Prognostic significance of circulating Epstein-Barr virus DNA in pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: A meta-analysis and validation study.

In small-scale studies, circulating Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels have prognostic value in patients with pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC). Therefore, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of circulating EBV DNA levels in patients with pulmonary LELC. Studies that discussed the prognostic significance of circulating EBV DNA detection in pulmonary LELC were eligible for inclusion in this study. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the primary outcomes. Pooled hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p value were calculated to estimate the prognostic significance of EBV DNA levels. Additionally, we conducted a further observation using an independent cohort. The pooled HR and 95% CI of pretreatment EBV DNA levels for OS and PFS were 3.63 (95% CI: 2.90-4.55) and 2.88 (95% CI: 1.90-4.38), respectively. The pooled HR and 95% CI for Posttreatment EBV DNA levels for OS and PFS were 3.77 (95% CI: 2.96-4.80) and 3.52 (95% CI: 1.91-6.51, p < 0.001), respectively. The independent cohort showed similar results that patients with high pretreatment EBV DNA or positive posttreatment EBV DNA had significantly inferior PFS. Circulating EBV DNA levels provide prognostic values of survival and treatment response in pulmonary LELC patients.

Clinical analysis of hypereosinophilic syndrome first presenting with asthma-like symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical manifestations of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) are diverse. This study aimed to summarise these clinical characteristics with asthma-like onset as the first symptom, and compare these characteristics and treatment strategies between idiopathic and parasitic HES. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 36 HES patients with asthma-like symptoms as the first episode, between January 2013 and October 2019. Data of patients with HES of an unknown cause (idiopathic HES) and parasitic infection (parasite HES) were analysed. RESULTS: The idiopathic and parasite HES groups included 16 and 20 patients, respectively, with more males in the parasite HES group (p < .05). Wheezing and dry rales was the most common symptom and signs, with no significant differences in symptoms and signs between the groups. The most often misdiagnosed disease was bronchial asthma. The peripheral blood eosinophil count was significantly increased compared with normal counts in both groups (p > .05). Abnormal pulmonary function is mainly manifested as obstructive ventilatory disorder and mixed ventilatory disorder. Chest computed tomography showed extensive ground-glass exudation, patches, consolidation, nodules, and pleural effusion. Histopathological examination showed eosinophilic infiltration without vasculitis or granuloma. Glucocorticoids had a significant therapeutic effect, and the parasite HES group required combined deworming drugs. The duration of corticosteroids therapy in the idiopathic HES group was significantly longer than that in the parasite HES group (p < .05). The overall prognosis was good, and 81.25% of the patients were clinically cured in the parasite HES group; however, relapse occurred easily in the idiopathic HES group. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma-like symptoms, obstructive ventilatory disorder or positive bronchial dilation test, and poor response to inhaled corticosteroids are not necessarily indicative of refractory asthma; HES should be considered. The clinical characteristics of HES of different aetiologies are similar. Systemic corticosteroid therapy is preferred for idiopathic and parasitic infections. Idiopathic HES is treated with prolonged corticosteroids and relapses easily.Key MessagesAsthma-like symptoms, obstructive ventilatory disorder or positive bronchial dilation tests, and poor responses to inhaled corticosteroids are not necessarily indicative of refractory asthma, and hypereosinophilic syndrome should be considered.The clinical characteristics of hypereosinophilic syndrome of different aetiologies are similar, and systemic glucocorticoid therapy is preferred for both idiopathic and parasitic infections.Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome is treated with prolonged corticosteroids and relapses easily.