Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients Have Increased Complication Risks When Undergoing Surgery While Not Meeting Clinical Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines for performing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have not been uniformly adopted in practice because research has suggested that they may foster inequities in surgical access, potentially disadvantaging minority sociodemographic groups. The aim of this study was to assess whether undergoing TJA without meeting clinical guidelines affects complication risk and leads to disparities in postoperative outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the records of 11,611 adult patients who underwent primary TJA from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020, at an academic hospital network. Based on self-reported race and ethnicity, 89.5% of patients were White, 3.5% were Black, 2.9% were Hispanic, 1.3% were Asian, and 2.8% were classified as other. Patients met institutional guidelines for undergoing TJA if they had a hemoglobin A1c of <8.0% and a body mass index of <40 kg/m2 and were not currently smoking. A logistic regression model was utilized to identify factors associated with complications, and a mixed-effects model was utilized to identify factors associated with not meeting guidelines for undergoing TJA. RESULTS: During the study period, 11% (1,274) of the 11,611 adults who underwent primary TJA did not meet clinical guidelines. Compared with the group who met guidelines, the group who did not had higher proportions of Black patients (3.2% versus 6.0%; p < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (2.7% versus 4.6%; p < 0.001). An increased risk of not meeting guidelines at the time of surgery was demonstrated among Black patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.60 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22 to 2.10]; p = 0.001) and patients insured by Medicaid (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.26 to 2.44]; p = 0.001) or Medicare (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.41]; p = 0.007). Patients who did not meet guidelines had a higher risk of reoperation than those who met guidelines (7.7% [98] versus 5.9% [615]; p = 0.017), including a higher risk of infection-related reoperation (3.1% [40] versus 1.4% [147]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients who underwent TJA despite not meeting institutional preoperative criteria had a higher risk of postoperative complications. These patients were more likely to be from racial and ethnic minority groups, to have a lower socioeconomic status, and to have Medicare or Medicaid insurance. These findings underscore the need for surgery-related shared decision-making that is informed by evidence-based guidelines in order to reduce complication burden. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Patients With Hip Fracture Is Not an Indication to Delay Surgical Intervention.

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) treated within 48 hours of last preoperative dose with those with surgical delays >48 hours. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Three academic Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients 65 years of age or older on DOACs before hip fracture treated between 2010 and 2018. Patients were excluded if last DOAC dose was >24 hours before admission, patient suffered from polytrauma, and/or delay to surgery was not attributed to DOAC. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Primary outcome measures were the postoperative complication rate as determined by diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolus, wound breakdown, drainage, or infection. Secondary outcomes included transfusion requirement, perioperative bleeding, length of stay, reoperation rates, readmission rates, and mortality. RESULTS: Two hundred five patients were included in this study, with a mean cohort age of 81.9 years (65-100 years), 64% were (132/205) female, and a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6.4 (2-20). No significant difference was observed among age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or fracture pattern between cohorts (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Seventy-one patients had surgery <48 hours after final preoperative DOAC dose; 134 patients had surgery >48 hours after. No significant difference in complication rate between the 2 cohorts was observed (P = 0.30). Patients with delayed surgical management were more likely to require transfusion (OR 2.39, 95% CI, 1.05-5.44; P = 0.04). Patients with early surgical management had significantly shorter lengths of stay (5.9 vs. 7.6 days, P < 0.005). There was no difference in estimated blood loss, anemia, reoperations, readmissions, 90-day mortality, or 1-year mortality (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric patients with hip fracture who underwent surgical management within 48 hours of their last preoperative DOAC dose required less transfusions and had decreased length of stay, with comparable mortality and complication rates with patients with surgery delayed beyond 48 hours. Providers should consider early intervention in this population rather than adherence to elective procedure guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Optimizing Outcomes after Operative Treatment Bicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures - Time for Innovation?

Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures are technically demanding fractures that have a high complication rate. We sought to review the recent literature with the aim to summarize the development of new classification systems that may enhance the surgeon's understanding of the fracture pattern and injury. We highlight the best methods for infection control and touch on new innovative solutions using 3D printer models and augmented mixed reality to provide potentially personalized solutions for each specific fracture configuration.

