Correction to: Prognostic Assessment of Non-functioning Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Neoplasms as a Basis for Risk-Adapted Resection Strategies.

This article contains parts of the doctoral thesis of F. Meyer.

Prognostic Assessment of Non-functioning Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Neoplasms as a Basis for Risk-Adapted Resection Strategies.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to exocrine pancreatic carcinomas, prognosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNEN) are significantly different. The variable growth pattern and associated clinical situation of functioning and non-functioning PNEN demand an individualized surgical approach. However, due to the scarce evidence associated with the rare disease, guidelines lack detailed recommendations for indication and for the required extent of surgical resection. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study from 1990 to 2018, 239 patients with PNEN were identified. Clinical data were collected in the MaDoc database of the University Medical Center Mainz. A total of 155 non-functional PNEN were selected for further analysis. RESULTS: According to the classification of NET by the WHO in 2017, 28.8% (n = 40) of the tumors were G1, 61.9% (n = 86) G2, and 9.4% (n = 13) G3. In 73 patients, hepatic metastases were present. Sixty patients had lymph node metastasis. An R0 resection was achieved in 98 cases, an R1 situation in 10 cases. Five times, a tumor debulking was carried out (R2) and 5 times the operation was aborted without any resection because of the advanced tumor stage. A relapse occurred in 29 patients. Different prognostic factors (grade, tumor size, age) were analyzed. Grade-dependent 10-year overall survival rates were 79.5% (grade 1) and 60.1% (grade 2), respectively. The survival rate of grade 3 patients was limited to 66.7% after 13 months. CONCLUSION: In our study, patients with non-functioning PNEN had a longer overall survival after successful R0 resection. The risk analysis confirmed a Ki-67 cutoff value of 5%, which divided a high- and low-risk group. Patients with a PNEC G3 (Ki-67 index > 50%) had a very poor prognosis.

Surgical Treatment of NEN of Small Bowel: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the small intestine have been noticed more frequently over the past 35 years. They constitute about 25% of all NENs and 29% of all tumors of the small intestine. Due to the predominantly indolent nature and overall good prognosis, the benefit of surgical treatment is still debated. METHODS: In a retrospective study, data of 83 surgically treated patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms of the small intestine, 48 males and 35 females with a median age of 62 years (range 25-86 years) were analyzed. Patient data were documented in the MaDoc database for neuroendocrine tumors of the University Medical Center of Mainz. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Log-Rank tests, censoring patients at the time of last follow-up, were used to compare the overall survival depending on potential prognostic factors (stage, grade, surgical treatment). RESULTS: At the time of diagnoses, the most common clinical symptoms were abdominal pain (n = 31, 37.3%), bowel obstruction (n = 11, 13.3%), bowel perforation and peritonitis (n = 3, 3.6%), gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 9, 10.8%), weight loss (n = 11, 13.3%), and carcinoid syndrome (n = 27, 32.5%). 65 patients (78.3%) had lymph node metastasis and in 58 patients (69.9%) distant metastasis were present. Segmental bowel resection (44) was the most common surgical procedure, followed by right hemi-colectomy (32) and explorative laparotomy (7). In most patients (78.9%), lymphadenectomy (systematic/selective) was performed. The 5-year survival of patients who underwent a systematic or a selective lymphadenectomy differed significantly (82.2 vs. 40.0%). The overall 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 88.2, 80.3, and 71.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Mesenteric lymph node metastases are almost invariably present and have significant impact on patients' prognosis. Systematic lymphadenectomy prevents complications and improves the survival. Early surgical treatment should be the goal in order to prevent complications.

Surgical therapy of neuroendocrine neoplasm with hepatic metastasis: patient selection and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) develop hepatic metastases in 50-95 %. The aims of this study were to evaluate the outcome/prognosis of patients following hepatic surgery and to identify predictive factors for the selection of patient that benefit from hepatic tumor resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study (1990 to 2014), 204 patients with hepatic metastasis of NEN were included. Ninety-four were subjected to various forms of liver resection. According to the overall survival, the influence of several prognostic factors like the Ki-67 index, stage of disease, and resection status was evaluated. RESULTS: The primary tumor was located in the small intestine (n = 73), pancreas (n = 58), colon (n = 26), esophagus or stomach (n = 9) and in 38 patients the primary site was unknown. The Ki-67 index was associated with significant different overall survival. Patients with an R0 resection (n = 38) of their hepatic metastasis had a very good 10-year survival of 90.4 %. Patients in whom an R1 (n = 23) or R2 (n = 33) resection of their hepatic metastasis could be achieved had a 10-year survival of 53.4 and 51.4 %, respectively. The majority of the patients (53.9 %) could not be resected and had a poor 10-year survival rate of 19.4 %. Partial or complete control of endocrine-related symptoms was achieved in all patients with functioning tumors following surgery. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 77.9 and 65.2 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection of hepatic NEN metastases can reduce symptoms and improve the survival in selected patients with a Ki-67 index less than 20 %. The expected outcome has to be compared to the outcome of alternative treatment strategies. An R0 situation should be the aim of hepatic surgery, but also patients with R1 or R2 resection show a good survival benefit.

Resection strategies for neuroendocrine pancreatic neoplasms.

INTRODUCTION: Due to their rarity and lack of prospective trials, the optimal treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) is still debated. Recommendations gathered by retrospective analyses of patient data should be based on the new classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study (1990 to 2012), 127 patients with PNENs were included. Tumor stage and type of resections were analyzed to evaluate successful treatment strategies. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients (62 %) were diagnosed with stage I or II, 48 patients (38 %) with stage III or IV disease; 49.6 % of all PNENs were nonfunctional. Surgical interventions consisted of 50 enucleations, 27 distal resections, and 2 partial duodenopancreatectomies in patients with stage I or II disease. Twenty-eight patients with stage III or IV disease received a distal resection and in 13 patients, a partial duodenopancreatectomy was carried out. Exploration with debulking was performed in seven patients in stages III and IV. Stage-dependent 10-year survival rates were 93.7 (stages I and II, n = 79) and 56.0 % (stages III and IV, n = 48). CONCLUSIONS: PNENs have a good prognosis if they are well-differentiated and resected completely. Organ-preserving resection does not impair the prognosis in selected cases with stage I or II. In case of hepatic metastasis and advanced tumor stage, surgical reduction can reduce symptoms and improve the survival.