Comparison of femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopic astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of correcting myopic astigmatism with femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK). SETTING: The study was conducted at the Ophthalmology Department, Eye and ENT Hospital, Shanghai, China. DESIGN: A retrospective, cross-sectional study. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent small-incision lenticule extraction or LASEK for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative astigmatism values were analyzed. The efficacies of the 2 surgeries to correct astigmatism were compared. RESULTS: A total of 180 right eyes of 180 patients (small-incision lenticule extraction: n = 113, LASEK: n = 67) were included. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in the preoperative astigmatism (small-incision lenticule extraction: 1.16 ± 0.85D, LASEK: 1.16 ± 0.83D, P > .05) or the postoperative astigmatism (small-incision lenticule extraction: 0.35 ± 0.37D; LASEK: 0.31 ± 0.42D, P > .05), determined by manifest refraction. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in surgically induced astigmatism vector (small-incision lenticule extraction: 1.13 ± 0.83D, LASEK: 1.01 ± 0.65D, P > .05). The correction index was higher for the small-incision lenticule extraction group (1.05 ± 0.53) than for the LASEK group (0.95 ± 0.21, P = .045). The postoperative astigmatism was significantly higher for the small-incision lenticule extraction group when the preoperative astigmatism was 1.0 D or less (small-incision lenticule extraction: 0.26 ± 0.30D, LASEK: 0.12 ± 0.20D, P = .007) and lower for the small-incision lenticule extraction group when the preoperative astigmatism was more than 2.0 D (small-incision lenticule extraction: 0.48 ± 0.37D, LASEK: 0.89 ± 0.46D, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: An adjustment of nomograms for correcting low astigmatism (≤1.0 D) by small-incision lenticule extraction is suggested due to the tendency toward overcorrection, whereas a nomogram adjustment for tissue-saving ablation profile is needed for the correction of high astigmatism (>2.0 D) by LASEK due to the tendency toward undercorrection. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Influence of intraocular astigmatism on the correction of myopic astigmatism by femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the origin of astigmatism on the correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism by femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). SETTING: Ophthalmology Department, Eye and ENT Hospital, Shanghai, China. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Small-incision lenticule extraction was performed to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism. Ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) was determined by vector analysis using manifest refraction and Scheimpflug camera imaging of the anterior cornea. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to ORA (high >1.0 diopter [D]; low ≤1.0 D), and procedural efficacy was compared. Patients were examined preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: This study comprised 122 right eyes of 122 patients. No significant difference was found in the preoperative manifest astigmatism (target-induced astigmatism [TIA]) between the low ORA group (n = 67) and high ORA group (n = 55). The mean postoperative manifest astigmatism was higher in the high ORA group at all postoperative timepoints (1 month: t = 2.182, P=.031; 3 months: t = 2.30, P=.023; 6 months: t = 2.193, P=.03). The mean index of success (postoperative astigmatism/TIA) was 0.68 in the high ORA group and 0.34 in the low ORA group 1 month postoperatively (t = 2.531, P=.013); 0.73 and 0.39, respectively, at 3 months (t = 2.689, P=.008); and 0.77 and 0.46, respectively, at 6 months (t = 2.105, P=.037). CONCLUSION: Small-incision lenticule extraction was effective in correcting astigmatism but may be less effective in correcting ORA.