Effects of Reslizumab on Asthma Outcomes in a Subgroup of Eosinophilic Asthma Patients with Self-Reported Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.

BACKGROUND: An estimated 7% of patients with asthma have chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), and more than 80% have at least some radiographic evidence of sinonasal inflammation. Aspirin sensitivity is strongly associated with elevated blood eosinophil levels and increased asthma severity. Intravenous (IV) reslizumab has been shown to improve asthma control in patients with nasal polyps. OBJECTIVE: These post hoc analyses of pooled data from 2 BREATH phase 3 clinical trials, studies 1 and 2 (NCT01287039 and NCT01285323), examined asthma-related outcomes in patients with comorbid, self-reported CRSwNP with and without aspirin sensitivity. METHODS: Patients aged 12-75 years with elevated blood eosinophils (≥400 cells/µL) and inadequately controlled asthma were randomized to receive placebo or reslizumab (3 mg/kg IV) every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Patients continued their background asthma maintenance therapy during the study. Information regarding the presence of CRSwNP was obtained through patient-reported medical history. RESULTS: Add-on reslizumab treatment reduced the frequency of clinical asthma exacerbations by 83% versus placebo among patients with CRSwNP. Among patients with and without aspirin sensitivity, reductions of 79% and 84%, respectively, were observed. Patients with CRSwNP (with and without aspirin sensitivity) treated with reslizumab add-on therapy also had significant improvements in lung function, as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second, compared with placebo. Among patients with CRSwNP, reslizumab was also associated with improvements in patient-reported asthma control and asthma quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with eosinophilic asthma and self-reported CRSwNP, with and without aspirin sensitivity, are highly responsive to treatment with reslizumab for asthma-related outcomes. These findings suggest that prospective investigation of reslizumab in this patient population is warranted.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in perennial allergic rhinitis and comorbid asthma.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab, an anti-IL-4 receptor α mAb, inhibits IL-4/IL-13 signaling, key drivers of type 2/TH2 immune diseases (eg, atopic/allergic disease). In a pivotal, phase 2b study (NCT01854047), dupilumab reduced severe exacerbations, improved lung function and quality of life, and was generally well tolerated in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma despite using medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting ß2-agonists. OBJECTIVE: To examine dupilumab's effect on the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) total score and its allergic rhinitis (AR)-associated items in asthma patients with comorbid perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). METHODS: A post hoc analysis reporting data from the phase 2b study for the 200 and 300 mg every 2 week (q2w) doses under investigation in phase 3 (NCT02414854) was carried out. PAR was defined at study entry as a specific response to typical perennial antigens (IgE ≥0.35 Ku/L). RESULTS: Overall, 241 (61%) patients had PAR. In asthma patients with PAR, dupilumab 300 mg q2w versus placebo significantly improved SNOT-22 total score (least squares mean difference, -5.98; 95% CI, -10.45 to -1.51; P = .009) and all 4 AR-associated symptoms evaluated (nasal blockage, -0.60; 95% CI, -0.96 to -0.25; runny nose, -0.67; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.31; sneezing, -0.55; 95% CI, -0.89 to -0.21; postnasal discharge, -0.49; 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.16; all P < .01). Dupilumab 200 mg q2w demonstrated numerical, but not statistically significant, decreases in SNOT-22 total score (-1.82; 95% CI, -6.46 to 2.83; P = .443 vs placebo) and in each AR-associated symptom. In patients without PAR, no differences were observed for these measures versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab 300 mg q2w significantly improved AR-associated nasal symptoms in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma and comorbid PAR.

Data on the oral CRTh2 antagonist QAW039 (fevipiprant) in patients with uncontrolled allergic asthma.

This article contains data on clinical endpoints (Peak Flow Expiratory Rate, fractional exhaled nitric oxide and total IgE serum levels) and plasma pharmacokinetic parameters concerning the use of the oral CRTh2 antagonist QAW039 (fevipiprant) in mild to moderate asthma patients. Information on experimental design and methods on how this data was obtained is also described. Further interpretation and discussion of this data can be found in the article "The oral CRTh2 antagonist QAW039 (fevipiprant): a phase II study in uncontrolled allergic asthma" (Erpenbeck et al., in press) [1].

Efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma uncontrolled with high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ß2-agonists (SIROCCO): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilia is associated with worsening asthma severity and decreased lung function, with increased exacerbation frequency. We assessed the safety and efficacy of benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-5 receptor α that depletes eosinophils by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with eosinophilia. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase 3 study at 374 sites in 17 countries. We recruited patients (aged 12-75 years) with a physician-based diagnosis of asthma for at least 1 year and at least two exacerbations while on high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ß2-agonists (ICS plus LABA) in the previous year. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by an interactive web-based voice response system to benralizumab 30 mg either every 4 weeks (Q4W) or every 8 weeks (Q8W; first three doses every 4 weeks) or placebo Q4W for 48 weeks as add on to their standard treatment. Patients were stratified 2:1 according to blood eosinophil counts of at least 300 cells per µL and less than 300 cells per µL. All patients and investigators involved in patient treatment or clinical assessment were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was annual exacerbation rate ratio versus placebo, and key secondary endpoints were prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and total asthma symptom score at week 48, for patients with blood eosinophil counts of at least 300 cells per µL. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat (based on the full analysis set); safety analyses included patients according to study drug received. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01928771. FINDINGS: Between Sept 19, 2013, and March 16, 2015, 2681 patients were enrolled, 1205 of whom met the study criteria and were randomly assigned: 407 to placebo, 400 to benralizumab 30 mg Q4W, and 398 to benralizumab 30 mg Q8W. 267 patients in the placebo group, 275 in the benralizumab 30 mg Q4W group, and 267 in the benralizumab 30 mg Q8W group had blood eosinophil counts at least 300 cells per µL and were included in the primary analysis population. Compared with placebo, benralizumab reduced the annual asthma exacerbation rate over 48 weeks when given Q4W (rate ratio 0·55, 95% CI 0·42-0·71; p<0·0001) or Q8W (0·49, 0·37-0·64; p<0·0001). Both benralizumab dosing regimens significantly improved prebronchodilator FEV1 in patients at week 48 compared with placebo (least-squares mean change from baseline: Q4W group 0·106 L, 95% CI 0·016-0·196; Q8W group 0·159 L, 0·068-0·249). Compared with placebo, asthma symptoms were improved by the Q8W regimen (least-squares mean difference -0·25, 95% CI -0·45 to -0·06), but not the Q4W regimen (-0·08, -0·27 to 0·12). The most common adverse events were worsening asthma (105 [13%] of 797 benralizumab-treated patients vs 78 [19%] of 407 placebo-treated patients) and nasopharyngitis (93 [12%] vs 47 [12%]). INTERPRETATION: These results confirm the efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma and elevated eosinophils, which are uncontrolled by high-dosage ICS plus LABA, and provide support for benralizumab to be an additional option to treat this disease in this patient population. FUNDING: AstraZeneca and Kyowa Hakko Kirin.

The oral CRTh2 antagonist QAW039 (fevipiprant): A phase II study in uncontrolled allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: There is an unmet medical need for allergic asthma patients who are uncontrolled on conventional therapies. The aim of this study was to collect efficacy and safety data for QAW039, an oral chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTh2) receptor antagonist, for the treatment of asthma. METHODS: This was an exploratory phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multi-center study. Patients with mild-to-moderate uncontrolled allergic asthma (N = 170) were either without or weaned off inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting ß-agonists (LABA) and randomized (1:1) to QAW039 (500 mg once daily) or to placebo for 28 days. RESULTS: Overall, 157 patients completed the study. There were no significant differences between QAW039 and placebo for trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) or Asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) in the total population. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that patients with a FEV1 <70% of predicted at baseline treated with QAW039 had significant improvement compared with placebo in trough FEV1 (QAW039- Placebo [Δ] = 207 mL; 90% confidence interval [CI]: 96, 319; P = 0.002) and ACQ7 (Δ = -0.41; 90%CI: -0.69, -0.13; P = 0.009). QAW039 reached a mean maximum concentration (Cmax) of 3440 ng/mL on day 28 at a median Tmax of 1 h (range 0.5-4 h). Most adverse events (AEs) were mild/moderate and balanced between both groups, with no serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS: In the general study population, no improvement in lung function was observed with QAW039. However, a subgroup analysis revealed that patients with greater severity of airflow limitation (FEV1 < 70%) had improved lung function and asthma control when treated with QAW039. QAW039 also demonstrated a favorable safety profile. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT01253603.

