Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical care in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruption of regular healthcare leading to reduced hospital attendances, repurposing of surgical facilities, and cancellation of cancer screening programmes. This study aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 on surgical care in the Netherlands. METHODS: A nationwide study was conducted in collaboration with the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing. Eight surgical audits were expanded with items regarding alterations in scheduling and treatment plans. Data on procedures performed in 2020 were compared with those from a historical cohort (2018-2019). Endpoints included total numbers of procedures performed and altered treatment plans. Secondary endpoints included complication, readmission, and mortality rates. RESULTS: Some 12 154 procedures were performed in participating hospitals in 2020, representing a decrease of 13.6 per cent compared with 2018-2019. The largest reduction (29.2 per cent) was for non-cancer procedures during the first COVID-19 wave. Surgical treatment was postponed for 9.6 per cent of patients. Alterations in surgical treatment plans were observed in 1.7 per cent. Time from diagnosis to surgery decreased (to 28 days in 2020, from 34 days in 2019 and 36 days in 2018; P < 0.001). For cancer-related procedures, duration of hospital stay decreased (5 versus 6 days; P < 0.001). Audit-specific complications, readmission, and mortality rates were unchanged, but ICU admissions decreased (16.5 versus 16.8 per cent; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The reduction in the number of surgical operations was greatest for those without cancer. Where surgery was undertaken, it appeared to be delivered safely, with similar complication and mortality rates, fewer admissions to ICU, and a shorter hospital stay.

COVID-19 has had a significant impact on healthcare worldwide. Hospital visits were reduced, operating facilities were used for COVID-19 care, and cancer screening programmes were cancelled. This study describes the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Dutch surgical healthcare in 2020. Patterns of care in terms of changed or delayed treatment are described for patients who had surgery in 2020, compared with those who had surgery in 2018­2019. The study found that mainly non-cancer surgical treatments were cancelled during months with high COVID-19 rates. Outcomes for patients undergoing surgery were similar but with fewer ICU admissions and shorter hospital stay. These data provide no insight into the burden endured by patients who had postponed or cancelled operations.

Time interval between rectal cancer resection and reintervention for anastomotic leakage and the impact of a defunctioning stoma: A Dutch population-based study.

AIM: In the Netherlands, a selective policy of faecal diversion after rectal cancer surgery is generally applied. This study aimed to evaluate the timing, type, and short-term outcomes of reoperation for anastomotic leakage after primary rectal cancer resection stratified for a defunctioning stoma. METHOD: Data of all patients who underwent primary rectal cancer surgery with primary anastomosis from 2013-2019 were extracted from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit. Primary outcomes were new stoma construction, mortality, ICU admission, prolonged hospital stay, and readmission. RESULTS: In total, 10,772 rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery with primary anastomosis were included, of whom 46.6% received a primary defunctioning stoma. The reintervention rate for anastomotic leakage was 8.2% and 11.6% for patients with and without a defunctioning stoma (p < 0.001). Reintervention consisted of reoperation in 44.0% and 85.3% (p < 0.001), with a median time interval from primary resection to reoperation of seven days (IQR 4-14) vs. five days (IQR 3-13), respectively. In the presence of a defunctioning stoma, early reoperation (<5 days; n = 47) was associated with significantly more end-colostomy construction (51% vs. 33%) and ICU admission (66% vs. 38%) than late reoperation (≥5 days; n = 127). Without defunctioning stoma, early reoperation (n = 252) was associated with significantly higher mortality (4% vs. 1%), and more ICU admissions (52% vs.34%) than late reoperation (n = 302). CONCLUSIONS: Early reoperations after rectal cancer resection are associated with worse outcomes reflected by a more frequent ICU admission in general, more colostomy construction, and higher mortality in patients with primary defunctioned and nondefunctioned anastomosis.

Predictors of 30-Day Mortality Among Dutch Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery, 2011-2016.

