Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 36(1): 81-6; discussion 86, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22869386

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is technically challenging and can be limited by lead dislodgement. The Attain Starfix active fixation coronary sinus (CS) lead (model 4195, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was introduced to reduce the rate of lead dislodgement, but the active fixation mechanism presents additional difficulties should these leads require extraction. METHODS: CS lead extraction procedures at our institution from 2003 to 2011 were reviewed. Procedural variables were compared between extraction of the Starfix lead and passive fixation CS leads. Attempts at reimplantation post Starfix lead extraction were examined. RESULTS: Four Starfix CS leads were extracted in four patients during this time period. The mean implant duration was 784 days (range, 392-1,029 days). The indication for extraction was infection in all four cases. Mean total procedure time was 141.5 min (range, 92-205 min). None of the fixation lobes could be retracted in one lead and only the most proximal lobes could be retracted in the remaining three leads. All four leads were removed in their entirety. The excimer laser sheath (Spectranetics Laser Sheath II, Spectranetics Corp., Colorado Springs, CO,USA) was required to remove the lead in all 4 cases (100 %) compared to 25 of 131 (19.1 %) of passive fixation CS lead extractions (mean implant duration, 659 ± 697 days) performed at our institution over the same time period (P < 0.001). In three cases, the laser sheath had to be advanced past the CS ostium to remove the Starfix lead. After extraction, fibrous material which had grown between the lobes of the fixation mechanism was noted in all four cases. No complications occurred. Transvenous CS lead reimplantation was attempted at a median of 7.5 days post extraction in all four patients. The original target branch was occluded in three patients and the main CS in one patient. Reimplantation was successful in another branch of the CS in three of four patients; one underwent minimally invasive epicardial lead placement. CONCLUSIONS: The Starfix active fixation CS lead presents additional procedural complexity and uniform use of excimer laser sheath compared to other CS leads. Reimplantation was not possible in the same venous branch in our experience.


Assuntos
Dispositivos de Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Idoso , Eletrodos Implantados , Desenho de Equipamento , Falha de Equipamento , Humanos , Terapia a Laser , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Flebografia , Reoperação
2.
Heart ; 92(2): 190-5, 2006 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15923278

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess prospectively whether preimplantation B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and C reactive protein (CRP) concentrations predict future appropriate therapies from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary cardiac care centre. METHODS: 345 consecutive patients undergoing first time ICD implantation were prospectively studied. Serum BNP and CRP concentrations were obtained the day before ICD implantation. Patients were followed up with device interrogation to assess for appropriate shocks or antitachycardia pacing. Inappropriate therapies were excluded. Mean (SD) follow up was 13 (5) months. RESULTS: Patients had ischaemic (71%), primary dilated (17%), and valvar or other cardiomyopathies (12%). About half (52%) had ICDs implanted for primary prevention. Sixty three (18%) received appropriate ICD therapies. Serum creatinine, beta blocker, statin, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor usage did not differ between therapy and no therapy groups. By univariate comparison, ejection fraction (p = 0.048), not taking amiodarone (p = 0.033), and BNP concentration (p = 0.0003) were risk factors for ICD therapy. However, by Cox regression multivariate analysis, only BNP above the 50th centile was a significant predictor (hazard ratio 2.19, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 4.71, p = 0.040). Median BNP was 573 ng/l versus 243 ng/l in therapy and no therapy patients, respectively (p = 0.0003). More patients with BNP above the 50th centile (27% v 10%, p = 0.006) received ICD therapies. CONCLUSIONS: A single preimplantation BNP concentration determination is independently predictive of ICD therapies in patients with cardiomyopathies undergoing first time ICD implantation. CRP was not independently predictive of ICD therapies when compared with BNP.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Stroke ; 32(10): 2328-32, 2001 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11588321

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abciximab has been shown to decrease periprocedural ischemic complications after coronary intervention. However, the adjunctive use of abciximab in carotid stenting has not been adequately studied. We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of abciximab in carotid stenting. METHODS: Carotid stenting was performed in 151 consecutive patients determined to be at high surgical risk by a vascular surgeon. Of these, 128 consecutive patients received adjuvant therapy with abciximab (0.25 mg/kg bolus before the lesion was crossed with guidewire and 0.125 micro. kg(-1). min(-1) infusion for 12 hours.). A heparin bolus of 50 U/kg was given, and activated clotting time was maintained between 250 to 300 seconds. All patients received aspirin and thienopyridine. Procedural and 30-day outcomes were compared between the control (n=23) and abciximab (n=128) groups. RESULTS: The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. Procedural events were more frequent in the control group (8%; 1 major stroke and 1 neurological death) compared with the abciximab group (1.6%; 1 minor stroke and 1 retinal infarction; P=0.05). On 30-day follow-up, 1 patient presented with delayed intracranial hemorrhage in the abciximab group. There were no other major bleeding complications. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive use of abciximab for carotid stenting is safe with no increase in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. This adjunctive therapy with potent glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition may help to reduce periprocedural adverse events in patients undergoing carotid stenting.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/cirurgia , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Complexo Glicoproteico GPIIb-IIIa de Plaquetas/antagonistas & inibidores , Stents , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Abciximab , Adjuvantes Farmacêuticos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/efeitos adversos , Hemorragias Intracranianas/etiologia , Masculino , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Stents/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tipo Uroquinase/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...