RESUMO
Purpose: Total package time, or the time from diagnosis to completion of definitive treatment, has been associated with outcomes for a variety of tumor sites, but especially to head and neck (HN) cancer. Patients with HN cancer often undergo a complex diagnosis and treatment process involving multiple disciplines both within and outside of oncology. This complexity can lead to longer package times, and each involved discipline has the responsibility to maintain an efficient and effective process. Strategic intervention to improve package time must involve not only new technology or tools, but also "soft" components such as accountability, motivation, and leadership. This combination is necessary to truly optimize radiation therapy for HN cancer, leading to shorter total package times for these patients. Methods and Materials: Two interventions were strategically executed to improve radiation therapy workflow: upgrade of the treatment planning system and implementation of an automated patient management and accountability system. The radiation therapy-related timelines of 112 patients with HN cancer treated over 2 years were reviewed, and the average time differences were compared between the patient populations before and after the strategic interventions. Results: Purely upgrading the treatment planning system did not show significant improvements, but when combined with the patient management system, significant improvement in radiation-related package time can be noted for every time point. The overall reduction of radiation-related package time was statistically significant at 22.85 days (P = .002). Conclusions: On face value, the patient management system could be credited as responsible for the improvement, but on qualitative analysis, it is noted that the new system is only a tool that can be ignored or underused. Owing to the addition of important "soft" components such as accountability, motivation, and leadership, the patient management system was optimized and implemented in such a manner as to have the desired effect.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: A scar boost following postmastectomy radiation to a total dose of > 50 Gy can be considered in cases of invasive breast cancer with high-risk features including advanced tumor stage, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and positive margins. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a scar boost on 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 140 patients with invasive breast cancer treated with mastectomy and postmastectomy radiation at a single institution between 2007 and 2016. Patients received 50 to 50.4 Gy to the chest wall and the majority of scar boosts were 9 to 10 Gy. LRFS was examined using the Kaplan-Meier method and univariable Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up time of 48 months. Ninety-four (67.1%) patients did receive a scar boost and 46 (32.9%) patients did not. On subset analysis of patients with LVSI or positive margins, 5-year LRFS was 79.3% in patients treated with scar boost compared with 71.1% in patients without a scar boost (P = .537). In patients with T3 or T4 disease, 5-year LRFS was 80.9% in those who received scar boost and 71.6% in patients who did not (P = .967). The use of a scar boost was not associated with a significant improvement in LRFS on Cox regression (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.84; P = .654). CONCLUSION: Use of a scar boost following postmastectomy radiation decreased the absolute percentages of local recurrences in patients with high-risk features; however, this did not translate into a statistically significant benefit.