Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 744, 2024 Sep 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39285383

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most of the worldwide population is overweight and suffers from the resulting musculoskeletal comorbidities such as knee osteoarthritis or back pain. Practice guidelines recommend weight loss interventions for individuals suffering from these conditions. This systematic review investigated whether including a weight loss intervention in the musculoskeletal therapy of these individuals was cost-effective compared to administering the musculoskeletal therapy alone. METHODS: This study followed the PRISMA guidelines to systematically and independently search six databases and select full health economic evaluations published up to May 2024 from health care or societal perspectives according to predefined eligibility criteria. Cost data were standardised to 2023 Belgium Euros. The methodological quality was assessed using two health economic-specific checklists. RESULTS: The searches produced 5'305 references, of which 8 studies were selected for a total of 1'726 participants. The interventions consisted of different exercise plans and nutritional targets. Six values were in the north-eastern; leading to increased quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and higher costs; and two in the south-eastern quadrant of the cost-utility plane; leading to increased QALYs and lower costs. Two studies observed no differences in QALYs. Incremental cost utility ratios (ICUR) ranged from €13'580.10 to €34'412.40 per additional QALY from a healthcare perspective. From a societal perspective, the ICUR was €30'274.84. The included studies fulfilled 86 percent of the criteria in trial-based economic evaluations and 57 percent in model-based economic evaluations. The most common limitations of the studies were related to appropriate cost measures' specifications, research questions, time horizon choices, and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review showed weak but consistent evidence of cost-effectiveness for adding a weight loss intervention to musculoskeletal therapy for individuals with overweight, from either perspective. Further economic evaluations should evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols INPLASY (2022,110,122).


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Obesidade , Sobrepeso , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Obesidade/terapia , Obesidade/economia , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Sobrepeso/terapia , Sobrepeso/economia , Redução de Peso , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/economia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Programas de Redução de Peso/economia , Programas de Redução de Peso/métodos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia por Exercício/economia , Terapia por Exercício/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA