RESUMO
The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 was first reported from Wuhan, China in December 2019. Since then, it has caused global crisis and it still continues to be a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Although it primarily involves respiratory system with symptoms ranging from mild to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, extrapulmonary involvement including gastrointestinal manifestations is increasingly reported. There are few reported cases of acute pancreatitis following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection; however, little is known on true prevalence of acute pancreatitis or other extrapulmonary manifestations. More data and research on pathophysiology and organ-specific extrapulmonary manifestations would aid clinicians to monitor and recognise these wide spectra of manifestations so that organ-specific therapeutic strategies and management pathways could be developed. We report a case of acute pancreatitis in an otherwise asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. He developed acute upper abdominal pain on day 13th of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection detection. Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was made after his serum amylase level was raised by more than five times the normal and the computed tomography abdomen showed oedematous pancreas. He was successfully managed and discharged after 12 days of diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. On follow-up after 1 year, there were no recurrent attacks of pancreatitis. Our case highlights that acute pancreatitis can occur even in asymptomatic and milder form of COVID-19 and the onset of such complications could be delayed. Abdominal pain in COVID-19 should be carefully assessed because prompt diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis in COVID-19 patient is crucial in preventing multi-organ dysfunction leading to subsequent morbidity and mortality.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rabies kills approximately 59,000 people each year worldwide. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of rabies is important for instituting rapid containment measures and for advising the exposed people for postexposure treatment. The application of a rapid diagnostic tests in the field can greatly enhance disease surveillance and diagnostic activities, especially in resource poor settings. In this study, a total of 179 brain tissue samples collected from different rabies suspect animal species (113 dogs, 50 cattle, 10 cats, 3 goats, 2 horses, and 1 bear) were selected and tested using both rapid immunochromatographic kit and the reference standard fluorescent antibody test (FAT). We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of a rapid antigen detection test kit produced by BioNote, Inc. (Hwaseong-si, Korea) relative to a FAT for its fit-for-purpose for confirmation of clinical cases of rabies for early response and enhancing rabies surveillance. RESULTS: Among 179 samples examined in this study, there was a concordance in results by the rapid test and FAT in 115 positive samples and 54 negative samples. Test results were discordant in 10 samples which were positive by FAT, but negative (false negative) by rapid kit. The rapid test kit showed a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 85.9-95.6) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 93.4-100) using FAT as the reference standard. The positive and negative predictive values were found to be 100% (95% CI:96.7-100) and 84.4% (95% CI: 73.6-91.3), respectively. Overall, there was 94.4% (95% CI: 90-96.9) test agreement between rapid test and FAT (Kappa value = 0.874) with a positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement of 92 and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding demonstrated that the rapid test kit (BioNote) can be used for rabies surveillance and confirming clinical case of rabies in animals for making rapid decisions particularly controlling rabies outbreaks in resource poor settings.
