal sac manipulation through direct visualization with less exposure-related morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To provide a detailed step-by-step overview of the minimally invasive retropleural approach for thoracic diskectomies, including preoperative planning through postoperative care as practiced at our institution. METHODS: Lateral retropleural thoracic diskectomies performed at a single institution from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2020, were reviewed. Clinical and outcome data were collected and analyzed. The retropleural approach was divided into several components: relevant anatomy, indications and contraindications, preoperative setup, exposure and approach, diskectomy, and closure and postoperative care. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated during the study interval. Their average (SD) age was 44.2 (9.5) years; 10 of 12 were men. Eleven patients presented with thoracic myelopathy. The level treated ranged from T6-7 to T12-L1. Disk herniations were calcified in 10 of 12 patients. These lesions were approached from the left side in 7 of 12 patients. Six patients had complications, none of which were neurological. Chest tubes were placed for pleural violation, pneumothorax, or hemothorax in 3 patients. Two patients experienced postoperative abdominal pseudohernia. Neurological symptoms were stable or improved in all patients. The median (IQR) Nurick scale improved from 3.0 (2.0-3.0) preoperatively to 1.0 (0-3.0) ( P = .026) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Lateral retropleural diskectomy enables safe, efficient resection of most thoracic disks while minimizing patient morbidity.

Evolution of Bioactive Implants in Lateral Interbody Fusion.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is an advantageous approach for spinal arthrodesis for a wide range of spinal disorders including degenerative, genetic, and traumatic conditions. LLIF techniques have evolved over the past 15 years regarding surgical approach, with concomitant improvements in implant material design. Bioactive materials have been a focus in the development of novel methods, which reduce the risk of subsidence and pseudarthrosis. Historically, polyetheretherketone and titanium cages have been selected for their advantageous biomechanical properties; however, both have their limitations, regarding optimal modulus or osseointegrative properties. Recent modifications to these 2 materials have focused on devising bioactive implants, which may enhance the rate of bony fusion in spinal arthrodesis by addressing the shortcomings of each. Specific emphasis has been placed on developing improvements in surface coating, porosity, microroughness, and nanotopography of interbody cages. This has been coupled with advances in additive manufacturing to generate cages with ideal biomechanical properties. Three-dimensional-printed titanium cages may be particularly beneficial in spinal arthrodesis during LLIF and reduce the historical rates of subsidence and pseudarthrosis by combining a number of these putatively beneficial biomaterial properties.

Kickstand rods and correction of coronal malalignment in patients with adult spinal deformity.

PURPOSE: Coronal malalignment (CM) is a challenging spinal deformity to treat. The kickstand rod (KR) technique is powerful for correcting truncal shift. This study tested the hypothesis that the KR technique provides superior coronal alignment correction in adult deformity compared with traditional rod techniques. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected multicenter database was performed. A 2:1 matched cohort of non-KR accessory rod and KR patients was planned based on preoperative coronal balance distance (CBD) and a vector of global shift. Patients were subgrouped according to CM classification with a 30-mm CBD threshold defining CM, and comparisons of surgical and clinical outcomes among groups was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with preoperative CM treated with a KR were matched to 36 controls. KR-treated patients had improved CBD compared with controls (18 vs. 35 mm, P < 0.01). The postoperative CBD did not result in clinical differences between groups in patient-reported outcomes (P ≥ 0.09). Eight (38%) of 21 KR patients and 12 (33%) of 36 control patients with preoperative CM had persistent postoperative CM (P = 0.72). CM class did not significantly affect the likelihood of treatment failure (postoperative CBD > 30 mm) in the KR cohort (P = 0.70), the control cohort (P = 0.35), or the overall population (P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Application of the KR technique to coronal spinal deformity in adults allows for successful treatment of CM. Compared to traditional rod techniques, the use of KRs did not improve clinical outcome measures 1 year after spinal deformity surgery but was associated with better postoperative coronal alignment.