Importance: Quality improvement programs for colorectal cancer surgery have been introduced with benchmarking based on quality indicators, such as mortality. Detailed (pre)operative characteristics may offer relevant information for proper case-mix correction. Objective: To investigate the added value of machine learning to predict quality indicators for colorectal cancer surgery and identify previously unrecognized predictors of 30-day mortality based on a large, nationwide colorectal cancer registry that collected extensive data on comorbidities. Design, Setting, and Participants: All patients who underwent resection for primary colorectal cancer registered in the Dutch ColoRectal Audit between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, were included. Multiple machine learning models (multivariable logistic regression, elastic net regression, support vector machine, random forest, and gradient boosting) were made to predict quality indicators. Model performance was compared with conventionally used scores. Risk factors were identified by logistic regression analyses and Shapley additive explanations (ie, SHAP values). Statistical analysis was performed between March 1 and September 30, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of this cohort study was 30-day mortality. Prediction models were trained on a training set by performing 5-fold cross-validation, and outcomes were measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve on the test set. Machine learning was further used to identify risk factors, measured by odds ratios and SHAP values. Results: This cohort study included 62 501 records, most patients were male (35 116 [56.2%]), were aged 61 to 80 years (41 560 [66.5%]), and had an American Society of Anesthesiology score of II (35 679 [57.1%]). A 30-day mortality rate of 2.7% (n = 1693) was found. The area under the curve of the best machine learning model for 30-day mortality (0.82; 95% CI, 0.79-0.85) was significantly higher than the American Society of Anesthesiology score (0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.77; P < .001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (0.66; 95% CI, 0.63-0.70; P < .001), and preoperative score to predict postoperative mortality (0.73; 95% CI, 0.70-0.77; P < .001). Hypertension, myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma were comorbidities with a high risk for increased mortality. Machine learning identified specific risk factors for a complicated course, intensive care unit admission, prolonged hospital stay, and readmission. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a decreased risk for all adverse outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that machine learning methods outperformed conventional scores to predict 30-day mortality after colorectal cancer surgery, identified specific patient groups at risk for adverse outcomes, and provided directions to optimize benchmarking in clinical audits.

Visceral Fat and Anastomotic Leakage After Colon Cancer Resection.

BACKGROUND: Visceral fat is considered a risk for postoperative complications in colon cancer surgery. However, the association with anastomotic leakage as the most worrisome complication is not clear mainly because of underpowered studies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of visceral fat as a continuous variable on anastomotic leakage in a large cohort of colon cancer resections. DESIGN: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study. SETTINGS: This study used data of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit of the years 2011 through 2014 from 8 Dutch teaching hospitals. Visceral fat was assessed on the routine preoperative abdominal CT scan. PATIENTS: A total of 2370 patients underwent colon cancer resection with primary anastomosis. There were 2011 patients operated electively and 359 in an emergency setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effect of visceral fat on anastomotic leakage after multivariable analysis was measured. RESULTS: Visceral fat was associated with anastomotic leakage in the elective colon resection group (n = 2011) but not in emergency colon resections (n = 359). Significant confounding was found for type of resection, BMI, and sex. The association of male sex and BMI as previously reported risk factors for anastomotic leakage was explained by visceral fat. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective character and missing clinical data of known risk factors for anastomotic leakage, like smoking history and certain medication. CONCLUSIONS: The independent association of visceral fat with anastomotic leakage was confined to the elective colon cancer resection group. The previously reported associations of male sex and BMI with anastomotic leakage were explained by visceral fat. Visceral fat-associated comorbidities did not influence anastomotic leakage, suggesting that its effect on colon anastomotic healing is local rather than systemic. Future risk analysis for anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery should contain visceral fat values and consider subgroup differences. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B396. ADIPOSIDAD VISCERAL Y FUGA ANASTOMTICA EN CASOS DE RESECCIN DE CNCER DE COLON: ANTECEDENTES:La acumulación de grasa visceral se considera como un factor de riesgo en caso de complicaciones postoperatorias de cirugía de cáncer de colon. Sin embargo, la asociación con la fuga anastomótica como la complicación más preocupante no está clara principalmente debido a los estudios de bajo impacto disponibles.OBJETIVO:Analizar el efecto de la adiposidad visceral como una variable contínua sobre la fuga anastomótica en una gran cohorte de resecciones de cáncer de colon.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte multicéntrico retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Se utilizaron los datos de la Auditoría Colorrectal Quirúrgica Holandesa entre los años 2011 y 2014 en 8 hospitales de enseñanza de los Paises bajos. La grasa visceral fué evaluada por medio de la tomografía computada abdominal preoperatoria de rutina.PACIENTES:Un total de 2370 pacientes fueron sometidos a resección de cáncer de colon con anastomosis primaria. 2011 pacientes fueron operados electivamente y 359 en situación de emergencia.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El efecto de la adiposidad visceral en la fuga anastomótica después del análisis multivariable.RESULTADOS:La grasa visceral se asoció con la fuga anastomótica en el grupo de resección electiva de colon (n = 2011) pero no en las resecciones de emergencia (n = 359). Se encontraron factores de confusión significativos para el tipo de resección, el índice de masa corporal y el género. La adiposidad visceral explica la asociación del género masculino y el índice de masa corporal como factores de riesgo reportados previamente en los casos de fugas anastomóticas.LIMITACIONES:Carácter retrospectivo del estudio y la falta de datos clínicos de factores de riesgo conocidos para la fuga anastomótica, como los antecedentes de tabaquismo y el consumo de ciertos medicamentos.CONCLUSIONES:La asociación independiente de la adiposidad visceral con la fuga anastomótica se limitó al grupo de resección electiva por cáncer de colon. Las asociaciones previamente reportadas de género masculino e índice de masa corporal con fuga anastomótica se explicaron por la grasa visceral. Las comorbilidades asociadas a la grasa visceral no influyeron en la fuga anastomótica, lo que sugiere que la cicatrisación anastomótica obedece más a un factor local que a un factor sistémico. Un análisis de riesgos previsibles para fugas anastomóticas en casos de resección de cáncer de colon deben involucrar los valores de la adiposidad visceral y considerar las diferencias entre subgrupos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B396. (Traducción-Dr Xavier Delgadillo).

