Spinal Stenosis in Familial Transthyretin Amyloidosis.

Here we describe a patient with genetically confirmed ATTR, a family history of the disease and histological confirmation following carpal tunnel release surgery but no other manifestations. The first major neurological or systemic manifestation was cauda equina syndrome with ATTR deposits contributing to lumbar spinal stenosis. Recent gene therapy trials showed improvement in the neuropathy in TTR amyloidosis. This case highlights the need for awareness of the heterogeneous neurological phenotype seen in ATTR to aid earlier diagnosis especially now that disease modifying therapies are available.

A study of the neuropathy associated with transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) in the UK.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is usually characterised by a progressive peripheral and autonomic neuropathy often with associated cardiac failure and is due to dominantly inherited transthyretin mutations causing accelerated amyloid deposition. The UK population is unique in that the majority of patients have the T60A missense mutation in ATTR where tyrosine is replaced by adenine at position 60. This has been traced to a single founder mutation from north-west Ireland. The neuropathy phenotype is less well described than the cardiac manifestations in this group. METHODS: We present the findings from an observational cohort study of patients with ATTR attending the National Hospital Inherited Neuropathy Clinic between 2009 and 2013. Detailed clinical neurological and electrophysiological data were collected on all patients alongside correlating autonomic and cardiac assessments. Follow-up data were available on a subset. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with genetically confirmed ATTR were assessed; 37 were symptomatic; mean age at onset=62 years, range=38-75 years; 75.7% male. T60A was the most common mutation (17/37), followed by V30M (5/37). A severe, rapidly progressive, predominantly length dependent axonal sensorimotor neuropathy was the predominant phenotype. T60A patients were distinguished by earlier and more frequent association with carpal tunnel syndrome; a predominance of negative sensory symptoms at onset; significant vibration deficits; and a non-length dependent progression of motor deficit. Progression of the neuropathy was observed over a relatively short follow-up period (2 years) in 20 patients with evidence of clinically measurable annual change in Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score (-1.5 points per year) and Charcot Marie Tooth Neuropathy Score (CMTNS:2.7 points per year), and a congruent trend in the electrophysiological measures used. CONCLUSION: The description of the ATTR neuropathy phenotype, especially in the T60A patients, should aid early diagnosis as well as contribute to the understanding of its natural history.

Transthyretin V122I amyloidosis with clinical and histological evidence of amyloid neuropathy and myopathy.

Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is a genetically and clinically heterogeneous disease manifesting with predominant peripheral and autonomic neuropathy; cardiomyopathy, or both. ATTR V122I is the most common variant associated with non-neuropathic familial amyloid cardiomyopathy. We present an unusual case of V122I amyloidosis with features of amyloid neuropathy and myopathy, supported by histological confirmation in both sites and diffuse tracer uptake on (99m)Tc-3,3-Diphosphono-1,2-Propanodicarboxylic acid (DPD) scintigraphy throughout skeletal and cardiac muscle. A 64 year old Jamaican man presented with cardiac failure. Cardiac MR revealed infiltrative cardiomyopathy; abdominal fat aspirate confirmed the presence of amyloid, and he was homozygous for the V122I variant of transthyretin. He also described general weakness and EMG demonstrated myopathic features. Sural nerve and vastus lateralis biopsy showed TTR amyloid. The patient is being treated with diflunisal, an oral TTR stabilising agent. Symptomatic myopathy and neuropathy with confirmation of tissue amyloid deposition has not previously been described. Extracardiac amyloidosis has implications for diagnosis and treatment.

A matched comparison of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CVD) versus risk-adapted cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (CTD) in AL amyloidosis.