The association between seasonal asthma exacerbations and viral respiratory infections in a pediatric population receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy with or without long-acting beta-adrenoceptor agonist: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: A seasonal peak in asthma exacerbations in the fall has previously been reported. The association between fall exacerbations and viral respiratory tract infections (RTI) remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the number of fall exacerbations and the incidence of RTIs in a pediatric asthmatic population using an at-home mucus collection methodology. METHODS: This was a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group exploratory study. Children, 4-11 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of asthma requiring use of an inhaled corticosteroid, a morning peak expiratory flow ≥70% predicted and a history of ≥1 asthma exacerbation during the previous respiratory viral season were eligible for enrollment. Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) 100/50 mcg or FP 100 mcg prior to starting school. Subjects collected mucus samples using an at-home kit when they experienced respiratory symptoms. Mucus samples obtained during symptomatic periods were analyzed for common respiratory viruses by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. The number of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids was recorded. RESULTS: In total, 339 (FP/SAL, n = 171; FP, n = 168) subjects were randomized and included in the intent-to-treat population; 292 (86%) completed the study. Of the 537 mucus samples collected, 64% tested positive for viruses, but only 6% of positive samples were associated with an asthma exacerbation. Exacerbations were infrequent, with only 41 subjects reporting 49 exacerbations in total. Adverse events were reported in 66% of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In a susceptible population, the fall asthma exacerbation rates in children were low despite frequent detection of viral RTIs. NCT01192178; GSK ID: ADA113872.

Long-term efficacy and safety of once-daily treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate nasal aerosol.

Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) nasal aerosol has an established efficacy and safety profile for short-term allergic rhinitis (AR) treatment. However, managing perennial AR (PAR) symptoms often requires long-term treatment. This study evaluates efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with BDP nasal aerosol in PAR patients. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients (≥12 years [n = 529]) were randomized 4:1 to once-daily treatment with BDP nasal aerosol at 320 µg or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in weekly averages of patient-reported 24-hour reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) over 30 weeks. Safety and tolerability of BDP nasal aerosol were also assessed. Ocular safety, including changes in intraocular pressure and severity of lens opacities (nuclear opalescence, nuclear color, cortical lens opacity, and posterior subcapsular lens opacity), was measured for patients who completed 52 weeks of treatment (n = 245). Across 30 and 52 weeks, BDP nasal aerosol significantly improved rTNSS and instantaneous TNSS (iTNSS) versus placebo (least-squares mean treatment difference, rTNSS, -0.97 for 30 weeks and -1.09 for 52 weeks, p < 0.001 for both; iTNSS, -0.96 for 30 weeks and -1.10 for 52 weeks], p < 0.001 for both). BDP nasal aerosol was well tolerated. Incidence of most adverse events with BDP nasal aerosol was similar to that with placebo, except for epistaxis, which occurred more frequently with active treatment. Severity of changes from baseline in ocular lens opacities was comparable between treatments. BDP nasal aerosol at 320 µg once daily was safe and effective for long-term PAR treatment, with no evidence of clinically adverse systemic safety events. This study was a part of the clinical trial NCT00988247 registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov.

Bronchodilation with mometasone furoate/formoterol fumarate administered by metered-dose inhaler with and without a spacer in children with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: The bronchodilatory effect of mometasone furoate/formoterol fumarate (MF/F) administered by metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with or without a spacer has not been evaluated previously in children aged 5-11 years. METHODS: This was a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, single-dose, four-period crossover study. Children with persistent asthma aged 5-11 years participated in this study. Subjects used inhaled corticosteroids with/without long-acting beta-2 agonists for 12 weeks before enrollment and at screening had forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1 ) ≥70% predicted. Subjects received MF/F MDI 100/10 µg with/without spacer (AeroChamber Plus® with Flow-Vu® Anti-Static Valved Holding Chamber), F-Dry Powder Inhaler (F-DPI) 10 µg, and placebo MDI with/without spacer in separate treatment periods. The primary endpoint was FEV1 area under the curve from 0 to 12 hr (AUC0-12hr ) for the comparison of MF/F with spacer versus placebo. Secondary measurements included MF/F without spacer versus placebo, as well as MF/F with spacer versus MF/F without spacer, and F-DPI versus placebo. Analysis was performed with an analysis of covariance model for a crossover study. RESULTS: Data from 87 subjects were analyzed. MF/F with spacer demonstrated a larger change in mean FEV1 AUC0-12hr versus placebo (115 vs. -9 mL), with a treatment difference of 124 mL (95% CI 94-154, P < 0.001). Similarly, MF/F without spacer versus placebo resulted in a 102 mL difference in mean-adjusted FEV1 AUC0-12hr (95% CI 73-131, P < 0.001), whereas the difference between MF/F with spacer versus MF/F without spacer was 22 mL (95% CI -8 to 52, P = 0.144). The difference between F-DPI versus placebo was 106 mL (95% CI 77-135, P < 0.001). No unexpected adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, MF/F MDI 100/10 µg demonstrated significant bronchodilation in children aged 5-11 years regardless of the use of a spacer. No difference in bronchodilation was observed between MF/F MDI and F-DPI.

Recommendations for the pharmacologic management of allergic rhinitis.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects at least 60 million people in the United States each year, resulting in a major impact on patient quality of life, productivity, and direct and indirect costs. As new therapies, data, and literature emerge in the management of AR, there is a need to communicate and disseminate important information to health care professionals to advance the practice of medicine and lessen the disease burden from AR. Treatment recommendations for AR have not been updated since the 2012 Food and Drug Administration approval of nonaqueous intranasal aerosol agents using hydrofluoroalkane propellants and the first aqueous intranasal combination product. Here, we present an updated algorithm for the pharmacologic treatment of AR that includes these new treatment options. Treatment recommendations are categorized by disease severity (mild versus moderate/severe) and duration of symptoms (episodic versus nonepisodic, with episodic defined as <3 days/wk or for <3 weeks). Preferred treatments are suggested, as well as alternative options for consideration by clinicians in the context of individual patient needs. This recommendation article also outlines the importance of treatment monitoring, which can be conducted using the recently developed Rhinitis Control Assessment Test. Successful therapeutic outcomes depend on multiple factors, including use of the most effective pharmacologic agents as well as patient adherence to therapy. Therefore, it is imperative that rhinitis patients not only receive the most effective therapeutic options, but that they also understand and are able to adhere to the comprehensive treatment regimen. Successful treatment, with all of these considerations in mind, results in better disease outcomes, improved quality of life for patients, and greater economic productivity in the home and workplace.

Patient satisfaction with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler with an integrated dose counter containing a fixed-dose mometasone furoate/formoterol combination.

INTRODUCTION: Inhaled delivery devices that are easy to use and facilitate dose tracking may lead to improved patient satisfaction and adherence. Patient satisfaction with a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with an integrated dose counter containing a fixed-dose mometasone furoate/formoterol combination (MF/F MDI dose counter) was evaluated in subjects with persistent asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: In this multicenter study (N = 272, age range: 12-92 years), subject experience and satisfaction with MDI devices was evaluated using baseline and poststudy surveys. Subjects responded to the baseline survey based on their previous MDI experience, then received MF/F MDI 100/10 µg with the integrated dose counter for 4 weeks before completing the poststudy survey. This evaluation was part of a broader study objective to assess performance of the MF/F MDI dose counter. RESULTS: At baseline, 52% of subjects reported being extremely satisfied with their previous MDI. After using the MF/F MDI dose counter, a relative increase of 43% in overall satisfaction was observed. Approximately 90% of subjects agreed the MF/F dose counter helped them track doses and was easy to use; >80% agreed the inhaler was of good quality and well designed. Subjects agreed the dose counter relieved anxiety about running out of medication (68%) or taking a subtherapeutic dose (65%). Nearly 80% of subjects had no reservations about the MF/F MDI dose counter, and most subjects stated they would request it from their physician (66%) and recommend it to a friend (75%). CONCLUSIONS: The MF/F MDI dose counter was found to be easy to use and have overall high patient satisfaction.

Twelve-week efficacy and safety study of mometasone furoate/formoterol 200/10 microg and 400/10 microg combination treatments in patients with persistent asthma previously receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids.

A significant unmet medical need exists in patients with uncontrolled asthma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate/formoterol (MF/F) 400/10 microg versus MF 400 microg administered twice-daily (b.i.d.) via metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma uncontrolled on high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). In a 12-week, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients (>or=12 years of age) were randomized to MF/F 200/10 microg, MF/F 400/10 microg, or MF 400 microg, b.i.d. after a 2- to 3-week open-label run in with MF 400 microg b.i.d. The primary end point was mean change in area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1) AUC(0-12h)) from baseline to week 12 for MF/F 400/10 microg versus MF 400 microg. Effects of MF/F on asthma control and symptoms were evaluated and adverse events recorded. Seven hundred twenty-eight patients were randomized. Significant improvement from baseline to week 12 occurred for mean change in FEV(1) AUC(0-12h) with MF/F 400/10 microg (4.19 L x hour) versus MF 400 microg (2.04 L x hour; p < 0.001). Both MF/F doses resulted in rapid (5 minutes) and sustained improvement in lung function throughout 12 weeks. Both MF/F doses were superior to MF in improving asthma control and reducing nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring short-acting beta(2)-agonist use. All treatments were well tolerated. Asthma patients who were poorly controlled on high-dose ICS experienced significant improvement in asthma control, lung function, and symptoms when treated with MF/F compared with MF.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of ciclesonide in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids.

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are recommended as first-line treatment for persistent asthma. This study was designed to evaluate the ability of ciclesonide (CIC) in subjects with stable asthma previously receiving another ICS or ICS/long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA) to maintain asthma disease control. In this 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study, subjects aged > or =12 years with stable mild-to-moderate persistent asthma were switched at randomization from an ICS or ICS/LABA to CIC, 80 microg twice daily (CIC80 b.i.d.; n = 149); CIC, 160 microg once daily (CIC160 q.d.; n = 150); or placebo (n = 147). Change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1); primary end point), morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), rescue albuterol use, total asthma symptom score, nighttime awakenings, and safety were evaluated. FEV(1) improved from baseline to week 12 after CIC80 b.i.d. treatment (+0.07 L; p = 0.0232), and was maintained after CIC160 q.d. (+0.01 L; p = 0.6217). FEV(1) declined from baseline after placebo (-0.12 L; p < 0.0001) and significantly versus CIC treatments (p < 0.001). At week 12, morning PEF maintained baseline values after CIC80 b.i.d. (-4.43 L/minute; p = 0.1272) and decreased after CIC160 q.d. (-5.77 L/minute; p = 0.0490) and placebo (-12.82 L/minute; p < 0.0001); the difference between CIC80 b.i.d. and placebo was significant (p = 0.035). Baseline albuterol use, total daily asthma score, and nighttime awakenings were maintained after CIC treatments (p > 0.25), but increased after placebo (p < or = 0.002); the difference between CIC80 b.i.d. and placebo was significant (p < 0.02). Incidence of adverse events was similar among treatment groups (range, 52.0-57.9%). In this study, CIC80 b.i.d. maintained asthma control in subjects with stable mild-to-moderate asthma previously treated with ICS or ICS/LABA, was well tolerated, and, in general, was better than CIC160 q.d. in maintaining disease control.

Efficacy of montelukast for treating perennial allergic rhinitis.

Perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) is a chronic inflammatory nasal condition in individuals exposed year-round to allergens. This was a double-blind study of 15- to 85-year-old patients randomly allocated to montelukast, 10 mg (n=630), placebo (n=613), or the positive control cetirizine, 10 mg (n=122) for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score (DNSS; mean of congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching scores, rated daily by patients [scale: 0=none to 3=severe]) averaged during the initial 4 weeks (primary analysis) or entire 6 weeks of treatment. Also assessed were combined post hoc results of primary end point data from this study and another similarly designed study (Patel P, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of montelukast for treating perennial allergic rhinitis, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 95:551, 2005). Over 4 weeks, montelukast showed numerical improvement over placebo in DNSS (least-squares mean difference of -0.04 [95% confidence interval (CI}, -0.09, 0.01]); the difference between cetirizine and placebo was significant: -0.10 (95% CI, -0.19, -0.01). However, when averaged over 6 weeks, neither active treatment was significantly different from placebo. The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life score was significantly improved by montelukast (p < 0.05), but not by cetirizine, during 4 and 6 weeks. The treatment effect of montelukast, but not cetirizine, generally remained consistent through the 6 weeks of treatment. In pooled data, montelukast consistently improved DNSS versus placebo during all 6 weeks of treatment (-0.07 [95% CI, -0.10, -0.041). In conclusion, montelukast produced numerical improvement in daytime nasal symptoms and significant improvement in quality of life. In a pooled post hoc analysis, montelukast provided consistent improvement in daytime nasal symptoms over 6 weeks, supportive of an overall benefit in PAR.

Effects of treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in children with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (DPI) has been shown to effectively treat asthma in children. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of mometasone furoate DPI in the treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in children previously using inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). METHODS: A 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study evaluated 2 dosing regimens of mometasone furoate DPI (100 microg every evening and 100 microg twice daily) in 296 children 4 to 11 years old with asthma previously using ICSs. The primary efficacy variable was the change in percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to end point. Secondary efficacy variables included absolute FEV1, forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% forced vital capacity, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, albuterol use, nocturnal awakenings, response to therapy, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline at end point in predicted FEV1 were 4.73 and 5.52 percentage points for mometasone furoate DPI, 100 microg every evening and 100 microg twice daily, respectively, the difference of which was not significant, and -1.77 percentage points for placebo (P < or = .002). Significant improvements in secondary efficacy variables were also observed for both mometasone furoate DPI treatments over placebo. Both mometasone furoate DPI doses were well tolerated, and no significant differences were noted among the 3 treatment groups in adverse event reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Both mometasone furoate DPI doses were well tolerated and significantly improved lung function, maintained effective asthma control, and improved quality of life in children with asthma.

Optimal management of community-acquired acute bacterial rhinosinusitis: the allergist's perspective.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the antibiotic resistance seen in community-acquired respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and determine which characteristics to look for in an antibiotic to improve clinical outcomes and decrease the potential for development of resistance. DATA SOURCES: Using MEDLINE, we performed a search of articles published from 1966 to 2004 to evaluate the current literature on the subject of antibiotic resistance and strategies to overcome it. Additional cited references, such as abstracts, were also identified. STUDY SELECTION: Relevant original research articles, reviews, and published abstracts were selected for inclusion in this review. RESULTS: Several factors were identified that should be considered when choosing empiric antibiotic therapy for community-acquired RTIs with the goal of improving clinical outcomes while minimizing the risk of resistance. These factors include spectrum of activity, bactericidal vs bacteriostatic activity, chemical structure, elimination half-life, and potency. CONCLUSIONS: The results of these studies support the use of targeted antibiotic agents that, based on structural and chemical properties, are optimized to have a low potential to induce resistance. This approach to antimicrobial therapy appears to be the most suitable for patients with acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and other community-acquired RTIs.

Onset of efficacy of montelukast in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Montelukast has shown efficacy for seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR); however, onset of action for SAR has not been presented. The aim of this study was to determine the onset of action of montelukast, 10 mg, measured in days after starting once-daily therapy, in spring and fall studies of SAR. Data were analyzed from four 2-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trials. End points included the daytime nasal symptoms score, the nighttime symptoms score, the composite symptoms score (mean of the scores for daytime nasal symptoms and nighttime symptoms), and the daytime eye symptoms score. Using a 0-3 scale (no symptoms to severe symptoms), daytime symptoms were rated by patients once daily each evening; nighttime symptoms were rated once daily each morning. Analyses of data pooled across the four evening dosing studies showed that montelukast, compared with placebo, produced significant improvement (p < or = 0.001) from baseline by day 2 of treatment (after 2 doses) in the daytime nasal symptoms score, nighttime symptoms score, and composite symptoms score. Differences between montelukast and placebo for these end points in mean change from baseline at day 2 were -0.08 (95% CI, -0.12, -0.03), -0.08 (95% CI, -0.13, -0.04), and -0.08 (95% CI, -0.12, -0.04), respectively. These data represented a mean reduction for montelukast of 11-13% in symptom scores from baseline for each end point at day 2. When compared with the full 2-week response, these observed differences for each end point at day 2 (after 2 doses) represented a substantial proportion (over 70%) of the overall treatment benefits seen. Significant improvement (p < or = 0.001) in the daytime eye symptoms score was seen by day 1 (-0.08 [-0.12, -0.03]), after the first dose. In patients treated for SAR, montelukast has a beneficial effect on daytime and nighttime symptoms by the 2nd day of daily therapy.

Montelukast effectively treats the nighttime impact of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Nighttime problems constitute a significant burden on the quality of life of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of montelukast on nighttime AR symptoms. METHODS: In seven multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trials, nighttime problems were assessed as the nighttime symptoms score (NSS), an average of three individual symptom scores: difficulty going to sleep, nighttime awakening, and nasal congestion on awakening (each rated 0 = none to 3 = severe). Patients (aged 15-82 years) were randomized to receive montelukast, 10 mg (n = 1751), placebo (n = 1557), or the positive control loratadine, 10 mg (n = 1616). RESULTS: In a combined analysis, changes from baseline (mean +/- SE) in NSS were -0.28 +/- 0.01, -0.16 +/- 0.01, and -0.24 +/- 0.01 for the montelukast, placebo, and loratadine groups, respectively. Difference versus placebo in least-squares mean change from baseline were -0.11 (95% confidence interval, -0.14, -0.08; p < or = 0.001) for montelukast and -0.09 (-0.12, -0.06; p < or = 0.001) for loratadine. Strong baseline correlations (R > 0.70; p < 0.001) of NSS and two of its individual symptoms with the sleep domain of the validated Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire support the validity and importance of measuring nighttime morbidity in SAR. Furthermore, a clinically important benefit of montelukast on the nighttime impact of SAR was shown using an analysis anchored on the Patient's Global Evaluation. CONCLUSION: These data underscore the importance of nighttime problems in patients with SAR and the need to treat nighttime symptoms. In these studies, montelukast significantly improved the NSS, a clinically relevant and valid measure in patients with SAR.

Fluticasone propionate HFA-134a pressurized metered-dose inhaler in adolescents and adults with moderate to severe asthma.

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 397 patients with moderate to severe asthma, previously treated with bronchodilators alone, received fluticasone propionate 88, 220, or 440 microg twice daily, or placebo via metered dose inhaler (MDI) for 12 weeks. Mean change from baseline to endpoint in pre-dose percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was greater (p < 0.001) in each fluticasone propionate group (9.0%, 88 microg bid; 9.8%, 220 microg bid; 11.2%, 440 microg bid) versus placebo (3.4%). Morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and supplemental albuterol use also improved in all fluticasone propionate groups versus placebo. The incidence of adverse events and 24-hour urine cortisol excretion rates were similar between active treatments and placebo.

Randomized controlled trial evaluating the clinical benefit of montelukast for treating spring seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of allergic rhinitis are mediated in part by cysteinyl leukotrienes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical benefit of montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, administered once daily for treating seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study enrolled 1,214 healthy, nonsmoking outpatients aged 15 to 85 years with spring allergic rhinitis, positive skin test to a spring allergen, and predefined daytime nasal symptoms. After a 3- to 5-day placebo run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with montelukast 10 mg (n = 522), loratadine 10 mg (n = 171), or placebo (n = 521) once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks. During the run-in and treatment periods, symptoms were evaluated in a daily diary using a 0 (best) to 3 (worst) scale. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of randomized patients were clinically similar in the three treatment groups. Montelukast was significantly more effective than placebo (P = 0.003) in improving the daytime nasal symptoms score (difference in least square means, -0.09; 95% confidence interval, -0.16, -0.03) averaged over 2 weeks of therapy. The treatment effect of montelukast was significantly greater (P < 0.05), relative to placebo, for all secondary endpoints, including nighttime symptoms and daytime eye symptoms, patient and physician global evaluations of allergic rhinitis, and rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life. Loratadine, which served as a positive control, was significantly more effective than placebo for most endpoints, validating the study results. Both montelukast and loratadine were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Therapy with montelukast significantly improves assessments of symptom severity as well as quality-of-life parameters for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Combination therapy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Allergic rhinitis is a common allergic condition. There are a variety of pharmacologic treatments, including antihistamines, oral decongestants, and intranasal corticosteroids. Leukotrienes cause significant nasal obstruction. Leukotriene receptor antagonists decrease symptoms and improve quality of life in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Similar to antihistamines, antileukotrienes appear to be less efficacious than nasal corticosteroids. Combination therapy of histamine and leukotriene antagonists produces symptomatic improvement as well as improved quality of life. Areas of study for combination antimediator therapy include expanding the initial findings with regard to nasal steroids, investigation of patient preference and compliance, use in perennial allergic rhinitis, and treatment of "one airway," i.e., treatment of concurrent allergic rhinitis and asthma.