Testicular function in a birth cohort of young men.

STUDY QUESTION: By investigating a birth cohort with a high ongoing participation rate to derive an unbiased population, what are the parameters and influences upon testicular function for a population not selected with regard to fertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: While varicocele, cryptorchidism and obesity may impact on human testicular function, most common drug exposures and the presence of epididymal cysts appear to have no or minimal adverse impact. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The majority of previous attempts to develop valid reference populations for spermatogenesis have relied on potentially biased sources such as recruits from infertility clinics, self-selected volunteer sperm donors for research or artificial insemination or once-fertile men seeking vasectomy. It is well known that studies requiring semen analysis have low recruitment rates which consequently question their validity. However, there has been some concern that a surprisingly high proportion of young men may have semen variables that do not meet all the WHO reference range criteria for fertile men, with some studies reporting that up to one half of participants have not meet the reference range for fertile men. Reported median sperm concentrations have ranged from 40 to 60 million sperm/ml. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: The Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) was established in 1989. At 20-22 years of age, members of the cohort were contacted to attend for a general follow-up, with 753 participating out of the 913 contactable men. Of these, 423 men (56% of participants in the 20-22 years cohort study, 46% of contactable men) participated in a testicular function study. Of the 423 men, 404 had a testicular ultrasound, 365 provided at least one semen sample, 287 provided a second semen sample and 384 provided a blood sample. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Testicular ultrasound examinations were performed at King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Perth, for testicular volume and presence of epididymal cysts and varicoceles. Semen samples were provided and analysed by standard semen assessment and a sperm chromatin structural assay (SCSA) at Fertility Specialists of Western Australia, Claremont, Perth. Serum blood samples were provided at the University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth and were analysed for serum luteinizing hormone (LH), follicular stimulating hormone (FSH), inhibin B, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), estradiol, estrone and the primary metabolites of DHT: 5α-androstane-3α,17ß-diol (3α-diol) and 5-α androstane-3-ß-17-beta-diol (3ß-diol). Serum steroids were measured by liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry and LH, FSH and inhibin B were measured by ELISA assays. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Cryptorchidism was associated with a significant reduction in testicular (P = 0.047) and semen (P = 0.027) volume, sperm concentration (P = 0.007) and sperm output (P = 0.003). Varicocele was associated with smaller testis volume (P < 0.001), lower sperm concentration (P = 0.012) and total sperm output (P = 0.030) and lower serum inhibin B levels (P = 0.046). Smoking, alcohol intake, herniorrhaphy, an epididymal cyst, medication and illicit drugs were not associated with any significant semen variables, testicular volume or circulating reproductive hormones. BMI had a significantly negative correlation with semen volume (r = -0.12, P = 0.048), sperm output (r = -0.13, P = 0.02), serum LH (r = -0.16, P = 0.002), inhibin B (r = -0.16, P < 0.001), testosterone (r = -0.23, P < 0.001) and DHT (r = -0.22, P < 0.001) and a positive correlation with 3αD (r = 0.13, P = 0.041) and DHEA (r = 0.11, P = 0.03). Second semen samples compared with the first semen samples in the 287 participants who provided two samples, with no significant bias by Bland-Altman analysis. Testis volume was significantly correlated positively with sperm concentration (r = 0.25, P < 0.001) and sperm output (r = 0.29, P < 0.001) and inhibin B (r = 0.42, P < 0.001), and negatively correlated with serum LH (r = -0.24, P < 0.001) and FSH (r = -0.32, P < 0.001). SCSA was inversely correlated with sperm motility (r = -0.20, P < 0.001) and morphology (r = -0.16, P = 0.005). WHO semen reference criteria were all met by only 52 men (14.4%). Some criteria were not met at first analysis in 15-20% of men, including semen volume (<1.5 ml, 14.8%), total sperm output (<39 million, 18.9%), sperm concentration (<15 million/ml, 17.5%), progressive motility (<32%, 14.4%) and morphologically normal sperm (<4%, 26.4%), while all five WHO criteria were not met in four participants (1.1%). LIMITATIONS AND REASONS FOR CAUTION: This was a large cohort study; however, potential for recruitment bias still exists. Men who did not participate in the testicular evaluation study (n = 282) did not differ from those who did (n = 423) with regard to age, weight, BMI, smoking or circulating reproductive hormones (LH, FSH, inhibin B, T, DHT, E2, E1, DHEA, 3α-diol, 3ß-diol), but were significantly shorter (178 versus 180 cm, P = 0.008) and had lower alcohol consumption (P = 0.019) than those who did participate. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study demonstrated the feasibility of establishing a birth cohort to provide a relatively unbiased insight into population-representative sperm output and function and of investigating its determinants from common exposures. While varicocele, cryptorchidism and obesity may impact on human testicular function, most common drug exposures and the presence of epididymal cysts appear to have little adverse impact, and this study suggests that discrepancies from the WHO reference ranges are expected, due to its derivation from non-population-representative fertile populations.

In vitro maturation is associated with increased early embryo arrest without impairing morphokinetic development of useable embryos progressing to blastocysts.

STUDY QUESTIONS: Does polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) or in vitro maturation (IVM) treatment affect embryo development events and morphokinetic parameters after time-lapse incubation? SUMMARY ANSWER: There was an increase in some abnormal phenotypic events in PCOS-IVM embryos as well as an increase in early arrest of PCOS-IVM and PCOS-ICSI embryos; however, IVM treatment or PCOS status did not alter morphokinetic development of embryos suitable for transfer of vitrification. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: IVM has been less successful than standard IVF in terms of clinical pregnancy, implantation and live birth rates. There is currently no information available about the development of IVM embryos according to time-lapse analysis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: This article represents a prospective case-control study. The study involved 93 participants who underwent 93 treatment cycles. Cycles were completed between January 2013 and July 2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING AND METHODS: Participants were recruited for the study at Fertility Specialists of WA and Fertility Specialists South, Perth, Western Australia. Of the PCOS diagnosed patients, 32 underwent IVM treatment (PCOS-IVM) and 23 had standard ICSI treatment (PCOS-ICSI). There were 38 patients without PCOS who underwent standard ICSI treatment comprising the control group (control-ICSI). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The PCOS-IVM group showed significantly more embryos with multinucleated two cells (P = 0.041), multinucleated four cells (P = 0.001) and uneven two cells (P = 0.033) compared with the control-ICSI group, but not the PCOS-ICSI group. There were no significant differences in the rates of any abnormal events between the PCOS-ICSI and control-ICSI groups. Embryo arrest between Days 2 and 3 was higher in the PCOS-IVM and PCOS-ICSI groups compared with the control-ICSI group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). Embryo arrest from Days 3 to 4 was higher in the PCOS-IVM group compared with both the PCOS-ICSI and control-ICSI groups (P < 0.001). There were no differences in embryo arrest rates across all three groups at the compaction or blastulation stages. Cumulative rates of embryo arrest, from the time to second polar body extrusion (tPB2) to the time to formation of a blastocyst (tB), result in a decreased proportion of useable PCOS-IVM blastocysts compared with the other two treatment groups; however, of the embryos remaining, there was no significant difference in morphokinetic development between the three groups. LIMITATIONS AND REASONS FOR CAUTION: This was a small study using time-lapse analysis of embryo development as the primary end-point. Larger, randomized, clinical trials are required to clarify the implications of time-lapse incubation of IVM embryos and the effects on implantation and ongoing pregnancy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first study to compare the time-lapse analysis of IVM with standard ICSI for patients with and without PCOS. This allows for a more detailed and specific timeline of events from embryos generated using this approach for patients diagnosed with PCOS and shows that embryos generated from IVM have an increased rate of early embryo arrest, however; morphokinetic development is not impaired in embryos that progress to the useable blastocyst stage. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was supported by the Women's and Infant's Research Foundation of Western Australia. R.H. is the Medical Director of Fertility Specialists of Western Australia and a shareholder in Western IVF. He has received educational sponsorship from MSD, Merck-Serono and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. The other authors have no competing interests.

In vitro maturation as an alternative to standard in vitro fertilization for patients diagnosed with polycystic ovaries: a comparative analysis of fresh, frozen and cumulative cycle outcomes.