Skin Antisepsis before Surgical Fixation of Extremity Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating surgical-site infection have had conflicting results with respect to the use of alcohol solutions containing iodine povacrylex or chlorhexidine gluconate as skin antisepsis before surgery to repair a fractured limb (i.e., an extremity fracture). METHODS: In a cluster-randomized, crossover trial at 25 hospitals in the United States and Canada, we randomly assigned hospitals to use a solution of 0.7% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol (iodine group) or 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine group) as preoperative antisepsis for surgical procedures to repair extremity fractures. Every 2 months, the hospitals alternated interventions. Separate populations of patients with either open or closed fractures were enrolled and included in the analysis. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection, which included superficial incisional infection within 30 days or deep incisional or organ-space infection within 90 days. The secondary outcome was unplanned reoperation for fracture-healing complications. RESULTS: A total of 6785 patients with a closed fracture and 1700 patients with an open fracture were included in the trial. In the closed-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 77 patients (2.4%) in the iodine group and in 108 patients (3.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 1.00; P = 0.049). In the open-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 54 patients (6.5%) in the iodine group and in 60 patients (7.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odd ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.27; P = 0.45). The frequencies of unplanned reoperation, 1-year outcomes, and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with closed extremity fractures, skin antisepsis with iodine povacrylex in alcohol resulted in fewer surgical-site infections than antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol. In patients with open fractures, the results were similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; PREPARE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03523962.).

Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating for Extreme Distal Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes after retrograde intramedullary nailing (rIMN) versus locked plating (LP) of "extreme distal" periprosthetic femur fractures, defined as those that contact or extend distal to the anterior flange. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Eight academic level I trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adult patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures at or distal to the anterior flange (OTA/AO 33B-C[VB1]) treated with rIMN or LP. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The primary outcome was reoperation to promote healing or to treat infection (reoperation for elective removal of symptomatic hardware was excluded from this analysis). Secondary outcomes included nonunion, delayed union, fixation failure, infection, overall reoperation rate, distal femoral alignment, and ambulatory status at final follow-up. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with rIMN or LP. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients treated with rIMN and 224 patients treated with LP were included. The rIMN group had fewer points of fixation in the distal segment (rIMN: 3.5 ± 1.1 vs. LP: 6.0 ± 1.1, P < 0.001) and more patients who were allowed to weight-bear as tolerated immediately postoperatively (rIMN: 45%; LP: 9%, P < 0.01). Reoperation to promote union and/or treat infection was 8% in the rIMN group and 16% in the LP group ( P = 0.122). There were no significant differences in nonunion ( P > 0.999), delayed union ( P = 0.079), fixation failure ( P > 0.999), infection ( P = 0.084), or overall reoperation rate ( P > 0.999). Significantly more patients in the rIMN group were ambulatory without assistive devices at final follow-up (rIMN: 35%, LP: 18%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: rIMN of extreme distal periprosthetic femur fractures has similar complication rates compared with LP, with a possible advantage of earlier return to weight-bearing. Surgeons can consider this treatment strategy in all fractures with stable implants and amenable prosthesis geometry, even extreme distal fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Degree of articular injury as measured by CT cross sectional area is associated with physical function following the treatment of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures.

BACKGROUND: Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures are complex injuries that commonly require surgical repair. Long-term clinical outcome has been associated with discrepancies in leg alignment, instability and condylar width abnormalities. While intuitive, the degree of articular damage at time of injury has not been linked to outcomes in patients with bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. The aim of this study was to quantify percentage of articular surface cross sectional area disruption and assess for correlation between the degree of articular injury and patient reported physical function. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study at two level 1 trauma centers. 57 consecutive patients undergoing surgical repair for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures between 2013 and 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Preoperative CT scans were reviewed, and the percentage of articular surface disruption cross sectional area was calculated. PROMIS® scores were collected from patients at a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS: 57 patients with an average age of 58 ± 14.3 years were included. The average PROMIS® score was 45.5. There was a correlation between percentage of articular surface disruption and total PROMIS® scores (0.4, CI: 0.2-0.5, p = .007) and the physical function of the PROMIS® score (0.4, CI: 0.2-0.6, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Our method for calculating articular surface disruption on CT is a simple, reproducible and accurate method for assessing the degree of articular damage in patients with bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. We found that the percentage of cross-sectional articular surface disruption correlates with patient reported outcomes and physical function.

A longitudinal rat model for assessing postoperative recovery and bone healing following tibial osteotomy and plate fixation.

BACKGROUND: Rodent models are commonly employed to validate preclinical disease models through the evaluation of postoperative behavior and allodynia. Our study investigates the dynamic interplay between pain and functional recovery in the context of traumatic osteotomy and surgical repair. Specifically, we established a rat model of tibial osteotomy, followed by internal fixation using a 5-hole Y-plate with 4 screws, to explore the hypothesis that histological bone healing is closely associated with functional recovery. OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to assess the correlation between bone healing and functional outcomes in a rat model of tibial osteotomy and plate fixation. METHODS: Seventeen male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent a metaphyseal transverse osteotomy of the proximal tibia, simulating a fracture-like injury. The resultant bone defect was meticulously repaired by realigning and stabilizing the bone surfaces with the Y-plate. To comprehensively assess recovery and healing, we performed quantitative and qualitative evaluations at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks post-surgery. Evaluation methods included micro-CT imaging, X-ray analysis, and histological examination to monitor bone defect healing. Concurrently, we employed video recording and gait analysis to evaluate functional recovery, encompassing parameters such as temporal symmetry, hindlimb duty factor imbalance, phase dispersion, and toe spread. RESULTS: Our findings revealed complete healing of the bone defect at 8 weeks, as confirmed by micro-CT and histological assessments. Specifically, micro-CT data showed a decline in fracture volume over time, indicating progressive healing. Histological examination demonstrated the formation of new trabecular bone and the resolution of inflammation. Importantly, specific gait analysis parameters exhibited longitudinal changes consistent with bone healing. Hindlimb duty factor imbalance, hindlimb temporal symmetry, and phase dispersion correlated strongly with the healing process, emphasizing the direct link between bone healing and functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of this tibia osteotomy model underscores the association between bone healing and functional outcomes, emphasizing the feasibility of monitoring postoperative recovery using endpoint measurements. Our overarching objective is to employ this model for assessing the local efficacy of drug delivery devices in ameliorating post-surgical pain and enhancing functional recovery.

Trends in non-operative management of low-energy pelvic fracture: An analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Introduction: Non-operative management is common for low-impact pelvic fractures. In this study, we characterize the epidemiology of those treated nonoperatively following low-energy pelvic fracture, while identifying recent management trends. Methodology: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2011 to 2018 were analyzed. We identified adult patients diagnosed with pelvic fracture based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, excluding fractures of the acetabulum, femur, polytrauma, and open fractures to isolate cases caused by low-impact mechanisms. Codes indicating operative management were excluded. Demographic information and outcomes (length of stay, in-hospital mortality, hospital discharge status) were collected. Sub-analyses were performed to identify trends. Findings: 123,936 eligible patients were identified. The average age was 68.7 years. 70% were female, showing a decline from 75% to 66% over the study period. Pubic bone involvement was observed in 59% of fractures. The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 3.83, corresponding to a 10-year survival rate of 58.5%, which remained relatively stable throughout the study period. 62.4% of patients received treatment at urban teaching hospitals. Average length of hospital stay was 6.3 days. Discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) was the most common outcome, ranging from 62.1% to 65.0% during the study period, while 20.0% of patients were discharged home (18.4%-21.1%). Mean in-hospital mortality was 3.28%, showing no significant change, with higher rates among male patients (5.1%) and patients of Asian descent (3.8%). Conclusion: The majority of patients receiving nonoperative treatment for low-energy pelvic fractures were females in their mid-60s with moderate comorbidity. The study reveals a relatively high in-hospital mortality rate of 3.28%, particularly among male patients and those of Asian descent, indicating the need for increased surveillance for further injury in these groups. Most patients were discharged to a SNF, highlighting the necessity for extended rehabilitation in this population. This persistent trend is noteworthy considering the growing emphasis on the cost of inpatient admissions and advancements in outpatient management of orthopedic injuries.

Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedic Surgery: Can a Large Language Model "Write" a Believable Orthopaedic Journal Article?

ABSTRACT: ➢ Natural language processing with large language models is a subdivision of artificial intelligence (AI) that extracts meaning from text with use of linguistic rules, statistics, and machine learning to generate appropriate text responses. Its utilization in medicine and in the field of orthopaedic surgery is rapidly growing.➢ Large language models can be utilized in generating scientific manuscript texts of a publishable quality; however, they suffer from AI hallucinations, in which untruths or half-truths are stated with misleading confidence. Their use raises considerable concerns regarding the potential for research misconduct and for hallucinations to insert misinformation into the clinical literature.➢ Current editorial processes are insufficient for identifying the involvement of large language models in manuscripts. Academic publishing must adapt to encourage safe use of these tools by establishing clear guidelines for their use, which should be adopted across the orthopaedic literature, and by implementing additional steps in the editorial screening process to identify the use of these tools in submitted manuscripts.

Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Decision-making with regard to the treatment of humeral shaft fractures remains under debate. The cost-effectiveness of these treatment options has yet to be established. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of operative treatment with that of nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: We developed a decision tree for treatment options. Surgical costs included the ambulatory surgical fee, physician fee, anesthesia fee, and, in the sensitivity analysis, lost wages during recovery. We used the Current Procedural Terminology codes from the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery to determine physician fees via the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services database. The anesthesia fee was obtained from the national conversion factor and mean operative time for included procedures. We obtained data on mean wages from the U.S. Bureau of Labor and data on weeks missed from a similar study. We reported functional data via the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores obtained from existing literature. We used rollback analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to determine the cost-effectiveness of each treatment option, presented in dollars per meaningful change in DASH score, utilizing a $50,000 willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. RESULTS: The cost per meaningful change in DASH score for operative treatment was $18,857.97 at the 6-month follow-up and $25,756.36 at the 1-year follow-up, by Monte Carlo simulation. Wage loss-inclusive models revealed values that fall even farther below the WTP threshold, making operative management the more cost-effective treatment option compared with nonoperative treatment in both settings. With an upward variation of the nonoperative union rate to 84.17% in the wage-exclusive model and 89.43% in the wage-inclusive model, nonoperative treatment instead became more cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Operative management was cost-effective at both 6 months and 1 year, compared with nonoperative treatment, in both models. Operative treatment was found to be even more cost-effective with loss of wages considered, suggesting that an earlier return to baseline function and, thus, return to work are important considerations in making operative treatment the more cost-effective option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analysis Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes of fixation of Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures around cemented versus uncemented stems.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of periprosthetic femur fracture (PPFF) in the setting of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is steadily increasing. We seek to address whether there is a difference in outcomes between Vancouver B fracture types managed with ORIF when the original stem was a press-fit stem versus a cemented stem. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study at a level 1 trauma center, we identified 136 patients over 65 years-of-age with Vancouver B-type fractures sustained between 2005 and 2019. Patients were treated by ORIF and had either cemented or press-fit stems prior to their injury. Outcomes were subsidence of the femoral implant, time to full weight bearing, rate of the hip implant revision, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative complications, and the one-year mortality rate. RESULTS: A total of 103 (75.7%) press-fit and 33 (24.3%) cemented patients were reviewed. Patient baseline characteristics, Vancouver fracture sub-types, and implant characteristics were not found to be significantly different between groups. The difference in subsidence rates, postoperative complications, and time to weight bearing were not significantly different between groups. EBL and one-year mortality rate were significantly higher in the cemented group. CONCLUSIONS: In geriatric patients with Vancouver B type periprosthetic fractures managed with ORIF, patients with an originally press fit stem may have lower mortality, lower estimated blood loss, and similar subsidence and hospital length of stays when compared to those with a cemented stem.

Study Quality and Patient Inclusion in Geriatric Orthopaedic Trauma Research: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of evidence published in geriatric traumatology, to investigate how many studies include patients with cognitive impairment, and to investigate which methods are used to determine cognitive impairment. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted in PubMed for all publications in English in 154 selected journals between 01/01/2017 and 01/01/2020. STUDY SELECTION: Clinical studies investigating patients 65 years of age and older with fractures in the appendicular skeleton or pelvis were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers performed full-text screening and data extraction for all articles. DATA SYNTHESIS: A comparative analysis was performed for prospective cohort studies and RCTs. The results are discussed in a narrative review. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 2711 publications were screened for eligibility, and after exclusion, a total of 723 articles were included. There is a focus on retrospective studies investigating mortality and complications. Studies are often small in sample size, and there are relatively few prospective studies, RCT studies, patient-reported outcomes, and quality of life. Patients with cognitive impairment are selectively excluded from clinical studies, and no consensus exists on how cognitive impairment is diagnosed. This review identified pitfalls and provides recommendations to navigate these issues for future studies. Many studies exclude cognitively impaired patients, which may result in selection bias and inability to extrapolate results. The lack of use of objective measures to define cognitive impairment and lack appropriate outcome measures for the cognitively impaired is an important issue that needs to be addressed in future research.

Outcomes of associated both-column acetabular fractures with and without a posterior wall fracture- A retrospective observational cohort study.

Aims & objectives: Our study sought to determine if posterior wall (PW) involvement in associated both-column acetabular fractures (ABCAFs) is associated with different clinical outcomes, primarily rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), in comparison to ABCAFs with no PW involvement. Materials & methods: This retrospective observational cohort study was performed at two academic Level 1 trauma centers. Two study groups were identified. The first study group consisted of 18 patients who sustained an ABCAF with PW involvement (+PW). The second study group consisted of 26 patients who sustained an ABCAF with no PW involvement (-PW). All patients achieved a minimum 12-months of follow-up and/or received a THA conversion procedure at a time remote to their index open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) procedure. The primary outcome of this study was subsequent conversion to THA on the injured hip. The secondary outcome was the presence of post-operative pain at ≥6 months and/or complications. Results: No difference in rate of conversion to THA between + PW (n = 4, 22.2%) and -PW (n = 3, 11.5%) groups was demonstrated (p = 0.419). Similarly, no differences were seen between groups regarding complication rate (p = 0.814) and post-operative pain (p = 0.142). Conclusion: Involvement of the PW does not appear to create worse clinical outcomes in comparison to no involvement in ABCAFs particularly as it relates to ipsilateral joint replacement.

Impact of Age on Functional Outcome After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Performed for Proximal Humerus Fractures or Their Sequelae.

Background: The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to treat displaced, unstable 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) has traditionally been reserved for patients over 70 years old. However, recent data suggest that nearly one-third of all patients treated with RSA for PHF are between 55-69 years old. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes for patients younger than 70 versus patients older than 70 years of age treated with RSA for a PHF or fracture sequelae. Methods: All patients who underwent primary RSA for acute PHF or fracture sequelae (nonunion, malunion) between 2004 and 2016 were identified. A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing outcomes for patients younger than 70 versus older than 70. Bivariate and survival analyses were performed to evaluate for survival complications, functional outcomes, and implant survival differences. Results: A total of 115 patients were identified, including 39 patients in the young group and 76 cases in the older group. In addition, 40 patients (43.5%) returned functional outcomes surveys at an average of 5.51 years (average age range: 3.04-11.0 years). There were no significant differences in complications, reoperation, implant survival, range of motion, DASH (27.9 vs 23.8, P=0.46), PROMIS (43.3 vs 43.6, P=0.93), or EQ5D (0.75 vs 0.80, P=0.36) scores between the two age cohorts. Conclusion: At a minimum of 3 years after RSA for a complex PHF or fracture sequelae, we found no significant difference in complications, reoperation rates, or functional outcomes between younger patients with an average age of 64 years and older patients with an average age of 78 years. To our knowledge, this is the first study to specifically examine the impact of age on outcome after RSA for the treatment of a proximal humerus fracture. These findings indicate that functional outcomes are acceptable to patients younger than 70 in the short term, but more studies are needed. Patients should be counseled that the long-term durability of RSA performed for fractures in young, active patients remains unknown.

Clinic follow-up of orthopaedic trauma patients during and after the post-surgical global period: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Insurance status is important as medical expenses may decrease the likelihood of follow-up after musculoskeletal trauma, especially for low-income populations. However, it is unknown what insurance factors are associated with follow-up care. In this study, we assessed the association between insurance plan benefits, the end of the post-surgical global period, and follow-up after musculoskeletal injury. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 394 patients with isolated extremity fractures who were treated at three level-I trauma centers over four months in 2018. Paired t-tests were utilized to assess the likelihood of follow-up in relation to the 90-day post-surgical global period. Regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with the likelihood of follow-up. Supervised machine learning algorithms were used to develop predictive models of follow-up after the post-surgical global period. RESULTS: Our final analysis included 328 patients. Likelihood of follow-up did not significantly change while within the post-surgical global period. When comparing follow-up within and outside of the post-surgical global period, there was a 20.1% decrease in follow-up between the 6-weeks and 6-month time points (68.3% versus 48.2%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Medicaid insurance compared to Medicare (OR 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.09, 0.84], p = 0.02) was a predictor of decreased likelihood of follow-up at 6-months post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a statistically significant decrease in follow-up for orthopaedic trauma patients after the post-surgical global period, particularly for patients with Medicaid or Private insurance.

Use of a Six-Item Modified Frailty Index to Predict 30-day Adverse Events, Readmission, and Mortality in Older Patients Undergoing Surgical Fixation of Lower Extremity, Pelvic, and Acetabular Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: This is a retrospective study evaluating the use of a new six-item modified frailty index (MF-6) to predict short-term outcomes of patients receiving surgery for lower extremity fractures. METHODS: Patients older than 65 years undergoing open reduction and internal fixation for lower extremity, pelvic, and acetabulum fractures were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The MF-6 was calculated by assigning one point for each of six common conditions. Multivariable analysis was used to compare patients with an MF-6 of <3 and ≥3. Outcome measures included complications, mortality, readmission, revision surgery, and length of stay. An area under the curve receiver operator analysis was conducted to compare the MF-6 with MF-5, an existing five-item frailty index. RESULTS: Nine thousand four hundred sixty-three patients were included. Patients with an MF-6 of ≥3 were at markedly higher risk of discharge destination other than home (Exp[B] = 2.09), mortality (Exp[B] = 2.48), major adverse events (Exp[B] = 2.16), and readmission (Exp[B] = 1.82). Receiver-operating curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.65 for mortality, 0.62 for major adverse events, and 0.62 for discharge destination other than home, all of which outperformed the MF-5. DISCUSSION: The MF-6 was correlated with a 30-day postoperative incidence of infectious complications, readmission, and discharge destination. MF-6 scores can be used to risk-stratify patient populations as shifts to value-based care continue to develop.

Severe Obesity Worsens 30-Day Surgical Outcomes and Projected Costs in Operative Femoral Shaft and Tibial Shaft Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of severe obesity on 30-day adverse event rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and projected costs after operative fixation of tibia and femur fractures. METHODS: An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database from 2012 to 2019 of isolated femoral shaft and tibial shaft fracture fixation cases was conducted. Adverse events, LOS, readmission rates, and operative time were queried for severe obesity, defined as body mass index greater than 40, compared with other patients. Student t tests were used to assess continuous variables. Fisher exact test and odds ratios were used for categorical variables. A cost-analysis was also performed to quantify the effect of severe obesity on projected health care expenditures. RESULTS: A total of 10,436 patients were included with 7.0% of patients categorized as severely obese. Severely obese patients had higher infectious complication rates (9.0% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.013, OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04-1.78), readmission rates (7.9% vs. 5.6%, P-value = 0.008, OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.08-1.91), longer LOS (5.8 days SD ±10.2 vs. 5.0 days SD ±7.9 days, P-value = 0.008), and longer operative times (mean 115 minutes ± 56 minutes SD vs. 103 minutes SD ±54 minutes, P-value = <0.001). Severe obesity resulted in an estimated $4258.07 additional health care expenditures per patient compared with nonobese patients. This amounted to a projected added total expenditure of $3.09 million USD in the overall cohort. CONCLUSION: Severe obesity is associated with significantly worse 30-day outcomes and higher readmission rates for patients undergoing operative fixation of tibial shaft and femoral shaft fractures. Health policy considerations should be made to incentivize care for this patient population, particularly in trauma where modification of risk factors before surgery is often not feasible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Complications and timing of soft tissue coverage after complete articular, open tibial plateau fractures.

PURPOSE: Complete articular tibial plateau fractures are typically high-energy injuries associated with significant soft tissue trauma. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of wound complications and need for soft tissue coverage after open, complete articular tibial plateau fractures. The secondary aim was to study the effect of timing of fixation and timing of flap coverage on deep infection rates in these injuries. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients > 18 years undergoing ORIF of a Bicondylar Tibial Plateau (BTP) fracture between 2001 and 2018. Surgical data were recorded for open fractures including number of debridements, timing of definitive ORIF and soft tissue coverage relative to injury. Primary outcomes included rates of deep infection and unplanned reoperation. RESULTS: 508 AO/OTA 41C BTP fractures were identified, with 51 open fractures included in 50 patients with a mean (SD) age 45.7 (12.3) years and a mean (SD) follow up of 4.3 (3.8) years. There were 20 cases of deep infection, unplanned reoperation occurred in 26 cases. The majority of cases (28 fractures) had initial external fixation placed, while 24 had ORIF at the initial debridement. Twelve patients had a planned flap for definitive closure on average of 6.4 days (SD 3.9) after injury, 14 required a flap for wound complications. Among patients with IIB and C injuries, rates of deep infection (5/6 vs 1/6, p = 0.02) and reoperation (5/7 vs 2/6, p = 0.08) were higher in patients treated with flap coverage >7 days from injury compared to early flap coverage. There were no differences in complication rates between early (<24hrs) and delayed fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Complete articular, open tibial plateau fractures are associated with high rates of complications. Time to flap coverage of seven days or more was a significant predictor of deep infection and unplanned reoperation in this cohort. Patients should be counseled about the high rate of unplanned reoperation and definitive soft tissue coverage should be accomplished within a week of injury whenever possible.

Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular fractures in the USA from 2007 to 2014.

Incidence of pelvic and acetabular fracture is increasing in Europe. From 2007 to 2014 in the USA, this study found an age-adjusted incidence of 198 and 40 fractures/100,000/year, respectively, much higher than what has been described before. Incidence remained steady over that period and only a small increase in incidence of pelvic fracture in men was identified. PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of pelvic ring and acetabular fractures in the USA over the period 2007-2014 and to examine trends over time. METHODS: Retrospective population-based observational study using data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), a 20% stratified all-payer sample of US hospital-based emergency departments (EDs). All patients seen in the ED and diagnosed with pelvic/acetabular fracture from 2007 to 2014 were included. The primary outcome was age-adjusted incidence of pelvic and acetabular fractures per 100,000 persons/years. Secondary outcomes included incidence stratified by age and sex, patient- and hospital-related characteristics, and ED procedures. Tests for linear trends were used to determine if there were statistically significant differences by sex and age groups over time. RESULTS: The age-adjusted incidence of pelvic fracture was 198 fractures/100,000/year, 323 in women and 114 in men. The age-adjusted incidence of acetabular fracture was 40 fractures/100,000/year, 36 in women and 51 in men. A small increase in the age-adjusted incidence of pelvic fracture in men was the only significant trend observed during the study time (p = 0.03). Over that period, the mean age of patients at presentation increased, as well as their number of comorbidities and associated fragility fractures, and they were more often sent home or to nursing facilities. CONCLUSIONS: When considering all patients coming to the ED, not only those admitted to the hospital, adjusted incidence of pelvic and acetabular fracture is much higher than what has been described before. Contrarily to the global increase seen in other countries, incidence of pelvic and acetabular fractures dropped in the USA from 2007 to 2014 and only a small increase in age-adjusted incidence of pelvic fracture in men was identified.

Interfacility Transfer Patients With Pelvic, Acetabular, and Lower Extremity Fractures Are at Higher Risk for Major Complications and Readmissions.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the adverse event profile and patient comorbidity profile of lower extremity orthopaedic trauma patients admitted via interfacility transfer (IT) to direct admission (DA) patients from home. METHODS: A total of 39,497 patients from 2012 to 2019 were identified in the American College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. DA patients were compared with IT patients for differences in preoperative comorbidities, adverse events, length of stay, and readmissions in the 30-day postoperative period. Student t tests were used to assess continuous variables. Pearson χ 2 test and odds ratios (ORs) were used for categorical variables. RESULTS: The IT group comprised 7167 patients, and the DA group comprised 32,330 patients. IT patients were on average older (65.5 vs. 58.8 years, P < 0.01), more likely to be American Society of Anesthesiologists Status >2 ( P < 0.01), and had a worse comorbidity profile for numerous preoperative risk factors. IT patients had significantly higher rates of mortality [3.3% vs. 1.4%; odds ratio (OR) 2.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96-2.77], major complications (10.2% vs. 6.1%; OR 1.74; 95% CI, 1.60-1.91), significantly higher readmission rates (5.8% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.01, OR 1.22 95% CI, 1.09-1.36), and more infectious complications (7% vs. 4.7%; OR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.38-1.71) than DA patients. Transfer remained a significant factor predicting major adverse events in regression analysis controlling for patient characteristics and fracture type ( P < 0.01; B 1.197; 95% CI, 1.09-1.32). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that IT patients undergoing operative management of pelvic, acetabular, and lower extremity fractures are at a significantly increased risk of major complications, readmission, and have a higher morbidity burden than DA patients. As healthcare transitions to value-based care and bundled payments, hospitals that accept a high volume of ITs will face exposure to added risk and financial penalties without adequate policy protections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.