Laparoscopic Versus Open Colorectal Surgery in the Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare published outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open emergency colorectal surgery, with mortality as primary outcome. Background: In contrast to the elective setting, the value of laparoscopic emergency colorectal surgery remains unclear. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched until January 6, 2021. Only comparative studies were included. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effect model. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used for quality assessment. Results: Overall, 28 observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial were included, comprising 7865 laparoscopy patients and 55,862 open surgery patients. Quality assessment revealed 'good quality' in 16 of 28 observational studies, and low to intermediate risk of bias for the randomized trial. Laparoscopy was associated with significantly lower postoperative mortality compared to open surgery (odds ratio [OR] 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.54). Laparoscopy resulted in significantly less postoperative overall morbidity (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43-0.65), wound infection (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45-0.88), wound dehiscence (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.77), ileus (OR, 0.68; 95% CI 0.51-0.91), pulmonary (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.78) and cardiac complications (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.90), and shorter length of stay. No meta-analyses were performed for long-term outcomes due to scarcity of data. Conclusions: The systematic review and meta-analysis suggest a benefit of laparoscopy for emergency colorectal surgery, with a lower risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity. However, the almost exclusive use of retrospective observational study designs with inherent biases should be taken into account.

Post-hepatectomy liver regeneration in the context of bile acid homeostasis and the gut-liver signaling axis.

BACKGROUND: Liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy (PHx) is a complicated process involving multiple organs and several types of signaling networks. The bile acid-activated metabolic pathways occupy an auxiliary yet important chapter in the entire biochemical story. PHx is characterized by rapid but transient bile acid overload in the liver, which constitutes the first wave of proliferative signaling in the remnant hepatocytes. Bile acids trigger hepatocyte proliferation through activation of several nuclear receptors. Following biliary passage into the intestines, enterocytes reabsorb the bile acids, which results in the activation of farnesoid X receptor (FXR), the consequent excretion of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)19/FGF15, and its release into the enterohepatic circulation. FGF19/FGF15 subsequently binds to its cognate receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) complexed with ß-klotho, on the hepatocyte membrane, which initiates the second wave of proliferative signaling. Because some bile acids are toxic, the remnant hepatocytes must resolve the potentially detrimental state of bile acid excess. Therefore, the hepatocytes orchestrate a bile acid detoxification and elimination response as a protective mechanism in concurrence with the proliferative signaling. The response in part results in the excretion of (biotransformed) bile acids into the canalicular system, causing the bile acids to end up in the intestines. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: Recently, FXR agonists have been shown to promote regeneration via the gut-liver axis. This type of pharmacological intervention may prove beneficial for patients with hepatobiliary tumors undergoing PHx. In light of these developments, the review provides an in-depth account of the pathways that underlie post-PHx liver regeneration in the context of bile acid homeostasis in the liver and the gut-liver signaling axis.