Intestinal barrier integrity in patients with plaque psoriasis.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory systemic disease. Growing evidence suggests that human homeostasis depends on a mutualistic relationship with gut bacteria that produce a number of biologically active compounds. Therefore, enteric microbiota dysbiosis with gut barrier disruption may be an important factor in the development of chronic inflammatory diseases. The aim of our study was to assess non-invasive markers of intestinal barrier integrity in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Concentrations of claudin-3 (intestinal epithelial tight junction structure) and intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP; marker of enterocyte damage) were determined in the blood of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis (n = 20) and healthy individuals (n = 20) using commercially available enzyme-linked immunoassay test kits. Claudin-3 concentration was higher in patients with psoriasis compared with healthy control (median, 54.07 vs 42.36 ng/mL; P < 0.001). Patients with psoriasis also had elevated concentration of plasma I-FABP (median, 708.8 vs 147.1 pg/mL; P < 0.05). Our results support the hypothesis that dysfunction of the intestinal barrier in psoriasis disturbs the homeostatic equilibrium between the microbiota and immune system. Further studies are needed in order to develop new therapeutic interventions based on modulation of intestinal permeability.

Trichoscopy in Hair Shaft Disorders.

Trichoscopy allows analyzing the structure and size of growing hair shafts in their natural environment in children and adults. The method replaces light microscopy, which requires pulling of multiple hairs for investigation. In monilethrix, trichoscopy shows uniform elliptical nodosities with intermittent constrictions. In trichorrhexis nodosa nodular thickenings along hairs shafts are visible (low magnification) or splitting into numerous small fibers along the hair shaft may be observed (high magnification). In trichorrhexis invaginata (bamboo hair) the hair shaft telescopes into itself at several points along the shaft. Trichoscopy shows small nodules along the shaft. Hairs bend and break in these diseases. Trichoscopy of pili torti shows twists of hair shafts along their long axis. In pili annulati hair shafts with alternating white and dark bands are visible. In woolly hair the examination demonstrates hair shafts with waves at very short intervals. For trichothiodystrophy polarized trichoscopy should be used. In ectodermal dysplasias, trichoscopy shows a variety of hair abnormalities, but the most characteristic finding is hair shaft pigmentation heterogeneity.

Trichoscopy of alopecia areata: An update.

The diagnosis of alopecia areata is usually based on clinical manifestations. However, there are several hair and scalp disorders that share similar clinical features with alopecia areata, such as tinea capitis, trichotillomania or traction alopecia. Trichoscopy as a fast, non-invasive and easy-to-perform technique may help to identify subtle details and establish the correct diagnosis. The aim of this review is to present the spectrum of trichoscopic findings in alopecia areata. A systematic review of the published work was performed by searching the PubMed, Scopus and EBSCO databases, complemented by a thorough hand search of reference lists. Of 427 articles retrieved, 30 studies were eligible for quantitative analysis. The reported features of alopecia areata were: yellow dots (6-100% patients), short vellus hairs (34-100%), black dots (0-84%), broken hairs (0-71%) and exclamation mark hairs (12-71%). Tapered hairs (5-81%) were reported in few studies, but a relatively high frequency of this finding in alopecia areata may indicate their important role in the differential diagnosis of hair loss. Rarely reported features, which include upright regrowing hairs (11-96%), pigtail (circle) hairs (4-61%) and Pohl-Pinkus constrictions (2-10%), may also be helpful in the diagnosis of alopecia areata. There is no pathognomonic trichoscopic marker for alopecia areata and the most common trichoscopic features are not the most specific. Therefore, the diagnosis should be based on the coexistence of several trichoscopic findings, not on the presence of a single feature.