Mobility Rates After Lower-Limb Amputation for Patients Treated with Physician-Led Collaborative Care Model.

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes after major lower-limb amputation have been historically poor. The current care provided to most amputees is often disorganized and without physician supervision. The primary purpose of this study is to examine rates of postamputation mobility achieved with a prosthesis by patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and/or diabetes who required major lower-limb amputation and were treated under an established physician-led collaborative care pathway. The secondary purpose is to describe the structure and utilization of the care pathway by multiple independent vascular surgery practices in the United States to enable future exploration of its impact on key clinical outcomes within this patient population. METHODS: Clinical records of 2,475 patients from 6 vascular practices that adopted this collaborative care pathway between 2017 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Only records with sufficient documented histories of amputation surgeries, prosthetic services, and mobility status were included. RESULTS: Of 2,475 patient records reviewed, 1,787 patients (2,157 major amputations) were eligible for analysis. Sixty-two-point 2 percent (n = 1,111) of patients achieved mobility with the collaborative care pathway. Mobility rate varied by amputation level in the study. Prosthetic mobility was achieved in 73.5% of transtibial amputations, 40.4% of transfemoral amputations, and 35.7% of through-knee amputations, regardless of patient laterality, which is superior or equivalent to the best published rates of mobility. CONCLUSIONS: The study describes the structure and utilization of a physician-led collaborative care pathway for treating patients who require lower-limb amputation that meets 5 of the 7 recommendations from the 2019 Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia. Internal data analysis results suggest that patients treated via this care pathway can potentially achieve improved mobility rates with a prosthesis following amputation. This collaborative care pathway should be further evaluated for its ability to directly improve mobility and other clinically relevant amputation outcomes.

Application of a Simulation-Based Interprofessional Teamwork Assessment Tool (SITAT) to Individual Student Performance in a Team-Based Simulation.

There are a very limited number of instruments to assess individual performance in simulation-based interprofessional education (IPE). The purpose of this study was to apply the Simulation-Based Interprofessional Teamwork Assessment Tool (SITAT) to the individualized assessment of medicine, pharmacy, and nursing students (N = 94) in a team-based IPE simulation, as well as to explore potential differences between disciplines, and calculate reliability estimates for utilization of the tool. Results of an analysis of variance provided evidence that there was no statistically significant difference among professions on overall competency (F(2, 91) = 0.756, P = .472). The competency reports for nursing (M = 3.06, SD = 0.45), medicine (M = 3.19, SD = 0.42), and pharmacy (M = 3.08, SD = 0.49) students were comparable across professions. Cronbach's alpha provided a reliability estimate of the tool, with evidence of high internal consistency (α = .92). The interrater reliability of the SITAT was also investigated. There was moderate absolute agreement across the 3 faculty raters using the 2-way mixed model design and "average" unit (kappa = 0.536, P = .000, 95% CI [0.34, 0.68]). The novel SITAT demonstrates internal consistency and interrater reliability when used for evaluation of individual performance during IPE simulation. The SITAT provides value in the education and evaluation of individual students engaged in IPE curriculum.

Inter-Rater Reliability of Web-Based Calibrated Peer Review within a Pharmacy Curriculum.

Objective. To assess the inter-rater reliability of student evaluations submitted through a web-based calibrated peer review system versus faculty evaluations in a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum. Methods. Two calibrated peer review assignments were integrated into two sequential pharmacotherapy-based courses in the first professional year of the PharmD curriculum. To assess the inter-rater reliability of student peer and self-evaluations compared to faculty evaluations, 50 student submissions from each assignment were randomly selected for faculty evaluation, using the same evaluation criteria used by students. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the difference between the scores given by students versus faculty members and the correlation between the combined and individual assignment scores given by students versus faculty members. Results. Mean faculty scores did not significantly differ from student peer or self-evaluation scores. When the assignments were combined, there was a significant fair correlation between scores assigned by peers and those assigned by faculty members, and between scores assigned by students (self-evaluation) and faculty members. For individual assignments, one showed significant positive correlations for both peer and self-assessment compared to faculty, while the other assignment did not. Conclusion. Incorporating longitudinal calibrated peer review activities into the PharmD curriculum demonstrated fair inter-rater reliability between scores assigned by pharmacy student and faculty members. Further research on calibrated peer review is needed in pharmacy education to evaluate its reliability and utility. However, the current study suggests that the use of a web-based calibrated peer review system within a pharmacy curriculum could provide additional opportunities for critical evaluation and student self-assessment, as well as encourage more open-ended communication activities without increasing the grading burden on faculty members.

Self-Reported Medication Adherence Barriers Among Ambulatory Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequencies of barriers to medication adherence reported by ambulatory older adults with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and ambulatory older adults with normal cognition. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Outpatient clinics within a safety-net health care system. PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory older adults (≥ 65 yrs) with a diagnosis of MCI (96 participants) or normal cognition (104 participants). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Self-reported beliefs and barriers to medication nonadherence were assessed by items from the Morisky Medication Adherence Survey, the Adherence Estimator, and barriers derived from a systematic review of studies in older adults with cognitive impairment. Participants with a diagnosis of MCI had a mean age of 72 years, 77% were female, and 37% were African-American. Participants with normal cognition had a mean age of 76 years, 79% were female, and 47% were African-American. Among all participants, 83% reported the presence of at least one barrier to medication adherence, and 62.5% reported two or more barriers to medication adherence. The most commonly reported barriers were difficulty remembering the amount or time of each medication to take (49%), difficulty opening or reading prescription bottles (42%), feeling worse when taking medications (29%), and trouble affording medications (26%). Considering the multiple comparisons made in this analysis, few significant differences in barrier frequencies were identified between the groups with MCI and normal cognition. CONCLUSION: Multiple medication adherence barriers were identified among all participants, including cognitive, physical, and financial barriers, although few significant differences were identified between those with and without MCI. Interventions capable of addressing multiple barriers are required to improve medication adherence in older adults with and without MCI.