Predictors of subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) facilitates the restoration of disc height and the indirect decompression of neural elements. However, these benefits are lost when the graft subsides into the adjacent endplates. The factors leading to subsidence after LLIF are poorly understood. This article presents a case series of patients who underwent LLIF and reports factors correlating with subsidence. METHODS: A retrospective review of a consecutive, prospectively collected, single-institution database of patients who underwent LLIF over a 29-month period was performed. The degree of subsidence was measured on the basis of postoperative imaging. The timing of postoperative subsidence was determined, and intraoperative fluoroscopic images were reviewed to determine whether subsidence occurred as a result of endplate violation. The association of subsidence with age, sex, cage size and type, bone density, and posterior instrumentation was investigated. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients underwent LLIF at a total of 204 levels. Subsidence was observed at 23 (11.3%) operated levels. True subsidence, attributable to postoperative cage settling, occurred for 12 (5.9%) of the levels; for the remaining 11 (5.4%) levels, subsidence was associated with intraoperative endplate violation noted on fluoroscopy during cage placement. All subsidence occurred within 12 weeks of surgery. Univariate analysis showed that the prevalence of true subsidence was significantly lower among patients with titanium implants (0 of 55; 0%) than among patients with polyetheretherketone cages (12 of 149; 8.1%) (p = 0.04). In addition, the mean ratio of graft area to inferior endplate area was significantly lower among the subsidence levels (0.34) than among the nonsubsidence levels (0.42) (p < 0.01). Finally, subsidence among levels with posterior fixation (4.4% [6/135]) was not significantly different than among those without posterior fixation (8.7% [6/69]) (p = 0.23). Multivariate analysis results showed that the ratio of cage to inferior endplate area was the only significant predictor of subsidence in this study (p < 0.01); increasing ratios were associated with a decreased likelihood of subsidence. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the prevalence of subsidence after LLIF was low in this clinical series. Titanium cages were associated with a lower prevalence of observed subsidence on univariate analysis; however, multivariate analysis demonstrated that this effect may be attributable to the increased surface area of these cages relative to the inferior endplate area.

Should Somatosensory and Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring Be Used Routinely in All Posterior Cervical Operations for Degenerative Conditions of the Cervical Spine?

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is useful during spinal cord operations, but whether IONM is necessary for posterior cervical surgeries for degenerative conditions is unknown. We evaluated the utility of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring as a tool for predicting new postoperative neurologic deficits during posterior decompression and fusion for degenerative cervical spine conditions. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed posterior cervical operations performed at our institute over a 4-year period. Patients with postoperative neurologic deficits were identified, and a detailed analysis performed to ascertain whether SSEP or MEP monitoring accurately predicted the onset of new postoperative deficits. RESULTS: Overall, 498 patients were included in the analysis (median age 66 years; range: 22-93 years). SSEP monitoring was performed in all patients, and both SSEP and MEP monitoring were performed in 121 patients (24%). Twenty-one patients (4.2%) had new postoperative neurologic deficits. SSEP had significantly higher specificity (90%) but lower sensitivity (33%) than MEP (74% specificity [P = 0.008], 50% sensitivity [P = 0.01]) for detecting neurologic compromise intraoperatively. For SSEP, the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) in detecting intraoperative changes that translated to new postoperative neurological deficits were 12% and 97%, respectively, whereas for MEP, the PPV and NPV were 6% (P = 0.009) and 98% (P = 0.20), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IONM during posterior cervical operations for degenerative conditions of the spine is not reliable at predicting new postoperative neurologic deficits in patients treated for degenerative conditions, but may provide peace of mind to the surgeon intraoperatively when no abnormalities are detected.

