Association between ABCB1 (3435C>T) polymorphism and susceptibility of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Studies on the relationship between ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism (rs1045642) and colorectal cancer (CRC)susceptibility have yielded inconclusive results. To clarify this issue, we undertook a meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between rs1045642 and CRC risk.Three electronic scientific publication databases (Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Embase) were screened using specific search terms. Relevant literature was identified using literature traceability methods. Selected publications were evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Effect size information (odds ratio and the corresponding 95% confidence interval [CI]) was obtained following quality assessment and data extraction from the included publications, and a meta-analysis conducted. Statistical analysis was performed with the Stata sofz (Version 13.0) software.Overall, 17 case-control studies involving 7129 CRC patients and 7710 healthy control subjects satisfied the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. There was no significant association between ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism and CRC risk in any of the genetic models. In the CC versus CT model (I = 20.9%, Pheterogeneity = .276), CC versus CT + TT model (I = 45.6%, Pheterogeneity = .102) and CT versus CC + TT model (I = 17.8%, Pheterogeneity = .298) analyses, between-study heterogeneities were detected as significant in Asian populations. In the CT versus TT model (I = 24%, Pheterogeneity = .254) and CC + CT versus TT model (I = 0, Pheterogeneity = .55), between-study heterogeneities were found to be significant in groups of different populations.The meta-analysis described here suggests that the ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism is not related to CRC susceptibility.

KRAS polymorphisms are associated with survival of CRC in Chinese population.

rs12245, rs12587, rs9266, rs1137282, rs61764370, and rs712 of KRAS oncogene are characterized in the 3'UTR. The study highlights the important role of these polymorphisms playing in the susceptibility, oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy sensitivity, progression, and prognosis of CRC. Improved multiplex ligation detection reaction (iMLDR) technique is used for genotyping. An unconditional logistic regression model was used to estimate the association of certain polymorphism and CRC risk. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression model were used to evaluate the effects of polymorphisms on survival analysis. Results demonstrated that TT genotype and T allele of rs712 were associated with the increased risk of CRC; the patients with GG genotype and G allele of rs61764370 had a shorter survival and a higher risk of relapse or metastasis of CRC. Our studies supported the conclusions that rs61764370 and rs712 polymorphisms of the KRAS are functional and it may play an important role in the development of CRC and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy efficiency and prognosis of CRC.