STUDY QUESTION: Is in vitro maturation (IVM) as successful as standard in vitro fertilization (IVF) for the treatment of patients with polycystic ovaries (PCO) in terms of fresh, frozen and cumulative pregnancy outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER: There was no difference in clinical pregnancy rates in fresh or frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles between the two treatment groups however, the IVM group showed a lower clinical pregnancy rate cumulatively. There was significantly fewer live births resulting from IVM treatment for both fresh and cumulative cycle outcomes however, there was no difference in live birth rates resulting from FETs between IVM and IVF treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: IVM is well recognized as the only treatment option to eliminate completely the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. However, historically IVM has been less successful than standard IVF in terms of clinical pregnancy, implantation and live birth rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, AND DURATION: This paper represents a retrospective case-control study. The study involved 121 participants who underwent 178 treatment cycles. Cycles were completed between March 2007 and December 2012. All fresh cycles and subsequent FET cycles were included in the analysis to calculate cumulative outcomes. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, AND METHODS: All participants were prospectively diagnosed with PCO morphology or polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and underwent either IVM or standard IVF treatment. Their treatment outcomes were analysed with regard to embryological data, and the rate of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth, in addition maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed. Fifty-six patients underwent 80 cycles of IVM treatment and 65 patients underwent 98 cycles of standard IVF treatment. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: For fresh cycles, the differences in the biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy or miscarriage rates between the two treatment groups were not statistically significant. The IVM group showed significantly lower live birth rates in fresh cycles in comparison to standard IVF treatment (18.8 versus 31.0%, P = 0.021). For frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles the differences in biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, live birth or miscarriage rates between the two treatments groups were not statistically significant. The cumulative biochemical pregnancy (67.5 versus 83.7%, P = 0.018), clinical pregnancy (51.3 versus 65.3%, P = 0.021) and live birth rates (41.3 versus 55.1%, P = 0.005) were significantly lower in the IVM group in comparison to the standard IVF treatment group. There was no overall difference in the cumulative miscarriage rates between the two treatment groups. There was no difference between treatment methods with regard to the neonatal outcomes, and the IVM group had a significantly lower rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (0 versus 7.1%, P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This was an observational study and further randomized clinical trials are required to clarify the difference in outcomes between standard IVF and IVM for patients with PCO/PCOS. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first study to compare IVM with standard IVF in PCO/PCOS patients using blastocyst development and single embryo transfer. Furthermore, it is the first study to show the results of fresh, frozen and cumulative treatment cycle outcomes between the two groups. Our results show similar success rates to those reported from other groups, particularly in relation to the incidence of miscarriage in fresh IVM cycles and improved success from FET cycles. Maternal and neonatal outcomes are consistent with the limited literature available. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was supported by the Women's and Infant's Research Foundation of Western Australia. Professor Hart is Medical Director of Fertility Specialists of Western Australia (FSWA) and a shareholder Western IVF. He has received educational sponsorship from MSD, Merck-Serono and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. T.H. is a consultant with FSWA and a shareholder in Western IVF. She has received educational sponsorship from MSD, Merck-Serono and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. The other authors have no competing interests.

Increasing influenza and pneumococcal immunization rates: a randomized controlled study of a senior center-based intervention.

BACKGROUND: Immunizations decrease morbidity from influenza and pneumococcal infections. Immunization levels remain below desired levels despite clinic-based and public education efforts. This paper describes a randomized, controlled trial of a senior center-based program, which used peer-to-peer outreach to increase pneumococcal and influenza immunization rates among an urban senior population. METHODS: Seniors were randomized to intervention or control groups. The intervention group received educational brochures mailed with reply cards to report immunization status, telephone calls from senior volunteers to unimmunized participants, and computerized immunization tracking. Immunization rates were obtained before and after the intervention by self-report. RESULTS: Among participants without prior pneumococcal immunization, the pneumococcal immunization rate among the intervention group (52.0%; 95% CI = 46.6%-57.4%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (30.9%; 95% CI = 26.6%-35.2%) (rate ratio = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.40-2.03). Among those without influenza immunization in the prior year, significantly more (50.0%; 95% CI = 40.0%-60.0%) were immunized against influenza in the intervention group than in the control group (23.0%; 95% CI = 15.2%-33.3%) (rate ratio = 2.17; 95% CI = 1.42-3.31). Among those with influenza immunization in the prior year, the rate ratio was 1.04 (95% CI = 1.01-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention increased both influenza and pneumococcal immunization rates to high levels, suggesting that further progress in increasing adult immunization coverage is possible.