Accuracy of Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Using Direct Visualization Versus Computed Tomography-Based Navigation.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of operative data from cadaveric cervical spines. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of neuronavigation compared with laminotomy with direct visualization (DV) of the pedicle for placement of subaxial pedicle screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Subaxial pedicle screws provide superior fixation compared with other posterior cervical fixation strategies. However, high accuracy is required for safe placement, given the proximity of critical neurovascular structures. Computed tomography (CT)-based neuronavigation has increased in popularity for placement of spinal implants, including subaxial pedicle screws. However, the accuracy of the technique for this application has not been extensively evaluated. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric spines (occiput to T2) were prepared. Pedicle screws were placed from C3 to C7 on either side using either the DV or neuronavigation technique (alternating sides between specimens). Pedicles with diameters <4 mm were excluded. For the DV technique, a hemilaminotomy was performed for DV of pedicle borders and to determine appropriate screw medialization and trajectory. Neuronavigation screws were placed using CT-based navigation with a reference frame mounted on the C2 spinous process. Screw position was evaluated using postoperative CT, and breaches were classified using the Neo classification. RESULTS: Fifty pedicle screws were placed at 25 levels in 6 cadaveric spines; 25 screws each were placed using neuronavigation or DV. No significant difference in accuracy was found between the 2 techniques. Three (12%) breaches occurred in the DV group, and 9 (36%) breaches occurred in the neuronavigation group (P=0.10). The breaches were evenly distributed across all levels. There were no high-grade breaches with DV and only 1 (4.0%) with neuronavigation (P>0.99). Average pedicle cortical and medullary bone widths were higher for levels with no breach (P=0.009 and P=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: High accuracy can be achieved with both neuronavigation and DV for placement of subaxial cervical pedicle screws in cadavers.

Surgical anatomy of minimally invasive lateral approaches to the thoracolumbar junction.

OBJECTIVE: The thoracolumbar (TL) junction spanning T11 to L2 is difficult to access because of the convergence of multiple anatomical structures and tissue planes. Earlier studies have described different approaches and anatomical structures relevant to the TL junction. This anatomical study aims to build a conceptual framework for selecting and executing a minimally invasive lateral approach to the spine for interbody fusion at any level of the TL junction with appropriate adjustments for local anatomical variations. METHODS: The authors reviewed anatomical dissections from 9 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens as well as clinical case examples to denote key anatomical relationships and considerations for approach selection. RESULTS: The retroperitoneal and retropleural spaces reside within the same extracoelomic cavity and are separated from each other by the lateral attachments of the diaphragm to the rib and the L1 transverse process. If the lateral diaphragmatic attachments are dissected and the diaphragm is retracted anteriorly, the retroperitoneal and retropleural spaces will be in direct continuity, allowing full access to the TL junction. The T12-L2 disc spaces can be reached by a conventional lateral retroperitoneal exposure with the rostral displacement of the 11th and 12th ribs. With caudally displaced ribs, or to expose T12-L1 disc spaces, the diaphragm can be freed from its lateral attachments to perform a retrodiaphragmatic approach. The T11-12 disc space can be accessed purely through a retropleural approach without significant mobilization of the diaphragm. CONCLUSIONS: The entirety of the TL junction can be accessed through a minimally invasive extracoelomic approach, with or without manipulation of the diaphragm. Approach selection is determined by the region of interest, degree of diaphragmatic mobilization required, and rib anatomy.

Radiographic comparison of lordotic and hyperlordotic implants in L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) used at the lumbosacral junction provides arthrodesis for several indications. The anterior approach allows restoration of lumbar lordosis, an important goal of surgery. With hyperlordotic ALIF implants, several options may be employed to obtain the desired amount of lordosis. In this study, the authors compared the degree of radiographic lordosis achieved with lordotic and hyperlordotic ALIF implants at the L5-S1 segment. METHODS: All patients undergoing L5-S1 ALIF from 2 institutions over a 4-year interval were included. Patients < 18 years of age or those with any posterior decompression or osteotomy were excluded. ALIF implants in the lordotic group had 8° or 12° of inherent lordosis, whereas implants in the hyperlordotic group had 20° or 30° of lordosis. Upright standing radiographs were used to determine all radiographic parameters, including lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc space lordosis, and disc space height. Separate analyses were performed for patients who underwent single-segment fixation at L5-S1 and for the overall cohort. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included (hyperlordotic group, 93 [45.6%]; lordotic group, 111 [54.4%]). Single-segment ALIF at L5-S1 was performed in 74 patients (hyperlordotic group, 27 [36.5%]; lordotic group, 47 [63.5%]). The overall mean ± SD age was 61.9 ± 12.3 years; 58.3% of patients (n = 119) were women. The mean number of total segments fused was 3.2 ± 2.6. Overall, 66.7% (n = 136) of patients had supine surgery and 33.3% (n = 68) had lateral surgery. Supine positioning was significantly more common in the hyperlordotic group than in the lordotic group (83.9% [78/93] vs 52.3% [58/111], p < 0.001). After adjusting for differences in surgical positioning, the change in lumbar lordosis was significantly greater for hyperlordotic versus lordotic implants (3.6° ± 7.5° vs 0.4° ± 7.5°, p = 0.048) in patients with single-level fusion. For patients receiving hyperlordotic versus lordotic implants, changes were also significantly greater for segmental lordosis (12.4° ± 7.5° vs 8.4° ± 4.9°, p = 0.03) and disc space lordosis (15.3° ± 5.4° vs 9.3° ± 5.8°, p < 0.001) after single-level fusion at L5-S1. The change in disc space height was similar for these 2 groups (p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperlordotic implants provided a greater degree of overall lumbar lordosis restoration as well as L5-S1 segmental and disc space lordosis restoration than lordotic implants. The change in disc space height was similar. Differences in lateral and supine positioning did not affect these parameters.

