Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Laryngoscope ; 128(5): 1207-1212, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28988445

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine if cochlear implantation has a delayed effect on the middle ear conductive hearing mechanism by measuring laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) of the tympanic membrane (TM) in both implanted and contralateral control ears preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, and then comparing the relative change in LDV outcome measures between implanted and control ears. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Eleven preoperative adult unilateral cochlear implant recipients in previously unoperated ears with normal anatomy and aerated temporal bones were included in this study. The magnitude and phase angle of umbo velocity transfer function in response to air- conduction (AC) stimulus, and the magnitude of umbo velocity in response to bone- conduction (BC) stimulus were measured in the implant ear and the contralateral control ear preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively and compared. RESULTS: No significant changes in the magnitude or phase angle of TM velocity in response to either AC or BC stimulus were observed in the implanted ear relative to the contralateral control ear 3 months following cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: From the results of LDV measurements, it can be said that cochlear implantation has no significant delayed effect on the middle ear conductive mechanism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:1207-1212, 2018.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear , Orelha Média/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Limiar Auditivo/fisiologia , Condução Óssea/fisiologia , Feminino , Testes Auditivos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Int J Audiol ; 55 Suppl 2: S77-87, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27266370

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To review the contemporary surgical issues in paediatric cochlear implantation (CI) based on published evidence. DESIGN: Narrative literature review. RESULTS: Surgical challenges in paediatric CI are discussed, with respect to post meningitic labyrinthitis ossificans; cochlear malformation; cochlear implantation in infants; auditory neuropathy and cochlear nerve deficiency; bilateral cochlear implantation; hearing preservation; otitis media; and device failure. CONCLUSION: Early CI is recommended if bacterial meningitis causes profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). CI in cochleovestibular malformation requires pre-operative imaging to plan surgical technique, choice of electrode, and to anticipate complication. Children with congenital severe to profound SNHL should undergo early bilateral simultaneous implantation, preferably before 12 months of age, except those with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder who should be implanted after one year. Soft surgical technique should be deployed in an attempt to preserve any residual hearing. Otitis media with effusion is not a contraindication to cochlear implantation, but active or recurrent acute otitis media requires resolution of infection with grommet insertion pre-operatively. Device failure in CI recipients requires a stepwise audiological, medical, radiological, and device integrity assessment to determine the need for reimplantation.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/instrumentação , Implantes Cocleares , Transtornos da Audição/cirurgia , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/reabilitação , Fatores Etários , Percepção Auditiva , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implante Coclear/métodos , Audição , Transtornos da Audição/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Audição/fisiopatologia , Transtornos da Audição/psicologia , Humanos , Lactente , Seleção de Pacientes , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Falha de Prótese , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA