Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Clin Neurosci ; 89: 223-225, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34119271

RESUMO

Chondrosarcoma (CS) is a locally invasive, slow growing malignant neoplasm. Intracranial chondrosarcoma are extradural osseous lesions and intradural location with intratumoral hemorrhage is very rare. We report a rare case of 65-year-old male presenting with a small mass in left posterior skull base and later, suddenly deteriorating due to large cerebellar hemorrhage. A brief review of literature of such cases is also presented.


Assuntos
Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Cerebral/cirurgia , Condrossarcoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Condrossarcoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Base do Crânio/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Base do Crânio/cirurgia , Idoso , Hemorragia Cerebral/etiologia , Condrossarcoma/complicações , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Base do Crânio/diagnóstico por imagem , Base do Crânio/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Base do Crânio/complicações
4.
Neurol India ; 67(Supplement): S47-S52, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30688233

RESUMO

Radiation-induced brachial plexus neuropathy (RIBPN) is an uncommon problem. It is a delayed nontraumatic brachial plexus neuropathy following radiation treatment for carcinomas in the region of neck, axilla, and chest wall. The incidence is more commonly reported following radiation treatment for carcinoma of breast. The neurological features are characterized by severe neurogenic pain with progressive sensory-motor deficits in the affected upper limb. The incidence has increased following improved survival rate of patients with carcinomas of neck, axilla, and chest wall. The diagnosis of RIBPN is often confused with recurrence of the tumor in the neck and axilla. The management options are limited, and external neurolysis of the involved brachial plexus with excision of the perineural scar tissue is recommended in patients with severe clinical manifestations. We review our experience in the management of RIBPN from 2004 to 2017 and highlight the features of the 11 patients with this disorder whom we encountered during this period. The relevant clinical findings, natural history, pathophysiology, radiological characteristics, and various management options are briefly discussed.


Assuntos
Neuropatias do Plexo Braquial/diagnóstico , Neuropatias do Plexo Braquial/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Neurol India ; 67(Supplement): S82-S91, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30688239

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective analysis of surgically treated 354 cases of injection-related iatrogenic peripheral nerve injuries was performed. The purpose of this clinical study was to present our experience in the management of various types of injection-related peripheral nerve injuries and discuss various issues that are associated with this subset of peripheral nerve injuries. METHODS: Over a 17-year period, 354 cases of injection-related iatrogenic peripheral nerve injuries were managed surgically at the Department of Neurosurgery at P.D. Hinduja Hospital and Seth G S Medical College, Mumbai. In our series, the injection-related iatrogenic nerve injuries were following intramuscular injections, brachial nerves block procedures, subclavian and jugular venous cannulation procedures for central line placements, and routine intravenous injections in the peripheral veins of the limbs. The age of the patients ranged from 5 years to 65 years. Pain, paresthesia, and sensory-motor deficits were the common presenting features in our series. The operative procedures performed in our series were external neurolysis and excision of neuroma/contused portion of the nerve and sural nerve cable grafting. The follow-up ranged from 6 months to 84 months. There were no major intraoperative complications in our series. RESULTS: In our series, functional improvement (power grade 3 or above) was noted in 190 (53.7%) patients following surgical intervention. In 164 (46.3%) patients, there was either a non-functional status or no recovery. Neurological deterioration in the form of motor weakness was noted in 9 (2.5%) patients in our series after the surgery. The best results (90.1%) were noted with radial nerve repair following surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Injection-related iatrogenic nerve injuries are not an uncommon problem. Surgery should be the preferred treatment option when the injured nerve fails to recover following the insult. The results are rewarding in a significant percentage of patients following timely intervention. The problem of litigation attached with this type of injury is also highlighted.


Assuntos
Doença Iatrogênica , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA