Good vibrations: do electrical therapeutic massagers work?

Health, leisure and beauty activities are increasing in popularity, with a particular emphasis on self-help and alternative health practices. One product type that has increased sales with this expansion is the hand-held electric massager. These are products that use vibration as a means of alleviating muscular strains and pains, as well as promoting relaxation. Paradoxically, these products are extremely popular as gifts, but are soon discarded. A multi-disciplinary research team was commissioned by a British manufacturer of electrical consumer products to investigate user attitudes and perceptions of existing massagers, to identify areas of user dissatisfaction. The manufacturer was also concerned about a possible stigma attached to these products because of an association with sex aids. This paper provides an account of the perceptions of both consumers and therapists regarding the use of these products. Identifying the differences between the perceptions of consumers and therapists should help provide a basis for effective integration of user needs, manufacturer requirements, designers' skills and sound therapeutic practice. The results provide insight to support the development of more effective hand-held massagers.

A new assay for thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies.

A new procedure for measuring patient serum thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) autoantibodies is described in which the autoantibodies inhibit binding of a human monoclonal thyroid stimulating antibody M22 (labeled with biotin) to TSHR-coated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plate wells. In the assay, M22-biotin binding is detected by addition of streptavidin peroxidase. The M22 based assay was more sensitive than a similar ELISA based on inhibition of TSH-biotin binding to TSHR coated wells with 1 U/L of NIBSC 90/672 giving approximately 35% inhibition in the M22-based system compared to approximately 15% inhibition in the TSH-based ELISA. This had an important impact on the precision of the 2 assays with the M22-based ELISA showing an interassay coefficient of variation (CV) of 10% at 1 U/L whereas the TSH-based ELISA had an interassay CV of 20% at 1 U/L. Analysis of sera from 307 control subjects without a diagnosis of Graves' disease indicated that only 2 (0.65%) gave inhibition of M22 binding values of greater than 10% (11% and 12% inhibition). In the case of sera from 108 patients with Graves' disease (treated and untreated) 103 (95%) gave inhibition of M22 binding values of 14% or greater. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plot analysis showed that 100% specificity for TSHR autoantibody detection in Graves' disease was obtained at 95% sensitivity for the M22-based ELISA and 89% sensitivity for the TSH-biotin-based ELISA. Inhibition of M22 binding to the TSHR was closely correlated to inhibition of TSH binding in the 108 Graves' sera (r = 0.99). However, inhibition of M22 binding was almost always greater resulting in improved sensitivity and precision.

Discordant serum thyroglobulin results generated by two classes of assay in patients with thyroid carcinoma: correlation with clinical outcome after 3 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Serum thyroglobulin measurement is an integral part of monitoring patients with thyroid carcinoma, but analytic problems pose serious difficulties in the utility of this test. METHODS: Between 1997 and 1998, serum samples from 83 patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma were collected. Serum thyroglobulin was assayed by both radioimmunoassay and by an immunoradiometric assay. The disease status of patients with discordant serum thyroglobulin results was assessed in June 2001. Therefore, the predictive value of a single thyroglobulin measurement was assessed by evaluating the clinical status of patients 3 years later. RESULTS: Discordant serum thyroglobulin results were noted in 17 (20.4%) patients. Of the 17 patients with discordant results, 16 had adequate clinical follow-up data. Of these 16 patients, 11 patients had detectable levels of serum thyroglobulin by immunoradiometric assay (range, 1.4-350 microg/L) whereas levels were undetectable by radioimmunoassay (< 1 microg/L). All 11 patients had evidence of metastases 3 years later. Two patients had undetectable serum thyroglobulin levels using the immunoradiometric assay (< 1 microg/L), whereas they had detectable levels using radioimmunoassay (serum thyroglobulin 7.2-30 microg/L). The serum samples from both patients had normal recoveries and positive antithyroglobulin antibodies. Both patients developed metastases 3 years later. CONCLUSIONS: False-negative serum thyroglobulin results were significantly higher with the radioimmunoassay method compared with the immunoradiometric assay. The immunoradiometric assay is more reliable than the radioimmunoassay, particularly in patients who have no thyroglobulin antibodies. This finding is novel in that traditional immunoradiometric assay systems compared with radioimmunoassays usually have a higher incidence of false-negative results when assessed against clinical status. The immunoradiometric assay is subject to false-negative results in some patients with thyroglobulin antibodies, even when recovery experiments indicate the absence of interference. Thyroglobulin antibodies should be measured in all patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma and if positive, results should be interpreted with extreme caution.