Heparin anticoagulation versus regional citrate anticoagulation for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with increased bleeding risk.

Background Heparin anticoagulation (HA) is commonly employed for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange (mTPE). However, for patients with increased bleeding risk, there were controversial opinions on the use of HA versus regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for mTPE. Our present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HA vs. RCA for mTPE in patients with increased bleeding risk.Methods Patients with increased bleeding risk who underwent mTPE between 2014 and 2021 in our center were screened. Observations of anticoagulation efficacy and safety were used as the study endpoints.Results A total of 108 patients with 368 mTPE sessions were included. Of the included patients, 38 and 70 received HA and RCA mTPE, respectively. There was no significant difference in the clotting of extracorporeal circuits between the HA and RCA groups (4.1% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.605). More bleeding episodes were observed in the HA group compared to the RCA group (16.4% vs. 4.4% mTPE sessions, p < 0.001). The frequency of postoperative transfusion within 24 h (11% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.007) was significantly different in the HA and RCA group. Anticoagulation strategy (HA vs. RCA; OR 5.659, 95%CI 2.266-14.129; p < 0.001), and mean arterial pressure (prior treatment, OR 1.052, 95%CI 1.019-1.086; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors of bleeding episodes. At the end of mTPE treatment, the incidence of metabolic alkalosis (16.7% vs. 54.1%, p = 0.027) and hypocalcemia (41.7% vs. 89.2%, p = 0.001) was significantly different in the HA (n = 5, 12 sessions) and RCA (n = 22, 74 sessions) groups, respectively.Conclusion RCA is as effective as HA for mTPE. However, for patients with increased bleeding risk, RCA is associated with a lower risk of bleeding, compared with HA. With careful monitoring and timely adjustment, RCA most likely is a safe and effective anticoagulation option for mTPE in patients with increased bleeding risk.

Long-term arteriovenous fistula prognosis for maintenance hemodialysis patients who accepted PIRRT by using arteriovenous fistula.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients are often admitted to the hospital for severe morbidities. Prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT) is required during the hospital staying. There are controversial opinions on the use of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as vascular access for PIRRT in MHD patients. METHODS: Patients with AVF who accepted PIRRT in our center between January 2014 and June 2021 were retrospectively screened. AVF dysfunction and patient mortality were assessed as endpoints. Univariate and multivariate regression models were employed to identify the risk factors of AVF dysfunction. RESULTS: About 162 patients were included in our present study. Twenty-six experienced AVF dysfunction, of whom 53.8%, 19.2%, and 27.0% had percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty, surgical revision, and AVF reconstruction, respectively. The accumulated AVF dysfunction rates were 11.8%, 16.2%, and 21.0% in 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that smoking (HR 2.750, 95% CI 1.181-6.402, p = 0.019), higher platelet (PLT, HR 1.009, 95% CI 1.000-1.017, p = 0.047), higher prothrombin activity (PTA, HR 1.039, 95% CI 1.012-1.066, p = 0.004), and lower diastolic blood pressure (DBP, HR 0.963, 95% CI 0.932-0.996, p = 0.026) were independent risk factors for AVF dysfunction. During the follow-up period, 37 patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the use of AVF for PIRRT might not dramatically increase the incidence of AVF dysfunction. And, Smoking, lower DBP, higher PLT, and higher PTA were associated with increased AVF dysfunction.