Quantifying alignment bias during the fabrication and fitting of ankle-foot orthoses: A single center study.

BACKGROUND: The sagittal plane alignment of ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) and AFO footwear combinations (AFO-FC) has been shown to influence gait outcomes. As such, clinicians often target a particular alignment during the fabricating and fitting of an AFO to maximize outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does the alignment of an AFO change during the fabrication and fitting process with respect to the intended, benchmark sagittal plane alignment identified by the consulting orthotist? STUDY DESIGN: Prospective METHODS: The assessment of AFO alignment was performed using a convenience sample of 125 custom molded AFOs from 68 individuals fabricated at our center (57 bilateral AFOs, 11 unilateral AFOs). The alignment of each AFO was measured at 5 distinct steps during the fabrication and fitting process using a recently validated method to measure AFO neutral angle using differential inclinometers. RESULTS: Prior to fabrication, the intended, benchmark alignment set by the consulting orthotist was 90 degrees for 92% of AFOs, was between 1 and 7 degrees of dorsiflexion for 7% of AFOs and was 5 degrees of plantarflexion for 1% of AFOs. Repeated measures ANOVA showed that AFO alignment changed between all fabrication and fitting steps. Overall, paired t-tests confirmed that AFO alignment was consistently 2-5 degrees more dorsiflexed than the benchmark alignment. Prior to fitting shoes, 55% of fabricated AFOs measured more than 2 degrees from the benchmark alignment. After fitting shoes, nearly 87% of AFO-FCs were more than 2 degrees from the benchmark alignment. SIGNIFICANCE: The finding of systematic dorsiflexion bias and changes in AFO alignment throughout the fabrication and fitting process indicates the need to improve AFO fabrication precision. The neutral angle measurement methodology - using differential inclinometers - provides a means to improve this precision by enabling orthotists to precisely quantify and make appropriate adjustments to AFO alignment throughout the entire fabrication and fitting process.

Validation of the Gait Outcomes Assessment List questionnaire and caregiver priorities for individuals with cerebral palsy.

AIM: To expand upon previous validation of the Gait Outcomes Assessment List (GOAL) questionnaire in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP), to rank items by importance, and to summarize written-in (free text) goals. METHOD: For this cross-sectional study, the parent-version 5.0 of the GOAL was completed by 310 consecutive caregivers of 310 individuals aged 3 to 25 years with CP (189 males, 121 females; mean [SD] age: 10y [4y 2mo]; Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] levels I-IV) concurrent with a gait analysis. Distribution properties and validity were quantified using questionnaires, kinematics, and oxygen consumption. Items classified as at least 'difficult' to perform and 'very important' to improve were considered caregiver priorities and rank ordered. Free text goals were categorized. Results were summarized for everyone and by GMFCS level. RESULTS: Most scores were normally distributed. Validity was acceptable, with concurrent greater than construct validity. Among all 310 caregivers, fatigue was the highest priority, followed by gait pattern and appearance items. The rank of priorities varied by GMFCS level. Common free text goals included toileting independently as well as improved fine motor and ball sport skills. INTERPRETATION: The GOAL is a valid tool that can help prioritize goals across GMFCS levels I to IV. Identifying the top goals may improve shared decision-making and prioritize research for this sample.

Alternative methods for measuring ankle-foot orthosis alignment in clinical care.

BACKGROUND: Changes in gait due to an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) have been shown to be impacted by the sagittal plane alignment of the AFO, but there is variability in practice and lack of consensus as to how this alignment should be measured. The neutral angle is a measure of AFO alignment that has the potential to be used by various specialties that prescribe, provide, and analyze AFOs. Currently, a lack of validated measurement methods prevents the neutral angle from being used in various clinical settings. Two experimental neutral angle measurement methods are proposed to address this shortcoming: a portable low-cost method for use during AFO fabrication and fitting, and a laboratory-based method for use during dynamic three-dimensional gait analysis (3DGA). RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the concurrent validity of the two experimental neutral angle measurement methods against the gold standard? METHODS: The gold standard neutral angle measurement (NAGOLD) was prospectively collected during a static 3DGA trial for 19 pediatric AFOs from 10 individuals. While NAGOLD was being collected, the neutral angle was simultaneously measured using digital differential inclinometers (NAINCL). Within the same 3DGA session, the neutral angle was also measured during the swing phase of gait (NASWING). The NAINCL and NASWING measurements were compared to NAGOLD using repeated measures ANOVA, ICC, and bootstrapped errors-in-variables regressions. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVA indicated no differences between measurement methods (p = 0.43) and ICC analysis indicated good absolute agreement (ICC(A-1) = 0.85). Mean absolute deviations between the NAINCL and NASWING with NAGOLD measurements were 2.4 ° and 1.9 °, with standard deviations of 2.9 ° and 2.7 °, respectively. Maximum observed differences were less than 7 °. The NAINCL and NASWING methods explained 74 % and 81 % of the variance in NAGOLD, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: The concurrent validity of two new neutral angle measurement methods provides alternative means to assess AFO alignment in the clinic.

Long-term functional outcomes after an external femoral derotation osteotomy in individuals with cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown how a femoral derotation osteotomy (FDO) during childhood affects functional outcomes in adulthood among individuals with bilateral cerebral palsy (CP). RESEARCH QUESTIONS: How do long-term functional outcomes after an FDO compare to matched individuals who did not have an FDO? How do outcomes change over time? METHODS: We queried the gait laboratory database for individuals who underwent an external FDO in childhood and were currently ≥25 years old. Participants returned for a long-term analysis (gait, physical examination, functional tests, imaging, questionnaires). The matched non-FDO group included only individuals in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I-II, yielding three groups (non-FDO I-II, FDO I-II, FDO III-IV). RESULTS: Sixty-one adults (11 non-FDO, 34 FDO I-II, 16 FDO III-IV) returned 13-25 years after baseline (non-FDO) or surgery (FDO). The non-FDO and FDO I-II groups were matched at baseline on most variables, except the FDO group had weaker hip abductors. At long-term, groups were similar on gait variables (median long-term hip rotation [primary outcome], non-FDO: -4°, FDO I-II: -4°, FDO III-IV: -5°), hip abduction test, fear of falling, and most pain measures despite anteversion being 29° greater in the non-FDO group. The FDO I-II group reported more falls than the non-FDO group. All groups improved on hip rotation, foot progression, and hip abductor strength. Speed and step length decreased/tended to decrease for all three groups. Hip abduction moment and gait deviation index did not change. Improvements in the FDO groups were maintained from short- to long-term. SIGNIFICANCE: These results challenge the notion that an FDO is necessary to correct mean stance hip rotation for higher functioning individuals since nearly identical results were achieved by adulthood in the non-FDO I-II group. However, an FDO provides improvement earlier and maintenance from short- to long-term. This should factor into the shared decision-making process.