Coding of Central Cancer Registry Industry and Occupation Information: The Texas and Louisiana Experiences.

BACKGROUND: Usual industry and occupation text information have been collected by central cancer registries but few have had the resources to code these data, limiting their usefulness for assessing occupational cancer risks. STUDY AIMS: This project was undertaken to use software available from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) to code industry and occupation information in cancer records reported to the Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) and the Louisiana Tumor Registry (LTR) and to assess the feasibility of its use in ongoing registry operations; to assess the quality of the reported information; and to determine its usefulness in occupational cancer research. METHODS: De-identified data files of TCR (n = 103,276) and LTR (n = 26,090) cancer records were obtained for diagnosis years 2010 and 2011, respectively, for cases aged 14 years and older, with industry and occupation text. These data fields were coded to the 2000 US Census Bureau using the NIOSH Industry and Occupation Computerized Coding System (NIOCCS) software at the high level confidence (90% or greater accuracy) and through manual code assignments for records not coded by NIOCCS. RESULTS: NIOCCS assigned a code for 37.2% of TCR records and 59.9% of LTR records. Examination of the quality of the coded data found 44.2% of TCR records and 31.1% of LTR records to have missing, unknown, or otherwise insufficient text for assigning a specific industry and occupation code. Additionally, the vague noninformative category of "retired" was reported for 14.9% and 11.2% of TCR and LTR records, respectively. Records with "homemaker/housewife" or those with terms indicating that they never worked represented 7.2% of TCR cases and 9.7% of LTR cases. Excluding the unknown, never worked, and retired categories, no one specific industry or occupation major grouping represented more than 5% of cases in either of the registries. CONCLUSION: NIOCCS is a helpful tool for coding industry and occupation text and continues to improve, but other registry resources are required for implementation into ongoing operations. Improvement in data quality of reported text information in cancer records is paramount to maximize the efficiency of NIOCCS and improve the availability of coded, specific industry and occupation information for occupational cancer research.

Incidence and risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in Texas Latinos: implications for prevention research.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in the U.S. despite a decline in cancer overall. Latinos have higher rates of HCC than the general population according to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Not included in SEER, Texas Latinos make up one-fifth of the U.S. Latino population. To determine whether HCC incidence differs among U.S. and Texas Latinos, this descriptive study compares HCC incidence from 1995 through 2006 among three Latino populations: U.S. SEER, Texas overall and a South Texas subset. To identify lines of prevention research, we compare prevalence of known HCC risk factors among these Latino groups. METHODS: Data were collected from the U.S. SEER Program, Texas Cancer Registry and Texas Department of State Health Services (TDSHS). Annual age-specific and age-adjusted HCC incidence rates, annual percent changes (APCs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated as well as prevalence of obesity, diabetes, heavy alcohol use and cigarette smoking. RESULTS: Of the three Latino groups compared, South Texas Latinos had the highest age-adjusted HCC incidence rates and SEER Latinos had the lowest (10.6/100,000 (10.1-11.1) and 7.5/100,000 (7.2-7.7), respectively). HCC incidence significantly increased over time (APCs>0) among Latinos in all three geographic groups. Between 1995 and 2006, there was an increase in obesity among all three populations, and obesity was highest among South Texas Latinos. Diabetes increased among U.S. Latinos, and Latino women in South Texas had significantly higher diabetes prevalence than U.S. Latino women. Cigarette smoking and heavy alcohol use were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of HCC among Latinos in South Texas is higher than elsewhere in the United States. Higher rates of HCC among Texas and South Texas Latinos may be associated with greater prevalence of obesity and diabetes, risk factors for HCC that are amenable to intervention.

Cervical cancer incidence in the United States in the US-Mexico border region, 1998-2003.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer mortality rates have declined in the United States, primarily because of Papanicolaou testing. However, limited information is available about the incidence of the disease in the US-Mexico border region, where some of the poorest counties in the United States are located. This study was undertaken to help compare the patterns of cervical cancer incidence among women in the US-Mexico border region and other parts of the United States. METHODS: Age-adjusted cervical cancer incidence rates for border counties in the states bordering Mexico (California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas) for the years 1998 to 2003 were compared with the rates for nonborder counties of the border states and with those of nonborder states. Differences were examined by age, race, ethnicity, rural residence, educational attainment, poverty, migration, stage of disease, and histology. RESULTS: Overall, Hispanic women had almost twice the cervical cancer incidence of non-Hispanic women in border counties, and Hispanic women in the border states had higher rates than did non-Hispanic women in nonborder states. In contrast, cervical cancer incidence rates among black women in the border counties were lower than those among black women in the nonborder states. Among white women, however, incidence rates were higher among those in nonborder states. Differences in cervical cancer incidence rates by geographic locality were also evident by age, urban/rural residence, migration from outside the United States, and stage of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in cervical cancer incidence in the US-Mexico border counties, when the incidence is compared with that of other counties and geographic regions, are evident. Of particular concern are the higher rates of late-stage cervical cancer diagnosed among women in the border states, especially because such cervical cancer is preventable.

Birth weight, ethnicity, and occurrence of cancer in children: a population-based, incident case-control study in the State of Texas, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between birth weight and risk of early age childhood cancer and whether racial differences in birth weight distribution could explain differences in the incidence of cancer in white, Hispanic, and black children. METHODS: We compared birth weights of 268 children younger than five years old and diagnosed with cancer in the State of Texas in 1995 to the birth weights of 2680 randomly selected, age-matched population-based controls. Birth weight, sex, race/ethnicity, maternal age, smoking status, parity, and gestational age information was ascertained from the birth certificates. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between high birth weight (>4,000 g) and occurrence of childhood cancer. RESULTS: Increased odds ratios (OR) were found for "total cancer cases" (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.1), "leukemia cases" (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.9-3.0) and "acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cases" (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.1). Increased ORs in the former two groups were shown to be due to ALL cases. Including the race/ethnicity variable in the regression model did not affect the ORs. CONCLUSION: Compared to newborns who weighed between 2500 and 4000 g at birth, children who weighed >4,000 g had an increased risk of developing childhood ALL during the first five years of life. Birth weight differences does not explain the sequence of childhood cancer incidence by race/ethnicity.