Despite improvements in therapy amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, there are few studies comparing different regimens. Here we present a matched comparison with 69 patients in each cohort examining upfront therapy with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CVD) vs cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (CTD). On an intention-to-treat basis, the overall response rates were 71.0% vs 79.7% in the CVD and CTD arms, respectively, (P=0.32). A higher complete response (CR) rate was observed in the CVD arm (40.5%) vs CTD (24.6%), P=0.046. One-year overall survival (OS) was 65.2% and 66.7% for CVD and CTD, respectively (P=0.87). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28.0 and 14.0 m for CVD and CTD, respectively (P=0.039). In a landmark analysis assessing outcomes performed at 6 months, the CR rate with CVD was 59.6% vs 34.0% for CTD (P=0.03). The 1-year OS was 96% with CVD and 92% with CTD (P=0.40). The median PFS with CVD was not reached and was 19.2 m with CTD, P=0.028). In summary, both regimens are unable to overcome the high rate of early deaths in AL amyloidosis. However, CVD correlates with improved depth of response and superior PFS supporting its use in the frontline setting. Further optimisation and better supportive-care strategies are required to increase the proportion of patients fully benefiting from therapy.

Renal transplantation in systemic amyloidosis-importance of amyloid fibril type and precursor protein abundance.

Renal transplantation remains contentious in patients with systemic amyloidosis due to the risk of graft loss from recurrent amyloid and progressive disease. Outcomes were sought among all patients attending the UK National Amyloidosis Centre who received a renal transplant (RTx) between January 1978 and May 2011. A total of 111 RTx were performed in 104 patients. Eighty-nine percent of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to hereditary lysozyme and apolipoprotein A-I amyloidosis received a RTx. Outcomes following RTx were generally excellent in these diseases, reflecting their slow natural history; median graft survival was 13.1 years. Only 20% of patients with ESRD due to AA, AL and fibrinogen amyloidosis received a RTx. Median graft survival was 10.3, 5.8 and 7.3 years in these diseases respectively, and outcomes were influenced by fibril precursor protein supply. Patient survival in AL amyloidosis was 8.9 years among those who had achieved at least a partial clonal response compared to 5.2 years among those who had no response (p = 0.02). Post-RTx chemotherapy was administered successfully to four AL patients. RTx outcome is influenced by amyloid type. Suppression of the fibril precursor protein is desirable in the amyloidoses that have a rapid natural history.

Hereditary lysozyme amyloidosis -- phenotypic heterogeneity and the role of solid organ transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Lysozyme amyloidosis (ALys) is a form of hereditary systemic non-neuropathic amyloidosis, which is inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. Lysozyme, which is the amyloidogenic precursor protein in ALys, is a ubiquitous bacteriolytic enzyme synthesized by hepatocytes, polymorphs and macrophages. The aim of this study is to describe the phenotype and outcome of patients with ALys including the role of solid organ transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of patients with ALys. SETTING: UK National Amyloidosis Centre. PATIENTS: All 16 patients with ALys followed at the centre. RESULTS: A family history of amyloidosis was present in every affected individual. Although the phenotype was broadly similar amongst those from the same kindred, there were marked phenotypic differences between kindreds who possessed the same amyloidogenic mutation. Symptomatic gastrointestinal (GI) amyloid was prevalent, and macroscopically visible amyloidotic lesions were present in nine of 10 patients who underwent GI endoscopy. All symptomatic ALys individuals had hepatic amyloid. Four patients received orthotopic liver transplants (OLT), three for spontaneous hepatic rupture and one case, who had extensive hepatic amyloid and a strong family history of hepatic rupture, pre-emptively. All of the liver grafts were functioning at censor 1.7, 5.8, 9.0 and 11.0 years after OLT. Five patients had progressive amyloidotic renal dysfunction culminating in end-stage renal failure, three of whom underwent renal transplantation (RTx). There was no evidence of renal allograft dysfunction at censor 6.6, 1.8 and 0.8 years after RTx. CONCLUSIONS: Lysozyme amyloidosis is a disease of the GI tract, liver and kidneys, which has a slow natural history. There was a clear family history in all cases within this cohort, demonstrating a high clinical penetrance in the presence of an amyloidogenic lysozyme mutation. There is currently no amyloid-specific therapy for the condition which is managed symptomatically. OLT and RTx appear to be successful treatments for patients with liver rupture or end-stage renal disease, respectively, with excellent outcomes in terms of medium-term graft function and patient survival.

Solid organ transplantation in AL amyloidosis.

