Stress and depression in the context of migration among Haitians in the United States.

Our global communities are becoming increasingly more diverse and interwoven; thus, research that enhances our understanding of the multidimensional relationship between depression and migration among distinct ethnic groups is imperative. This study examined the relationship between migration-related stress and depression and the extent to which that relationship is modified by other factors, through the lens of the stress process model. This cross-sectional pilot study used purposive sampling methods to recruit 76 first-generation Haitian immigrants living in South and West Florida from February 2018-May 2018. Descriptive statistics, bivariate and multiple regressions were utilized to assess associations among migration-related stress (Demands of Immigration Scale), depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CESD), Zanmi Lasante Depression Symptom Inventory (ZLDSI)), and key demographic variables. Findings showed a strong positive correlation between migration-related stress and depression (CESD (ß =.606, 95% CI [.296, .556]) and ZLDSI (ß = .624, 95% CI [.242, .440]). Relative to the standardized coefficient, migration-related stress was the strongest predictor of depression after controlling for other predictors. Presence at the 2010 earthquake was the only significant moderator, showing an amplifying effect between migration-related stress and depression (ZLDSI) for those in Haiti during the 2010 earthquake. Consideration of pre-migration factors and the degree of migration-related stress encountered while adapting to life post-migration is critical because they play a significant role in shaping immigrants' depression realities. Community-based services that incorporate or partner with established immigrants to strengthen support for the most vulnerable immigrants early on after migration could serve to mitigate migration-related stressors and facilitate mental health promotion and prevention.

Effect of Aspiration and Evaluation of Gastric Residuals on Intestinal Inflammation, Bleeding, and Gastrointestinal Peptide Level.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of gastric residual aspiration and evaluation on preterm very low birth weight infants' gastrointestinal function, intestinal inflammation, and gastrointestinal mucosal bleeding. STUDY DESIGN: This single-center, randomized trial compared omission of gastric residuals vs prefeed gastric residuals in 143 infants ≤32 weeks of gestation with a birthweight of ≤1250 g for 6 weeks after birth. Serum levels of gastrin and motilin were collected between 14 and 21 days of life. Stools were collected at 3 and 6 weeks of age and analyzed for calprotectin and S100A12 levels. All stools were tested for occult blood for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Means for gastrin (P = .999) and motilin (P = .694) were similar between groups and there were no statistically significant differences in adjusted means for transformed calprotectin (P = .580), and S100A12 (P = .212). Both calprotectin (P = .003) and S100A12 (P = .002) increased from week 3 to week 6. The mean percentage of stools positive for occult blood (P = .888) were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal function, intestinal inflammation, and gastrointestinal mucosal bleeding were similar whether aspiration and evaluation of gastric residuals were eliminated or not, suggesting routinely evaluating gastric residuals before every feeding may be unnecessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:: NCT01863043.