Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 26(12): 1302-1311, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28994642

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the United States, between one-third and two thirds of postmenopausal women do not begin treatment with a prescription osteoporosis medication after a diagnosis of osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to understand the reasons for this lack of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Online physician and patient surveys were administered in 2013. The physician survey included a chart review of untreated postmenopausal women recently diagnosed with osteoporosis and gathered data on physicians' practices regarding the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. The patient survey was given to untreated postmenopausal women with a recent osteoporosis diagnosis. RESULTS: The physician survey was completed by 224 physicians, who also reviewed 811 patient charts. A total of 165 patients completed the patient survey. In the chart review, physicians reported that 19% of the postmenopausal women they diagnosed with osteoporosis were not prescribed an osteoporosis medication. The patient declined a physician's recommendation for pharmacological treatment in 81% and 52% of cases in the physician and patient surveys, respectively. The most frequent reasons for physicians not recommending treatment were: low calcium and/or vitamin D levels, patients potentially at risk of medication side effects, pre-existing gastrointestinal problems, and polypharmacy. The most frequent reasons for patients deciding against treatment were: concerns about side effects, considering nonprescription options and behavioral modifications, and questioning the potential benefit of taking the medication. CONCLUSIONS: Patients decided against pharmacological treatment of newly diagnosed osteoporosis in at least half of the cases of nontreatment. The principal reasons for not being treated with a prescription medication, given by both physicians and patients, were that there were alternatives and concern about the risks of prescription medications.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 17: 195, 2016 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27139225

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A substantial portion of women diagnosed with osteoporosis (OP) do not initiate pharmacotherapy to reduce fracture risk. In clinical practice, gastrointestinal (GI) events have been linked with OP therapy discontinuation. However, there is limited research examining GI events as barrier to treatment initiation following an OP diagnosis. The objective of this study was to examine the association between gastrointestinal (GI) events and osteoporosis (OP) treatment initiation among post-menopausal women diagnosed with osteoporosis in France. METHODS: A retrospective claims analysis of the Mediplus France database during 1997 to 2010 identified women aged ≥ 55 with an OP diagnosis and without prior OP treatment (first diagnosis date was defined as the index date). GI events were identified during the 1 year pre-index and up to 1 year post-index. OP treatment initiation post-index was identified based on the presence of claims for any bisphosphonate (BIS) or non-BIS OP medication within 1 year post-index. Multivariate models (logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression and discrete choice) adjusted for pre-index patient characteristics were used to assess the association of pre- and post-index GI events with the likelihood of initiating OP treatment, and the type of treatment initiated (BIS vs. non-BIS). RESULTS: A total of 10,292 women (mean age 70.3 years) were identified; only 25% initiated OP treatment. Post-index GI events occurred in 11.5% of patients, and were associated with a 75.7% lower likelihood of initiating OP treatment. Among treated patients, a discrete choice model estimated that patients with post-index GI events were 34.6% less likely to receive BIS vs non-BIS as compared to patients without post-index GI events. CONCLUSION: Among women aged ≥ 55 years with an OP diagnosis, post-index GI events were associated with a lower likelihood of OP treatment initiation.


Assuntos
Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico , Gastroenteropatias/epidemiologia , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Gastroenteropatias/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Bone Rep ; 5: 208-213, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28580388

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) events are common in postmenopausal women treated for osteoporosis. The influence of GI events on treatment initiation and treatment compliance is the subject of ongoing research. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were (i) to determine the association of GI events with receipt of treatment in patients newly diagnosed with osteoporosis, and (ii) among treated patients, to determine the association of GI events with treatment compliance. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of claims data carried out in Germany using the Mediplus database. Data were collected from January 1992 through December 2010. The dual-objective study design required two distinct cohorts. Cohort 1 comprised women aged ≥ 55 with a diagnosis of osteoporosis. GI events were recorded for the 12 month periods before and after the date of diagnosis. Time-varying Cox regression and discrete choice models were used, respectively, to assess the association of post-diagnosis GI events with the initiation of pharmacologic treatment (yes versus no) and the type of treatment initiated (bisphosphonates versus non-bisphosphonates). Cohort 2 comprised women aged ≥ 55 who initiated an oral bisphosphonate (alendronate, ibandronate, or risedronate). GI events were recorded for the 12 month periods before and after the date of bisphosphonate initiation, and a logistic regression model was employed to determine if pre-treatment or post-treatment GI events were associated with patient compliance, defined as a medication possession ratio (MPR) of ≥ 60%, with sensitivity analyses at MPR ≥ 80%. RESULTS: In cohort 1 (N = 18,813), 13.8% of patients had GI events in the pre-diagnosis period, and 14.8% had GI events in the post-diagnosis period. Among the patients with post-diagnosis GI events, 93.2% remained untreated during the post-index year, 6.2% were treated with bisphosphonates, and 0.6% received non-bisphosphonates. The respective percentages in patients without post-diagnosis GI events were 81.3%, 16.7%, and 1.9%. A post-diagnosis GI event decreased the likelihood of receiving any osteoporosis treatment (versus no treatment) by 83% (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.14-0.20) and also decreased the likelihood of receiving a bisphosphonate (versus a non-bisphosphonate) by 39% (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54-0.68). In cohort 2 (N = 6040), 17.1% of patients had GI events in the year before treatment initiation, and 19.1% had GI events in the year after treatment initiation. At 12 months post-treatment initiation, GI events were more frequent in patients with pre-treatment GI events (53.2%) than in those without pre-treatment GI events (12.0%). Post-treatment GI events decreased the likelihood of attaining compliance defined as an MPR ≥ 60% (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97) but not an MPR ≥ 80% (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: In German women newly diagnosed with osteoporosis, GI events decreased the likelihood of receiving treatment and were associated with the choice of treatment. In women initiating oral bisphosphonates, post-treatment GI events were associated with reduced patient compliance.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA