RESUMO
We assessed the performance of GenMark's ePlex® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels for overall agreement of organism identification and resistance mechanism detection with standard microbiologic methods. This study included patients with a positive blood culture from May 2020 to January 2021. The primary outcomes were to assess concordance of ePlex® organism identification with standard identification methods and concordance of ePlex® genotypic resistance mechanism detection with standard phenotypic susceptibility testing. Secondary outcomes included panel specific performance and characterization of antimicrobial stewardship opportunities. The overall identification concordance rate in 1276 positive blood cultures was 98.1%. The overall concordance for the presence of resistance markers was 98.2% and concordance for the absence of resistance markers was 100%. A majority of ePlex® results (69.5%) represented opportunities for potential antimicrobial stewardship intervention. High concordance rates between the ePlex® BCID panels and standard identification and susceptibility methods enable utilization of results to guide rapid antimicrobial optimization.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Hemocultura , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Humanos , Hemocultura/métodos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias/genética , Bactérias/classificação , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , GenótipoRESUMO
Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), cefepime (FEP), or meropenem (MEM) and vancomycin (VAN) are commonly used in combination for sepsis. Studies have shown an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) with TZP and VAN compared to FEP or MEM. VAN guidelines recommend area under the curve (AUC) monitoring over trough (Tr) to minimize the risk of AKI. We investigated the association of AKI and MAKE-30 with the two VAN monitoring strategies when used in combination with TZP or FEP/MEM. Adult patients between 2015 and 2019 with VAN > 72 hours were included. Patients with AKI prior to or within 48 hours of VAN or baseline CrCl of ≤30 mL/min were excluded. Four cohorts were defined: FEP/MEM/Tr, FEP/MEM/AUC, TZP/Tr, and TZP/AUC. A Cox Proportional Hazard Model was used to model AKI as a function of the incidence rate of at-risk days, testing monitoring strategy as a treatment effect modification. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model MAKE-30. Overall incidence of AKI was 18.6%; FEP/MEM/Tr = 115 (14.6%), FEP/MEM/AUC = 52 (14.9%), TZP/Tr = 189 (26%), and TZP/AUC = 96 (17.1%) (P < 0.001). Both drug group [(TZP; P = 0.0085)] and monitoring strategy [(Tr; P = 0.0007)] were highly associated with the development of AKI; however, the effect was not modified with interaction term [(TZP*Tr); 0.085)]. The odds of developing MAKE-30 were not different between any group and FEP/MEM/AUC. The effect of VAN/TZP on the development of AKI was not modified by the VAN monitoring strategy (AUC vs trough). MAKE-30 outcomes were not different among the four cohorts.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Antibacterianos , Cefepima , Meropeném , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam , Vancomicina , Humanos , Vancomicina/efeitos adversos , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Meropeném/administração & dosagem , Meropeném/uso terapêutico , Meropeném/efeitos adversos , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Cefepima/administração & dosagem , Cefepima/uso terapêutico , Cefepima/efeitos adversos , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/efeitos adversos , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/administração & dosagem , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Quimioterapia Combinada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The optimal dosing and monitoring of vancomycin in pediatrics is still unknown but has evolved to emphasize area under the curve over 24 h (AUC0-24) over minimum concentration (Cmin) monitoring. Real-world data supporting the feasibility of two-concentration kinetics with first-order equations for the estimation of vancomycin AUC0-24 in pediatric patients are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To describe the interplay of vancomycin dose, AUC0-24, and Cmin using first-order equations within four pediatric age groups. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzing pediatric patients (<18 years) receiving intravenous vancomycin between 2020 and 2022. Included patients received at least 24 h of intravenous vancomycin with two concentrations obtained within 96 h of therapy initiation. Patients with baseline renal dysfunction were excluded. Patients were divided into four age categories: neonates (≤28 days), infants (29 days to <1 year), children (1-12 years), and adolescents (13-17 years). First-order equations were utilized to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters and AUC0-24. RESULTS: Overall, 219 patients (median age of 6 years [IQR 1-12]) met inclusion criteria. The median vancomycin daily dose was 30 mg/kg in neonates, 70 mg/kg in infants and children, and 52 mg/kg in adolescents. Median Cmin and AUC0-24 values among all age groups were 8.68 mg/L and 505 mg * h/L, respectively. For AUC0-24 values outside of the therapeutic range (400-600 mg * h/L), more values were SUPRAtherapeutic (>600 mg * h/L) than SUBtherapeutic (<400 mg * h/L). The overall trend within our data showed suboptimal correlation between Cmin and AUC0-24. However, 71% of patients with Cmin values of 5-10 mg/L had an AUC0-24 within the therapeutic range of 400-600 mg * h/L, whereas 23 patients (92%) with a SUPRAtherapeutic AUC0-24 had a Cmin value ≥15 mg/L. Approximately 10% of patients experienced acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our data describe the relationship between vancomycin dose, Cmin, and AUC0-24 in pediatric patients. We demonstrated the feasibility of using first-order equations to estimate AUC0-24, using two concentrations obtained at steady state to monitor efficacy and safety in pediatric patients receiving intravenous vancomycin. Our data showed suboptimal correlation between AUC0-24 and Cmin, which indicates that Cmin should not be used as a surrogate marker for a therapeutic AUC0-24 in pediatric patients. In alignment with the 2020 vancomycin consensus guidelines, we suggest utilizing AUC0-24 for efficacy and safety monitoring.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Área Sob a Curva , Vancomicina , Humanos , Vancomicina/farmacocinética , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Administração IntravenosaRESUMO
Objective: Vancomycin therapy is associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Previous studies suggest that area under the curve (AUC) monitoring reduces the risk of AKI, but literature is lacking to support this in patients receiving longer durations of vancomycin therapy. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Method: Patients ≥18 years old, admitted between August 2015 and July 2017 or October 2017 and September 2019, and received at least 14 days of intravenous (IV) vancomycin therapy were included in the study. Our primary outcome was the incidence of AKI between trough monitoring and AUC monitoring groups using Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Secondary outcomes included inpatient mortality, median inpatient length of stay, and median intensive care unit length of stay. Results: Overall, 582 patients were included in the study, with 318 patients included in the trough monitoring group and 264 included in the AUC monitoring group. The median duration of vancomycin therapy was 23 days (interquartile range, 16-39). Patients within the trough monitoring group had a higher incidence of AKI compared to the AUC monitoring group (45.6% vs 28.4%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, logistic regression analysis showed that AUC monitoring was associated with a 54% lower incidence of AKI (OR 0.46, 95% CI [0.31-0.69]). All-cause inpatient mortality was numerically higher in the trough monitoring group (12.9% vs 8.3%, p = 0.078). Conclusions: In patients who received at least 14 days of IV vancomycin therapy, AUC monitoring was associated with a lower incidence of AKI.