Review of Recent Literature and Updates in Nonstatin Cholesterol Management.

The guidelines for cholesterol management have been updated over the years from treat-to-target using any drug class to emphasis on statins without treatment targets to a hybrid of the 2 approaches. The most recent guideline updates include newer nonstatin lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction goals, and LDL-C thresholds considering secondary prevention and cardiovascular risk. Although statins have been the mainstay of LLT for years, newer pharmacological agents such as proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitor(s) (PCSK9i) monoclonal antibodies, small interfering RNA PCSK9i, and bempedoic acid to optimize LDL-C levels may be underutilized in clinical practice. To provide an updated review for clinicians, we performed a literature search in PubMed for articles published from January 1, 2000, to August 31, 2023, that included the terms cholesterol, LLT, bempedoic acid, inclisiran, or PCSK9 inhibitor. Studies were selected for inclusion according to relatedness to cholesterol management and outcomes with novel LLT agents. Optimization of statins can improve the lipid profile and contribute to primary and secondary atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention. The newest guidance combines anticipated LDL-C reduction from statins and LDL-C thresholds for primary and secondary prevention. Nonstatin agents such as PCSK9i monoclonal antibodies, small interfering RNA PCSK9i, and bempedoic acid are safe and effective LLTs that can be used in addition to statin therapy for additional LDL-C lowering and prevention of ASCVD. Additionally, these nonstatin agents are reasonable to initiate in patients who have not been able to tolerate statins due to myalgias, rhabdomyolysis, or contraindications. Cost may be a barrier to initiating these agents for patients who are underinsured or uninsured. Clinicians should reference the most up-to-date guidance for LLT for primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD. Additionally, clinicians must diligently continue to optimize statin and nonstatin LLT to improve cardiovascular health outcomes.

Comparing the effects of various ß-blockers on cardiovascular mortality in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is a leading cause of death in breast cancer (BC) patients due to the increased age and treatments. While individual ß-blockers have been investigated to manage CV complications, various ß-blockers have not been compared for their effects on CV death in this population. We aimed to compare CV mortality in older BC patients taking one of the commonly used ß-blockers. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) - Medicare data (2010-2015). Patients of age 66 years or older at BC diagnosis receiving metoprolol, atenolol, or carvedilol monotherapy were included. The competing risk regression model was used to determine the risk of CV mortality in the three ß-blocker groups. The multivariable model was adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for the risk of CV mortality. RESULTS: The study cohort included 6,540 patients of which 55% were metoprolol users, 30% were atenolol users, and 15% were carvedilol users. Metoprolol was associated with a 37% reduced risk of CV mortality (P = 0.03) compared to carvedilol after adjusting for the covariates (HR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.41-0.96). No significant difference in the risk of CV mortality between atenolol and carvedilol users was observed (HR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.44-1.22). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that metoprolol is associated with a reduced risk of CV mortality in BC patients. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and understand the mechanism of action.

Student-led podcasts to enhance literature evaluation skills.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Critical evaluation and understanding of primary literature is essential to pharmacy practice. This project evaluated student confidence and learning outcomes in a critical care elective course where podcasts were used as an active learning assignment for literature evaluation. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Third-year pharmacy students created a 15- to 20-min podcast episode that reviewed a landmark critical care trial. A pre/post survey was used to assess student perceptions of confidence in evaluating primary literature. A standardized rubric was used to assess literature evaluation skills in several domains. FINDINGS: Ninety-two third-year pharmacy students were enrolled in the critical care elective course, and 93% (86 of 92) completed the survey. Student perceptions of their ability to evaluate literature improved for all seven questions, including comfort in interpreting study methodology and applying findings of literature to patient care. Students scored proficient on most components of the standardized rubric, with ability to discuss results and conclusions being the lowest performing domain (78.2% fully proficient). After completing the activity, students felt more confident in interpreting results, applying findings, and orally presenting a journal article to peers. Most students felt the podcast activity helped them strengthen their literature evaluation skills and recommended this activity to a peer. SUMMARY: Third-year pharmacy students reported an improvement in confidence in the interpretation and application of primary literature after creating a podcast episode reviewing a critical care trial. Additional research with creation of podcasts or other audio/visual methods should be studied in the future.