The roles of spatial pattern and size variation in shaping height inequality of plant population.

Game-theoretic models predict that there is an ESS height for the plant population to which all individual plants should converge. To attain this conclusion, the neighborhood factors were assumed to be equal for all the individual plants, and the spatial pattern and size variation of population were left without consideration, which is clearly not right for the scenario of plant competition. We constructed a spatially-explicit, individual-based model to explore the impacts of spatial structure and size variation on individual plant's height and population's height hierarchies under the light competition. The monomorphic equilibrium of height that all the individual plants will converge to only exists for a population growing in a strictly uniform spatial pattern with no size variation. When the spatial pattern of the population is non-uniform or there's size variation among individual plants, the critical heights that individual plants will finally reach are different from each other, and the height inequality at the end of population growth will increase when the population's spatial pattern's degree of deviation from uniform and population's size variation increase. Our results argue strongly for the importance of spatial pattern and neighborhood effects in generating the diversity of population's height growth pattern.

Comparing neutral and trade-off community models in shaping the community biomass-diversity relationship under different disturbance levels.

Among numerous mechanisms shaping the unimodal relationship between diversity and community biomass, the trade-off model of "CRS" theory is the most famous one. However, recent researches indicate that this relationship may also emerge under the neutral model where all species are identical with each other. By using an individual-based spatially-explicit model, we evaluated the underlying mechanisms shaping this curve for both models under different disturbance levels. We found unimodal relationships emerged for both models at low and medium disturbance levels; the richness for the trade-off community was lower than the neutral community for most of the environment severity levels, especially at the benign environment due to the strong competitive exclusions among species. Whereas under high disturbance level, the positive relationships emerged for both models; both communities had similar richness with their curves nearly overlapped with each other, that is, because the high disturbance intensity strongly decreased the competitive exclusions within the trade-off community. Our results indicate that although the underlying mechanisms are totally different, both models will produce the similar relationship between diversity and community biomass under different disturbance levels.