Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Dual Diagn ; 16(4): 429-437, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32644906

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Rhabdomyolysis is associated with methamphetamine, amphetamine, and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MA) use. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, severity, and risk factors of rhabdomyolysis associated with MA use. Methods: We reviewed patients with an MA-positive toxicology screen with and without diagnosed rhabdomyolysis based on initial creatine kinase (CK) concentration over a period of 6 years. Demographics, vital signs, disposition, diagnoses, and laboratory results were recorded. Results: There were 7,319 patients with an MA-positive toxicology screen, of whom 957 (13%) were screened for rhabdomyolysis and included in the study. The majority were male, White, and middle-aged and smoked tobacco. Psychiatric (34%), neurological (15%), and trauma (13%) were the most common discharge diagnostic groups. The majority (55%) were admitted, and 8% were discharged to an inpatient psychiatric facility. Concomitant substance use included ethanol (10%) and cocaine (8%), and 190 (20%) had rhabdomyolysis with median (interquartile range) CK of 2,610 (1,530-6,212) U/L and range 1,020 to 98,172 U/L. There was significant difference in renal function between the rhabdomyolysis and non-rhabdomyolysis patients. Other differences included gender and troponin I concentration. A higher proportion of patients screening positive for both MA and cocaine use experienced rhabdomyolysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed elevated troponin I, blood urea nitrogen, and/or creatinine concentration and male gender to be significant factors associated with rhabdomyolysis. Conclusions: The frequency of rhabdomyolysis in patients screening positive for MA was 20%. Factors associated with rhabdomyolysis in MA-positive patients included elevated troponin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine concentration, and male gender. Clinicians caring for patients who screen positive for MA should also consider concomitant rhabdomyolysis, especially if renal/cardiac laboratory tests are abnormal and even if there is no history of injury, agitation, or physical restraint.


Assuntos
Metanfetamina , N-Metil-3,4-Metilenodioxianfetamina , Rabdomiólise , Anfetamina , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metanfetamina/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , N-Metil-3,4-Metilenodioxianfetamina/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rabdomiólise/induzido quimicamente , Rabdomiólise/epidemiologia
2.
J Emerg Med ; 59(2): 320-328, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32546441

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) recidivism and the use of amphetamine and associated derivatives such as methamphetamine and MDMA (MAE), are intersecting public health concerns. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the frequency of ED recidivism of patients who use MAE and associated factors. METHODS: The study was a retrospective 6-year electronic medical record review of patients with MAE-positive toxicology screens and single and multiple ED visits in the span of 12 months. RESULTS: There were 7844 ED visits by 5568 MAE-positive patients. Average age was 42 ± 13 years. The majority were male (65%), white (46%), tobacco smokers (55%), and in the psychiatric discharge diagnostic-related group (41%), followed by blunt trauma (20%). Admission rate was 35%, with another 17% transferred to inpatient psychiatric treatment facilities. Occasional (2-5 visits/year), heavy (6-11 visits/year), and super users (≥12 visits/year) altogether accounted for 20% of patients and 43% of visits. Heavy and super users combined represented 2% of patients and 10% of visits, with significant differences for race/ethnicity, health insurance, tobacco smoking, and psychiatric/cardiovascular/trauma discharge diagnostic-related groups. Heavy and super users were less likely to be admitted and more likely to be discharged to an inpatient psychiatric treatment facility. Regression analysis revealed racial/ethnic differences, female gender, and tobacco smoking to be associated with super and heavy use. Heavy users were more likely to have cardiovascular-related discharge diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ED recidivism in patients who use MAE is similar to published ranges for general ED users. Significant differences in demographics, discharge diagnoses, insurance, smoking, and disposition exist between nonfrequent and frequent ED users.


Assuntos
Metanfetamina , N-Metil-3,4-Metilenodioxianfetamina , Reincidência , Adulto , Anfetamina , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metanfetamina/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Addict ; 2017: 4050932, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28913001

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine (MAP) users present to the emergency department (ED) for myriad reasons, including trauma, chest pain, and psychosis. The purpose of this study is to determine how their prevalence, demographics, and resource utilization have changed. METHODS: Retrospective review of MAP patients over 3 months in 2016. Demographics, mode of arrival, presenting complaints, disposition, and concomitant cocaine/ethanol use were compared to a 1996 study at the same ED. RESULTS: 638 MAP-positive patients, 3,013 toxicology screens, and 20,203 ED visits represented an increase in prevalence compared to 1996: 461 MAP-positive patients, 3,102 screens, and 32,156 visits. MAP patients were older compared to the past. Mode of arrival was most frequently by ambulance but at a lower proportion than 1996, as was the proportion of MAP patients with positive cocaine toxicology screens and ethanol coingestion. Admission rate was lower compared to the past, as was discharge to jail. The proportion of MAP patients presenting with blunt trauma was lower compared to the past and higher for chest pain. CONCLUSION: A significant increase in the prevalence of MAP-positive patients was found. Differences in presenting complaints and resource utilization may reflect the shifting demographics of MAP users, as highlighted by an older patient population relative to the past.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA