A Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Elderly and Younger Patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and compare these parameters in an elderly group with those in a younger group. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective, single-center observational study included 69 hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from a tertiary hospital in Wuhan, China, between January 14, 2020, and February 26, 2020. Epidemiological, demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, as well as treatments, complications, and outcomes were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between elderly patients (aged ≥60 years) and younger patients (aged <60 years). Patients were followed until March 19, 2020. RESULTS Elderly patients had more complications than younger patients, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; 9/25, 36% vs. 5/44, 11.4%) and cardiac injury (7/25, 28% vs. 1/44, 2.3%), and they were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (6/25, 24% vs. 2/44, 4.5%). As of March 19, 2020, 60/69 (87%) of the patients had been discharged, 6/69 (8.7%) had died, and 3/69 (4.3%) remained in the hospital. Of those who were discharged or died, the median duration of hospitalization was 13.5 days (interquartile range, 10-18 days). CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients with confirmed COVID-19 were more likely to develop ARDS and cardiac injury than younger patients and were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit. In addition to routine monitoring and respiratory support, cardiac monitoring and supportive care should be a focus in elderly patients with COVID-19.

Hepatic portal venous gas with pneumatosis intestinalis secondary to mesenteric ischemia in elderly patients: Two case reports.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) is a rare imaging finding. When HPVG is accompanied with pneumatosis intestinalis (PI), the underlying cause is usually mesenteric ischemia with consequent intestinal necrosis. This combination of clinical conditions is associated with a poor prognosis. In this study, we present the cases of 2 elderly patients with HPVG and PI secondary to mesenteric ischemia. PATIENT CONCERNS: In case 1, a 89-year-old male patient was admitted to intensive care unit with respiratory failure, On the fifth day of admission, he developed a high fever (39.5°C) and abdominal distension. In case 2, a 92-year-old male patient admitted to our intensive care unit and received mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory failure. During the treatment, the patient developed gastrointestinal bleeding. On physical examination, abdominal bulging and tense abdominal walls were detected. Both patients underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography, showed abundant HPVG with PI. DIAGNOSES: The patients were diagnosed as acute mesenteric ischemia, bowel necrosis, septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome based on computed tomography scan, abdominal signs, and laboratory tests. INTERVENTIONS: Fluid resuscitation, high-dose vasopressors, and intravenous antibiotic therapy were given. OUTCOMES: Despite prompt treatment, the condition of both patients rapidly deteriorated, and the patients died shortly thereafter. CONCLUSION: Mesenteric ischemia is a clinical emergency. In patients with risk factors and abdominal signs, the clinical suspicion for this condition should be high. Although rare, both HPVG and PI are important radiological clues that usually indicate the presence of mesenteric ischemia with consequent intestinal necrosis.