Advantage of whole-mount histopathology in prostate cancer: current applications and future prospects.

BACKGROUND: Whole-mount histopathology (WMH) has been a powerful tool to investigate the characteristics of prostate cancer. However, the latest advancement of WMH was yet under summarization. In this review, we offer a comprehensive exposition of current research utilizing WMH in diagnosing and treating prostate cancer (PCa), and summarize the clinical advantages of WMH and outlines potential on future prospects. METHODS: An extensive PubMed search was conducted until February 26, 2023, with the search term "prostate", "whole-mount", "large format histology", which was limited to the last 4 years. Publications included were restricted to those in English. Other papers were also cited to contribute a better understanding. RESULTS: WMH exhibits an enhanced legibility for pathologists, which improved the efficacy of pathologic examination and provide educational value. It simplifies the histopathological registration with medical images, which serves as a convincing reference standard for imaging indicator investigation and medical image-based artificial intelligence (AI). Additionally, WMH provides comprehensive histopathological information for tumor volume estimation, post-treatment evaluation, and provides direct pathological data for AI readers. It also offers complete spatial context for the location estimation of both intraprostatic and extraprostatic cancerous region. CONCLUSIONS: WMH provides unique benefits in several aspects of clinical diagnosis and treatment of PCa. The utilization of WMH technique facilitates the development and refinement of various clinical technologies. We believe that WMH will play an important role in future clinical applications.

Lysine methyltransferase SMYD2 enhances androgen receptor signaling to modulate CRPC cell resistance to enzalutamide.

Androgen receptors (ARs) play key roles in prostate cancer (PCa) progression and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) resistance to drug therapy. SET and MYND domain containing protein 2 (SMYD2), a lysine methyltransferase, has been reported to promote tumors by transcriptionally methylating important oncogenes or tumor repressor genes. However, the role of SMYD2 in CRPC drug resistance remains unclear. In this study, we found that SMYD2 expression was significantly upregulated in PCa tissues and cell lines. High SMYD2 expression indicated poor CRPC-free survival and overall survival in patients. SMYD2 knockdown dramatically inhibited the proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) potential of 22Rv1 and C4-2 cells. Conversely, ectopic overexpression of SMYD2 promoted these effects in 22Rv1 and C4-2 cells. Mechanistically, SMYD2 methylated and phosphorylated ARs to affect AR ubiquitination and proteasome degradation, which further alters the AR transcriptome in CRPC cells. Importantly, the SMYD2 inhibitor AZ505 had a synergistic therapeutic effect with enzalutamide in CRPC cells and mouse models; however, it could also re-sensitize resistant CRPC cells to enzalutamide. Our findings demonstrated that SMYD2 enhances the methylation and phosphorylation of ARs and affects AR ubiquitination and proteasome degradation to modulate CRPC cell resistance to enzalutamide, indicating that SMYD2 serves as a crucial oncogene in PCa and is an ideal therapeutic target for CRPC.

Prognostic significance of the dynamic changes of systemic inflammatory response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

ABSTRACT Purpose: To elucidate the prognostic value of systemic inflammatory response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who are treated with sunitinib, we evaluated the prognostic role of C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics. This study also compared prognostic models containing CRP kinetics and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) kinetics. Materials and Methods: A consecutive cohort of 94 patients with mRCC who were treated with sunitinib was retrospectively included from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. According to dynamic changes in CRP and the NLR, patients were divided into three groups for analysis of CRP and NLR kinetics. The associations between survival and potential prognostic factors were assessed. The incremental value of prognostication was evaluated. Results: A significant difference (P<0.001) in overall survival (OS) was observed among the three groups of CRP kinetics. The median OS of the non-elevated group was nearly 1.3-fold longer than that of the normalized group (33.0 vs. 26.3 months), and two times longer than that of the non-normalized group (33.0 vs. 14.0 months). Multivariate analysis showed that CRP and NLR kinetics were independent prognostic indicators. The model containing CRP kinetics had a better predictive accuracy than that with NLR kinetics, which was supported by the C-index (0.731 vs. 0.684) and the likelihood ratio χ2 test (79.9% vs. 44.9%). Conclusion: Our study suggests that dynamic changes in CRP can better predict survival in patients with mRCC who are treated with sunitinib. Routine assessment of CRP before and after targeted therapy would help identify patients at risk of a poor outcome.