Emerging Technologies in Spinal Surgery: Ultra-Low Radiation Imaging Platforms.

BACKGROUND: Spine surgery has seen tremendous growth in the past 2 decades. A variety of safety, practical, and market-driven needs have spurred the development of new imaging technologies as necessary tools for modern-day spine surgery. Although current imaging techniques have proven satisfactory for operative needs, it is well-known that these techniques have negative consequences for operators and patients in terms of radiation risk. Several mitigating techniques have arisen in recent years, ranging from lead protection to radiation-reducing protocols, although each technique has limits. A hitherto-problematic barrier has been the fact that efforts to diminish radiation emission come at the cost of reduced image quality. OBJECTIVE: To describe new ultra-low radiation imaging modalities that have the potential to drastically reduce radiation risk and minimize unacceptable adverse effects. METHODS: A literature review was performed of articles and studies that used either of 2 ultra-low radiation imaging modalities, the EOS system (EOS-Imaging S.A., Paris, France) and LessRay (NuVasive, San Diego, CA). RESULTS: Both ultra-low radiation imaging modalities reduce radiation exposure in the preoperative and perioperative settings. EOS provides 3-dimensional reconstructive capability, and LessRay offers intraoperative tools that facilitate spinal localization and proper visual alignment of the spine. CONCLUSION: These novel radiation-reducing technologies diminish patient and surgeon exposure, aid the surgeon in preoperative planning, and streamline intraoperative workflow.

Single-Position Prone Lateral Interbody Fusion Improves Segmental Lordosis in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE: Single-position surgery in prone position is a novel technique for lateral interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation. We performed a radiographic comparison of patients treated for spondylolisthesis using the prone lateral (PL) transpsoas approach versus the traditional dual position (DP) approach (lateral decubitus then prone). METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with spondylolisthesis were treated using the PL approach (n = 15) versus the dual position approach (n = 15). Radiographic factors in the groups were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: The groups were similar for age, sex, body mass index, and implant size, but there were more 15° (vs. 10°) cages inserted in the dual position group. Radiographically the groups had similar baseline spinopelvic parameters, lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis, anterolisthesis, and disc height (P > 0.05). Postoperatively the PL group demonstrated a larger improvement in segmental lordosis (5.1° vs. 2.5°, P = 0.02), but not overall LL (6.3° vs. 3.1°, P = 0.14). Both groups had similar improvements in pelvic tilt, disc height, and spondylolisthesis reduction (P > 0.05). The mean relative distance of the implant from the posterior edge of the vertebral body was greater in the PL group (26% vs. 17%, P < 0.001) indicating a tendency for more anterior cage placement. However, there was no significant correlation between the relative cage position and the increase in segmental lordosis (P = 0.35), so this result alone did not explain the relative increase in lordosis seen. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to our knowledge to demonstrate an improvement in segmental lordosis for patients with single-level spondylolisthesis using the PL approach.