Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Oncol ; 57(10): 1325-1330, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30264635

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For breast cancer patients, radiotherapy increases the risk of cardiac disease. Conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) has demonstrated substantial reduction in cardiac doses as compared to treatment in free breathing. The purpose of this treatment planning study is to investigate if dynamic techniques in combination with DIBH could improve the quality of the treatment plans and further reduce the doses to the heart and other organs at risk for early-stage breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT series in DIBH of 16 patients from a previous study were used. For each patient, treatment plans were generated with the following three techniques: 3D-CRT, tangential intensity-modulated radiotherapy (tIMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy with partial arcs (pVMAT). The treatment planning was performed focusing on planning target volume (PTV) coverage, V95% >95%. Dose-volume histograms were calculated and compared. Doses to the heart, left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, ipsilateral and contralateral lung as well as the contralateral breast (CB) were assessed. RESULTS: All plans fulfilled the criterion on PTV coverage. Compared to 3D-CRT, the dynamic plans obtained better dose homogeneity and conformity. The mean heart dose was similar for 3D-CRT and tIMRT, 1.3 and 1.1 Gy, respectively, but significantly higher for pVMAT, 1.6 Gy. The median V25 Gy to the heart was 0% for all techniques. The LAD doses were generally lower with the dynamic techniques. The mean doses to the ipsi- and contralateral lung and CB were similar with tIMRT and 3D-CRT but significantly higher with pVMAT. V20 Gy to the ipsilateral lung was significantly lower with tIMRT compared to 3D-CRT. CONCLUSION: tIMRT and 3D-CRT with DIBH are better techniques for sparing heart tissue and other organs at risk without compromising target coverage in early-stage breast cancer irradiation compared to VMAT.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Suspensão da Respiração , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Coração/efeitos da radiação , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Órgãos em Risco , Dosagem Radioterapêutica
2.
Acta Oncol ; 50(6): 935-43, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21767194

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: When intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is realised with dynamic multi-leaf collimators (MLC) and given under respiratory motion, dosimetric errors may occur. These errors are a consequence of the dose blurring and the interplay between the organ motion and the leaf motion. In the present study, a model for evaluating these dosimetric effects for patient-specific cases has been developed and tested. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the purpose written software, three dimensional (3D) dose distributions can be calculated both with and without a generated breathing cycle. To validate the presented model and illustrate its application, periodic breathing cycles were generated, where the starting phase was set randomly for each field during the calculations. Respiration in the anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI) and left-right (LR) direction was tested and verified. To illustrate the application of the presented model, two 5-fields IMRT plans with different complexity were calculated with a 2 cm peak-to-peak motion in the AP direction for one fraction and for 25 fractions. RESULTS: The results showed that the calculation method is of good accuracy, in particular for IMRT plans consisting of several fields, where 97% of the pixels within the body fulfilled a tolerance set to 4% dose difference and 4 mm distance to agreement (DTA). For the two IMRT plans with different complexity, pronounced respiratory induced dose errors, which increased with increasing complexity, were found for both one fraction and 25 fractions, but due to the random stating phase the interplay effect was considerably reduced for the plans consisting of 25 fractions. This illustrates how the dosimetric effects will vary depending on the dose plan and on the number of fractions investigated. CONCLUSION: For patient specific cases, the model can with good accuracy calculate 3D dose distributions both with and without respiratory motion, and evaluate the dosimetric effects.


Assuntos
Simulação por Computador , Modelos Biológicos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Respiração , Algoritmos , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Humanos
3.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 71(4): 1034-41, 2008 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18249502

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We present planning and early clinical outcomes of a study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for locally advanced prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 43 patients initially treated with an IMRT plan delivering 50 Gy to the prostate, seminal vesicles, and pelvic lymph nodes, followed by a conformal radiotherapy (CRT) plan delivering 20 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles, were studied. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) data for the added plans were compared with dose-volume histogram data for the sum of two CRT plans for 15 cases. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity, based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scoring system, was recorded weekly throughout treatment as well as 3 to 18 months after treatment and are presented. RESULTS: Treatment with IMRT both reduced normal tissue doses and increased the minimum target doses. Intestine volumes receiving more than 40 and 50 Gy were significantly reduced (e.g., at 50 Gy, from 81 to 19 cm(3); p = 0.026), as were bladder volumes above 40, 50, and 60 Gy, rectum volumes above 30, 50, and 60 Gy, and hip joint muscle volumes above 20, 30, and 40 Gy. During treatment, Grade 2 GI toxicity was reported by 12 of 43 patients (28%), and Grade 2 to 4 GU toxicity was also observed among 12 patients (28%). With 6 to 18 months of follow-up, 2 patients (5%) experienced Grade 2 GI effects and 7 patients (16%) experienced Grade 2 GU effects. CONCLUSIONS: Use of IMRT for pelvic irradiation in prostate cancer reduces normal tissue doses, improves target coverage, and has a promising toxicity profile.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/secundário , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Idoso , Humanos , Linfonodos/efeitos da radiação , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pelve/efeitos da radiação , Projetos Piloto , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA