RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to establish the comparison between mirabegron and antimuscarinic agents through the improvement of the urodynamic study (UDS) parameter among overactive bladder (OAB) populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PRISMA checklist and procedure were utilized to standardize our review of studies from scientific databases published between January 2013 and May 2022 in accordance with the applied eligibility criteria. This study mainly focused on UDS parameter improvement; hence, baseline and follow-up completion were mandatory to be included. The quality of each included study was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool in RevMan 5.4.1. RESULTS: We included a total of 5 clinical trials encompassing 430 clinically confirmed OAB individuals. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the improvement of maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) was more apparent in the mirabegron arm [mean difference (MD), 1.78 (1.31, 2.26); p<0.05] compared to antimuscarinics arm [MD, 0.02 (-2.53, 2.57); p>0.05) as analyzed in random-effect model (REM) analysis within 95% CI. Similar outcomes were also observed on the other UDS parameters related to the bladder's storage function, e.g., post-void residual (PVR) and detrusor overactivity (DO) cases, with most of the MDs favoring mirabegron. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron is superior in improving most of the UDS parameter outcomes compared to the antimuscarinics agents though the current guideline should always refer to symptoms improvement. Emphasizing the role of UDS parameter measurements to objectively confirm a therapeutic effect should be considered in the upcoming studies.