Vital organ failure remains common in AL amyloidosis. Solid organ transplantation is contentious because of the multisystem nature of this disease and risk of recurrence in the graft. We report outcome among all AL patients evaluated at the UK National Amyloidosis Centre who received solid organ transplants between 1984 and 2009. Renal, cardiac and liver transplants were performed in 22, 14 and 9 patients respectively, representing <2% of all AL patients assessed during the period. One and 5-year patient survival was 95% and 67% among kidney recipients, 86% and 45% among heart recipients and 33% and 22% among liver recipients. No renal graft failed due to recurrent amyloid during median (range) follow up of 4.8 (0.2-13.3) years. Median patient survival was 9.7 years among 8/14 cardiac transplant recipients who underwent subsequent stem cell transplantation (SCT) and 3.4 years in six patients who did not undergo SCT (p = 0.01). Amyloid was widespread in all liver transplant recipients. Solid organ transplantation has rarely been performed in AL amyloidosis, but these findings demonstrate feasibility and support a role in selected patients.

Organ transplantation in hereditary apolipoprotein AI amyloidosis.

Patients with hereditary apolipoprotein AI (apoAI) amyloidosis often have extensive visceral amyloid deposits, and many develop end-stage renal failure as young adults. Solid organ transplantation to replace failing organ function in systemic amyloidosis is controversial due to the multisystem and progressive nature of the disease and the risk of recurrence of amyloid in the graft. We report the outcome of solid organ transplantation, including dual transplants in 4 cases, among 10 patients with apoAI amyloidosis who were followed for a median (range) of 16 (4-28) and 9 (0.2-27) years from diagnosis of amyloidosis and transplantation, respectively. Eight of 10 patients were alive, seven with a functioning graft at censor. Two patients died, one of disseminated cytomegalovirus infection 2 months after renal transplantation and the other of multisystem failure following severe trauma more than 13 years after renal transplantation. The renal transplant of one patient failed due to recurrence of amyloid after 25 years. Amyloid disease progression was very slow and the natural history of the condition was favorably altered in both cases in which the liver was transplanted. Failing organs in hereditary apoAI amyloidosis should be replaced since graft survival is excellent and confers substantial survival benefit.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in primary systemic amyloidosis: the impact of selection criteria on outcome.

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) produces high hematologic and organ responses. However, treatment-related mortality remains high and reported series are subject to selection bias. In all, 48 of 80 amyloid patients referred to our center had AL in the absence of myeloma, 26 of these 48 were deemed transplant candidates and 20 actually underwent ASCT. Transplant-related mortality has fallen from 50 to 20% since January 1999 due to better patient selection and prophylactic measures. Intent-to-treat organ responses were renal (46%), cardiac (25%) and liver (50%). Organ responses in patients who survived transplantation were renal (75%), cardiac (40%) and liver (100%). The 3-year OS post-ASCT was 56% with improved outcome predicted by a better performance status (P=0.08), normal ALP (P=0.08), nephrotic syndrome (P=0.01) and the absence of severe hypotension (P=0.01). The 3-year OS for all referred patients was 44% and this was not significantly better for transplant candidates. Patients with significant hypotension (systolic blood pressure < or =90 mmHg) or poor performance status (ECOG >2) have an exceedingly high treatment-related mortality and should not be transplanted. For those undergoing ASCT, organ response rates appear promising, but conclusive evidence of improved survival for this select group of patients is still lacking and will require randomized trials.

Intermediate dose thalidomide (200 mg daily) has comparable efficacy and less toxicity than higher doses in relapsed multiple myeloma.

Thalidomide at doses >200 mg has 100% grade 1-2 and 25% grade 3-4 toxicities requiring discontinuation. We report a retrospective study of relapsed myeloma patients treated with thalidomide 200 mg with no dose escalation. Thirty patients were identified; 43% of patients responded with paraprotein decline >75% -- 2 (6%), 50-75% -- 7 (23%), 25-50% -- 4 (14%) and 2 (6%) were stable. All five patients with 13q deletion responded. Only 54% reported grade 1-2 toxicities (none reporting > grade 2) with 5 (17%) discontinuing treatment due to toxicity. Thalidomide 200 mg daily with no dose escalation appears as effective and better tolerated than escalated doses for relapsed myeloma patients.